Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

Truncation of the transcriptional repressor protein Cre1 in Trichoderma reesei Rut-C30 turns it into an activator

  • 1,
  • 2, 3,
  • 2,
  • 1 and
  • 1Email author
Fungal Biology and Biotechnology20185:15

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40694-018-0059-0

  • Received: 15 April 2018
  • Accepted: 2 August 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

The filamentous fungus Trichoderma reesei (T. reesei) is a natural producer of cellulolytic and xylanolytic enzymes and is therefore industrially used. Many industries require high amounts of enzymes, in particular cellulases. Strain improvement strategies by random mutagenesis yielded the industrial ancestor strain Rut-C30. A key property of Rut-C30 is the partial release from carbon catabolite repression caused by a truncation of the repressor Cre1 (Cre1-96). In the T. reesei wild-type strain a full cre1 deletion leads to pleiotropic effects and strong growth impairment, while the truncated cre1-96 enhances cellulolytic activity without the effect of growth deficiencies. However, it is still unclear which function Cre1-96 has in Rut-C30.

Results

In this study, we deleted and constitutively expressed cre1-96 in Rut-C30. We found that the presence of Cre1-96 in Rut-C30 is crucial for its cellulolytic and xylanolytic performance under inducing conditions. In the case of the constitutively expressed Cre1-96, the cellulase activity could further be improved approximately twofold. The deletion of cre1-96 led to growth deficiencies and morphological abnormalities. An in silico domain prediction revealed that Cre1-96 has all necessary properties that a classic transactivator needs. Consequently, we investigated the cellular localization of Cre1-96 by fluorescence microscopy using an eYFP-tag. Cre1-96 is localized in the fungal nuclei under both, inducing and repressing conditions. Furthermore, chromatin immunoprecipitation revealed an enrichment of Cre1-96 in the upstream regulatory region of the main transactivator of cellulases and xylanases, Xyr1. Interestingly, transcript levels of cre1-96 show the same patterns as the ones of xyr1 under inducing conditions.

Conclusions

The findings suggest that the truncation turns Cre1 into an activating regulator, which primarily exerts its role by approaching the upstream regulatory region of xyr1. The conversion of repressor proteins to potential activators in other biotechnologically used filamentous fungi can be applied to increase their enzyme production capacities.

Keywords

  • Carbon catabolite repression
  • Trichoderma reesei
  • Cre1
  • Gene regulation
  • Transcription factor
  • Cellulases
  • Xylanases
  • Chromatin

Background

Cellulose and hemicellulose are the most abundant biopolymers in plants. After the industrial processing of trees, crops and other plants, which are grown for food and other purposes, a lot of cellulosic and hemicellulosic waste accumulates [1]. The quality and composition of this waste can be quite versatile, depending on the branch of industry they originate from. However, they all share a significant, unused carbohydrate content that can be utilized for the production of valuable products [1]. The main challenge for an economic utilization of these waste products is the efficient conversion of cellulose-rich biomass to products such as (ligno)cellulosic ethanol [2]. One main limitation is the extraction of monomeric and dimeric sugars such as cellobiose, d-glucose and d-xylose from cellulose and hemicellulose [3]. The rigidity of the structure of cellulose and hemicellulose requires first mechanical and chemical treatment, which demand high temperatures, harsh chemicals and create an ecologically difficult disposable waste stream. Secondly, hydrolysis of cellulose and hemicellulose is done enzymatically. For the hydrolysis in industrial scale, the main bottleneck is an affordable price on bulk amounts of cellulose and hemicellulose degrading enzymes [3]. The filamentous fungus Trichoderma reesei (T. reesei) is one of the top producers of such enzymes (e.g. cellobiohydrolases (EC 3.2.1.91), endoglucanases (EC 3.2.1.4), endo-β-1,4-xylanases (EC 3.2.1.8), β-xylosidases (EC 3.2.1.37) (reviewed in [4])) in industry. Those enzymes are moderately expressed in the presence of cellulose and the hemicellulose xylan and stronger by the respective degradation products. Surprisingly, lactose also triggers the expression of these enzymes even though it is not present in the natural environment of the fungus. Although the exact induction mechanism is not fully understood, the uptake of lactose by a permease is necessary for the activation of cellulase gene expression [5].

Anyhow, the enzyme formation is limited by carbon catabolite repression (CCR) in the presence of high concentrations of easily metabolizable monomeric carbohydrates, such as d-glucose or d-xylose [6]. The uptake of d-glucose enables the fungus to rapidly gain energy; hence, the degradation of complex biopolymers by the cellulolytic and xylanolytic enzymes is shut down. The CCR mechanism is well conserved amongst various organisms ranging from bacteria to humans. Based on the sequence homologies to CreA from Aspergillus species, the Carbon catabolite repressor protein Cre1 (encoded by cre1) was described as the regulator of CCR in T. reesei during the 1990ies [7]. Cre1 is a C2H2 zinc finger protein and binds to a 5′-SYGGRG-3′ motif within upstream regulatory regions (URR) of cellulase and xylanase encoding genes (e.g. cbh1 [8], xyn1 [9]). Its regulon also comprises sugar transporters, developmental processes, and parts of the chromatin remodelling machinery such as nucleosome positioning [10, 11]. Most notably, Cre1 acts negatively on the transcription of the main and essential transactivator of cellulolytic and xylanolytic enzyme expression, Xyr1 [12]. Thus, Xyr1 is also a subject to CCR mediated by Cre1 [13]. With regards to the industry-scale production of hydrolytic enzymes, top producing T. reesei strains became a necessity. Random mutagenesis yielded the mutant strain Rut-C30, which achieves enzyme yields of 20 g/L [14]. The nowadays used industrial T. reesei strains (yielding up to 100 g/L [15]) are based on Rut-C30 and thus share a similar genetic background. Predominately, this includes a truncation of Cre1, which led to partial de-repression from CCR on d-glucose [16]. Nevertheless, with regards to the wild-type system, we refer in this manuscript to d-glucose as a repressing condition. In 2014, Mello-de-Sousa and colleagues used the T. reesei wild-type strain to demonstrate that this truncated Cre1 (Cre1-96) positively influences cellulase expression, while the full deletion of cre1 leads to strong pleiotropic effects and growth impairment [17]. The enhancement of cellulase expression by Cre1-96 was attributed to a chromatin opening in the URR of cellulase-encoding genes and also of the xyr1 gene. However, the impact of Cre1-96 was never studied directly in Rut-C30. The exact regulatory mechanism of Cre1-96 and its role as a putative new transcription factors in industrial strains still remain to be elucidated. In this study, we investigated the effects of a cre1-96 deletion in Rut-C30 on its growth behaviour, the enzymatic activities and the transcriptional profiles of cellulase- and xylanase-encoding genes (cbh1, xyn1) and of xyr1. To determine the subcellular localization of the putative transcription factor, the nuclear import was examined under cellulase inducing and repressing conditions. Moreover, we performed chromatin immunoprecipitation and nuclease digestion to learn which genes are targeted by Cre1-96 and what is its impact on the DNA accessibility within the URR of its target genes. Finally, we constitutively expressed cre1-96 in Rut-C30 and examined the impact on the cellulolytic activities.

Results

Deletion and constitutive expression of cre1-96 in T. reesei Rut-C30

To identify the function of Cre1-96 in Rut-C30, the encoding gene was deleted from the genome. Therefore, a deletion cassette was integrated by homologous recombination at the cre1-96 locus, resulting in a gene replacement of cre1-96 in Rut-C30. Two cre1-96 deletion strains were identified by diagnostic PCR (Additional file 1: Figure S1). Both deletion strains were used throughout this study and are in the following termed Rut-C30Δcre1-96 (1) and (2) in the figures. In the parent strain Rut-C30, the structural gene of cre1-96 was put under the control of the tef1 promoter. The homologous integration of this expression cassette at the cre1-96 locus was again verified by diagnostic PCR and the resulting strain is in the following termed Rut-C30OEcre1-96 (Additional file 2: Figure S2).

Cre1-96 is required for cellulolytic and xylanolytic performance of Rut-C30

To investigate a possible impact of Cre1-96 on cellulase and xylanase gene expression, the cre1-96 deletion strain and its parent strain Rut-C30 were grown on plates containing lactose or carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) to resemble cellulase-inducing conditions (Fig. 1). Further, they were grown on xylan for induction of xylanase expression (Fig. 1), on a non-inducing condition (glycerol) and on a repressing condition (d-glucose) (Additional file 3: Figure S3). Photos of the plates were taken after 24, 48, 60 and 84 h of growth. On lactose, no clear differences in growth were obtained between the two tested strains at any time point (Fig. 1). However, the radial colony formation seemed to be abnormal after 60 and 84 h when cre1-96 was absent (Fig. 1). On CMC and xylan, growth deficiencies were observed in the cre1-96 deletion strain at all times points in comparison to the parent strain. The colony was clearly reduced in size, while no influence on sporulation was visible (Fig. 1). On glycerol and d-glucose no obvious growth reduction was visible at any time point. However, the spore pigmentation changed in colour intensity (from yellow to light yellow or white) on glycerol and in shade (from green or yellow to brownish) on d-glucose comparing the cre1-96 deletion strain to Rut-C30 after 60 and 84 h (Additional file 3: Figure S3).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Growth behaviour of Rut-C30Δcre1-96 under cellulase inducing conditions. The T. reesei strains Rut-C30 and Rut-C30Δcre1-96 were pre-grown on MEX plates and were then transferred in biological duplicates to MA medium plates supplemented with 1% (w/v) lactose, CMC or xylan. Plates were incubated at 30 °C and pictures were taken after 24, 48, 60 and 84 h

To learn whether the slower growth of the strains carrying the cre1-96 deletion results from less cellulase and xylanase activity, we tested supernatants from cultivations under inducing conditions (lactose) but also under repressing conditions by enzymatic assays. Supplementary, the abundance of cre1-96 transcript was determined under inducing conditions. In contrast to the growth experiments on plates, the biomass formation in the liquid cultures was now also reduced on lactose in the Δcre1-96 strains (Fig. 2a). For this reason, the obtained cellulolytic and xylanolytic activities (Fig. 2b, c) were normalized to the biomass. Normalized to the biomass, the cre1-96 deletion caused a complete loss of cellulolytic and of xylanolytic activity at earlier time points (36 and 48 h) and a strong reduction is observed after 60 h (Fig. 2b, c). Expression of cre1-96 itself was equally high at all time points under inducing conditions and necessary for the enzyme production (Fig. 2e). Obviously, the presence of cre1-96 is needed for a good performance in cellulase and xylanase production. Importantly, cellulolytic activities were also lost when d-glucose is used as the carbon source, which is not the case in the parent strain Rut-C30 (Fig. 2d). This reflects that in Rut-C30 the production of cellulases and xylanases is positively influenced by the presence of Cre1-96 regardless if inducing or repressing conditions are prevailing.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Cellulolytic and xylanolytic activities in absence and presence of Cre1-96. T. reesei strains Rut-C30 (blue squares) and both Rut-C30Δcre1-96 strains (yellow and orange squares) were cultivated in liquid medium supplemented with 1% (w/v) lactose or d-glucose for 36, 48 and 60 h. The endo-cellulolytic on lactose (b) and on glucose (d) as well as the xylanolytic activities on lactose (c) in the culture supernatants were measured in biological and technical duplicates and normalized to the biomass measured as wet weight (a). The enzymatic activities are given as means and the error bars indicate the standard deviations. The values were statistically analysed by an unpaired two-tailed t test in a confidence interval of 95%, and asterisks indicate significant differences. e Relative cre1-96 transcript ratios were analysed for both deletion strains and Rut-C30 grown on lactose. Transcript analysis was performed in biological and technical duplicates by qPCR, data were normalized to the housekeeping genes sar1 and act, and referred to the transcript level of Rut-C30 at 36 h. The relative transcript ratios are given as means and the error bars indicate the standard deviations. Error bars are not shown for standard deviations ≤ 3.5%. All values were statistically analysed in a confidence interval of 95%; ‘n.d.’ means not detected

Cre1-96 influences the transcript formation of cbh1, xyn1 and xyr1

The findings on the reduced enzyme activities prompted us to examine whether Cre1-96 regulates Cre1-target genes on the transcriptional level under inducing conditions. Therefore, we measured the transcript levels of cbh1, xyn1 and xyr1 on lactose in Rut-C30 and both cre1-96 deletion strains. In the case of cbh1, the transcript levels were significantly reduced in the deletion strains compared to the parent strain at all time points (Fig. 3a). In the case of xyn1, the transcript levels were also significantly reduced in the deletion strains compared to its parent strain (Fig. 3b). Generally spoken, the cbh1 and xyn1 transcriptional profiles matched the measured enzymatic activities in Rut-C30 and both deletion strains. Interestingly, the transcript levels of xyr1 were also reduced in the deletion strains compared to its parent strains after 36 and 48 h (Fig. 3c), but not any more at the later time point (60 h). To summarize, Cre1-96 has an impact on the formation of cbh1 and xyn1 transcript levels, and also on those of the main activator Xyr1 under inducing conditions.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Transcript levels of cbh1, xyn1 and xyr1 in absence and presence of Cre1-96. T. reesei strains Rut-C30 (blue bars) and both Rut-C30Δcre1-96 strains (yellow and orange bars) were cultivated in liquid medium supplemented with 1% (w/v) lactose for 36, 48 and 60 h. Transcript analyses of cbh1 (a), xyn1 (b) and xyr1 () were performed in biological and technical duplicates by qPCR, data were normalized to the housekeeping genes sar1 and act, and referred to the respective transcript levels of Rut-C30 at 36 h. The relative transcript ratios are given as means and the error bars indicate the standard deviations. All values were statistically analysed in a confidence interval of 95% and asterisks indicate significant differences

Cre1-96 only indirectly regulates genes involved in the lactose metabolism

The observed differences in the biomass formation in liquid culture on lactose (compare Fig. 2a) gave rise to the possibility that the lactose metabolism could be altered in the cre1-96 deletion strains. Several genes are necessary for the conversion of lactose to D-galactose and d-glucose. The lactose hydrolysis depends on the extracellular β-galactosidase Bga1 and on the d-xylose reductase Xyl1. A deletion of xyl1 results in reduced growth on lactose, which is explained by low transcript levels of bga1 [18]. Here, we investigated the genes coding for the d-xylose reductase (xyl1), the β-galactosidase (bga1), the galactokinase (gal1) and a lactose specific permease (Tre3405) [5]. A previous study demonstrated that Xyr1 is involved in the regulation of some lactose metabolism genes by activating xyl1 and bga1, but not gal1 transcription [19]. As it seems that Cre1-96 has an influence on the xyr1 transcript formation (compare Fig. 3c), it is very likely that also genes involved in the lactose metabolism are affected by the cre1-96 deletion. Significantly reduced transcripts of the xyl1, bga1 and Tre3405 genes were detected in the cre1-96 deletion strain (Fig. 4a–c), whereas gal1 transcripts accumulated to similar levels (Fig. 4d). Altogether, this suggests that Cre1-96 acts directly on xyr1 transcript formation and thereby indirectly influences the transcript levels of xyl1, bga1 and Tre3405.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Transcript levels of xyl1, bga1 and Tre3405 in absence and presence of Cre1-96. T. reesei strains Rut-C30 (blue bars) and both Rut-C30Δcre1-96 strains (yellow and orange bars) were cultivated in liquid medium supplemented with 1% (w/v) lactose for 36, 48 and 60 h. Transcript analyses of xyl1 (a), bga1 (b) and Tre3405 (c) were performed in biological and technical duplicates by qPCR, data were normalized to the housekeeping genes sar1 and act, and referred to the respective transcript levels of Rut-C30 at 36 h. The relative transcript ratios are given as means and the error bars indicate the standard deviations. All values were statistically analysed in a confidence interval of 95% and asterisks indicate significant differences

Cre1-96 fulfils the requirements for a transcription factor

Enzymatic measurements and transcript analysis suggested that Cre1-96 exerts a positive effect on cellulase and xylanase gene expression, on the transcript formation of cellulase and xylanase-encoding genes, and most importantly on xyr1. To be considered as an activator, some properties need to be fulfilled. First of all, Cre1-96 needs to bind the DNA of its target genes, which is supported by previously reported in vivo footprinting experiments and in vitro protein-DNA binding studies for Cre1-96 and Cre1 [7, 17, 20]. A second essential prerequisite is its localization in the nucleus, at least transiently. In silico domain analysis revealed that Cre1-96 has a putative bipartite nuclear localization signal (NLS) (TVIK – linker – RPYK) located at amino acids (aa) positions 33–63 (Fig. 5a). This bipartite NLS was found with a score of 5 in the case of both proteins, Cre1 and Cre1-96. Scores ranging from 3 to 5 suggest that the protein can be localized both in the nucleus and the cytoplasm. Besides this, alignment of Cre1-96 and Cre1 to homologues from other filamentous fungi revealed further conserved domains or amino acids (Additional file 4: Figure S4). In Cre1-96 a part of a zinc finger domain was identified at 59–79 aa, and a putative transactivation domain (25–37 aa) as well (Fig. 5b). The conserved sequence parts, which are missing in Cre1-96 compared to the full-length Cre1, are a part of the full zinc finger binding domain (87–109 aa), stretches of acidic amino acids (121–129 aa, 243–246 aa, 359–374 aa), two other conserved domains (256–289 aa and 317–325 aa), the nuclear export signal (NES, 304–312 aa), a C-terminal repression domain (317–343 aa) and the phosphorylation site at Ser241 [20] (Fig. 5a). To summarize the in silico analysis, the truncated protein Cre1-96 has lost many potentially important domains but still contains all domains that are essential for a transcription factor, i.e. a DNA-binding domain, NLS and one N-terminal acidic region potentially functioning as activator domain.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5

In silico domain prediction of Cre1 (a) and Cre1-96 (b). The putative domains of Cre1 (A) and Cre1-96 (B) were predicted by a number of in silico prediction tools and alignment algorithms as described in the Methods section. Numbers indicate the amino acid (aa) positions and coloured boxes indicate identified domains: blue, C2H2 zinc finger; yellow, linker; pink, nuclear localization signal (NLS); black-white striped, transactivation domain (TAD); grey, other conserved region; turquoise, Q (glutamine), DE (aspartic (D) and glutamic acid (E)); green, Q-X7 Q-X7-Q; dark blue, nuclear export signal (NES) and violet, repression domain. Phosphorylation site Ser241 according to [20] is marked. The predicted zinc finger domain superfamily are presented as amino acid sequence and the zinc finger binding sites (cysteine (C) or histidine (H)) are coloured in blue. The e-value is given below the amino acid sequence

To monitor the localization of Cre1-96 in the fungal hyphae, a strain expressing an eYFP-tagged Cre1-96 was generated and cultivated in liquid medium containing d-glucose or lactose. It should be noted that we used QM6a for analysis of the nuclear transport of Cre1-96 to exclude any cross-genetic effects resulting from the other mutations present in Rut-C30. Confocal fluorescence microscopy was performed using a droplet of the liquid culture and the visualization of the fungal nuclei was achieved with Hoechst staining. The localization of Cre1-96 was determined by the detection of fluorescence emission of eYFP. Merging of the eYFP signal and the nuclei fluorescence emissions revealed the presence of Cre1-96 in the nuclei of T. reesei. Nuclear localization of Cre1-96 was observed under both, repressing (Fig. 6a) and inducing conditions (Fig. 6b), similar to the full length Cre1 [21].
Fig. 6
Fig. 6

Confocal microscopy analysis of the localization of Cre1-96. The T. reesei strain QM6acre1-96::eyfp was cultivated in liquid medium supplemented with 1% (w/v) d-glucose (a) or 1% (w/v) lactose (b). For the visualization of fungal nuclei a Hoechst staining was performed. The following pictures were imaged to localize Cre1-96::eYFP in the fungal hyphae: detection of eYFP (EYFP), detection of the nuclei within the fungal cells (Hoechst), overlay of eYFP and Hoechst emissions (Merge), and brightfield image (DIC). Scales are given in the DIC pictures

Cre1-96 targets Cre1-binding sites within the URR of xyr1

To learn where the transcription factor Cre1-96 is targeted to, we performed chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) followed by qPCR analyses. For this purpose, the strain expressing eYFP-tagged Cre1-96 was used. As an initial control we tested cellulase activities and biomass formation in tagged and untagged strains to exclude any impact of the eYFP-tag. The results of these preliminary experiments show no impact of the tag on Cre1-96 function (Additional file 5: Figure S5). As the nuclear localization of Cre1-96 was observed after 16 h cultivation in liquid malt extract (MEX) medium supplemented with d-glucose, this condition was chosen for the ChIP experiment. An enrichment of Cre1-96 was identified with anti-GFP antibodies (please note that they are able to bind eYFP) and qPCR. Since we had already indications that xyr1 is a target of Cre1-96, specific primers were chosen for the analysis of Cre1-96 associated DNA within the URR of xyr1. The relative amount of Cre1-96 targeted DNA is almost threefold enriched in this target region compared to the non-target housekeeping gene sar1 indicating that indeed the truncated Cre1-96 protein might directly activate xyr1 transcription (Fig. 7).
Fig. 7
Fig. 7

Chromatin immunoprecipitation of Cre1-96::eYFP. The T. reesei strain QM6acre1-96::eyfp was cultivated for 16 h in 20 mL MEX medium supplemented with 1% (w/v) d-glucose. After crosslinking, the chromatin was enzymatically fragmented by MNase treatment and Cre1-96::eYFP targeted DNA was enriched using anti-GFP antibodies. The relative amount of DNA was measured by qPCR. The immunoprecipitated DNA was normalized to the input control. The resulting ratio for the xyr1 gene (grey bar) was further normalized to the ratio of housekeeping gene sar1, which is set to 1 (black bar). The values were statistically analysed in a confidence interval of 95% and the asterisk indicates a significant difference

Chromatin accessibility is only moderately affected by a cre1-96 deletion

Previous reports demonstrated a role of Cre1-96 in promoting chromatin accessibility [17]. Hence, we analysed the chromatin accessibility in the URR of Cre1-96 target genes (i.e. xyr1, xyn1 and cbh1) in the cre1-96 deletion strain and its parent strain under inducing conditions. Both strains were cultivated in liquid medium on lactose. The fungal mycelium was harvested after 36, 48 and 60 h, followed by chromatin accessibility real-time PCR (CHART-PCR). In the case of xyr1, significant differences in the chromatin accessibility were just found after 60 h (Fig. 8a). However, there is no relation between the chromatin status and the transcript level suggesting that chromatin accessibility as measured by our assays is not changing with transcriptional activity. In the case of cbh1, significant opening of chromatin in Rut-C30 went along with higher transcript level compared to the deletion strain (Fig. 8b). However, this could be only observed for one time point (i.e. 48 h). Finally, the chromatin accessibility in the xyn1 URR did differ between Rut-C30 and the cre1-96 deleted strain at two time points of investigation (Fig. 8c). However, again a transcription-related change in accessibility could not be observed.
Fig. 8
Fig. 8

Chromatin accessibility under cellulase inducing conditions. T. reesei strains Rut-C30 (blue symbols) and Rut-C30Δcre1-96 (orange symbols) were cultivated in liquid medium supplemented with 1% (w/v) lactose for 36 (squares), 48 (triangles) and 60 h (dots). CHART-PCR and transcript analysis of cbh1 (b), xyn1 (c) and xyr1 (a) were performed in biological and technical replicates. Both sets of data were normalized to the housekeeping genes sar1 and act. The relative transcript ratios are given as means and plotted on the x-axis and the chromatin accessibility indices (CAI) are plotted on the y-axis. Error bars indicate the standard deviations. All CAI values were statistically analysed in a confidence interval of 95% and asterisks indicate significant differences amongst the chromatin-related data

Constitutively expressed cre1-96 enhances cellulase activity

Based on above findings, we have solid indication that Cre1-96 is a necessary activating regulator for cellulase gene expression in Rut-C30. For benefits towards biotechnological applications, we constructed a T. reesei strain having a constitutively expressed cre1-96 under the control of the tef1 promoter (in the following termed Rut-C30OEcre1-96), which was cultivated in parallel with the deletion strain and the parent strain in liquid medium on lactose. Cellulase activities were subsequently measured in the culture supernatants. Rut-C30OEcre1-96 had a constant increase in the cellulase activity over time, and it was significantly higher than in the other two strains from 48 h of incubation time on (Fig. 9a). After 60 h of incubation, Rut-C30OEcre1-96 outcompeted Rut-C30 in cellulolytic performance almost twofold. With regard to the growth on cellulase inducing substrates, we observed a similar (24 and 48 h) or a slightly faster growth (60 and 84 h) of Rut-C30OEcre1-96 compared to Rut-C30 on CMC plates (Fig. 9b). On lactose, no visible differences in colony size were observed amongst all three strains (Fig. 9b). Similar growth was observed under non-inducing (glycerol) and repressing conditions (d-glucose) (Additional file 6: Figure S6). Importantly, Rut-C30OEcre1-96 did not show the non-radial growth that was observed for Rut-C30Δcre1-96 (Additional files 7 and 8: Tables S1 and S2).
Fig. 9
Fig. 9

Cellulase activity in presence of a constitutively expressed Cre1-96. a T. reesei strains Rut-C30 (blue squares), Rut-C30OEcre1-96 (purple squares) and Rut-C30Δcre1-96 (orange squares) were cultivated in liquid medium supplemented with 1% (w/v) lactose for 36, 48 and 60 h. The endo-cellulolytic activities in the culture supernatants were measured in biological and technical duplicates and normalized to the biomass. The enzymatic activities are given as means and the error bars indicate the standard deviations. Error bars are not shown for standard deviations ≤ 3.5%. The values were statistically analysed by an ordinary one-way ANOVA and a Tukey’s posthoc test in a confidence interval of 95%, and asterisks indicate significant differences. b For the growth assays, the T. reesei strains Rut-C30, Rut-C30OEcre1-96 and Rut-C30Δcre1-96 were pre-grown on MEX plates and were then transferred to MA medium plates supplemented with 1% (w/v) CMC or 1% (w/v) lactose. Plates were incubated at 30 °C and pictures were taken after 24, 48, 60 and 84 h

Discussion

The carbon catabolite repressor Cre1 represses transcription of its targets genes by binding their URR. Surprisingly, if truncated, Cre1-96 is still able to bind DNA but converts to a putative activator. Like Cre1/Cre1-96, the transcription factor PacC, which is involved in pH-regulation in A. nidulans [22], is a zinc finger protein. PacC is processed by the Pal signalling pathway under alkaline pH and subsequently, moves into the nucleus. In its truncated form it acts as repressor of acidic-expressed genes. Even if its molecular action, namely competition for DNA binding, is different from Cre1-96, in both cases a truncated zinc finger protein acts as transcription factor. The detailed findings of the Cre1 repressor truncation in T. reesei are discussed below.

When cre1 is exchanged for cre1-96 in the wild-type strain QM6a, higher cbh1, cbh2 and xyr1 transcript levels were obtained compared to a full deletion of cre1 [17]. However, Rut-C30 that natively carries Cre1-96 had even higher transcript levels of those genes than the QM6a-CREI96 strain. Therefore, we deleted cre1-96 in Rut-C30 to study the effects on transcript and corresponding enzyme levels.

We observed growth deficiencies, i.e. a slower growth, reduced biomass formation and growth abnormalities, in the Rut-C30 strain lacking cre1-96. Under cellulase inducing conditions, we found reduced growth in the cre1-96 deletion strain compared to its parental strain on CMC plates and lactose liquid cultures (compare Figs. 1, 2a) and significant differences in the transcript ratios of genes involved in the lactose metabolism (compare Fig. 4). This indicates a change either in uptake of degradation products into the cell by transporters or in the enzymatic activity required for the conversion of CMC or lactose into an inducing substance (e.g. transglycosylation by BGLI). We did not observe differences in growth on lactose between the parent and the cre1-96 deletion strain in the case of cultivation on plates while we did observe differences in the case of cultivation in liquid medium (i.e. determination of the mycelial biomass weight). Interestingly, Cánovas and colleagues found that the biomass accumulation from plates does usually not correlate with the radial growth diameter [23] so these abnormalities cannot be explained by the current model. Particularly, a non-radial growth of fungal hyphae was observed on lactose in the cre1-96 deletion strain (compare Fig. 1). At this point it has to be mentioned that, a cre1 deletion in the T. reesei strain QM6a leads to strongly impaired growth and morphological changes [8]. Portnoy and colleagues identified several genes involved in hyphal development (e.g. RAS1, PhiA, MedA), which are regulated by Cre1 on d-glucose [10]. Also in other filamentous fungi, like Neurospora crassa (N. crassa), CRE-1 seems to influence the hyphal growth and polarity because the enzyme activity of an involved cAMP protein kinase A is dependent on CRE-1 [24]. Altogether, this implies that Cre1-96 might exert additional functions (similar to Cre1), besides its role in cellulase and hemicellulase gene expression. Another aspect worth considering was reported by dos Santos Castro and colleagues. RNA sequencing analysis of T. reesei QM9414 under repressing (d-glucose) and inducing (cellulose, α-sophorose) conditions [25] indicated that several MFS permeases are differentially expressed on d-glucose. Notably, amongst the strongest down-regulated genes in the absence of Cre1 are proteins involved in cellular transport, such as MFS permeases [10]. This indicates that Cre1 and most probably Cre1-96 might also play a role in the sugar uptake in the cell.

With regard to the cellulase and xylanase activity, we observed either a loss or strong reduction in enzymatic activities in the cre1-96 deletion strain compared to its parental strain (compare Fig. 2b, c). In Rut-C30, the transcript profile of xyr1 relates to the profile of cbh1 (compare Fig. 3), which is in full agreement with previously published results [26]. Most interestingly, the transcription profile of cre1-96 relates to the profile of xyr1 (compare Figs. 2d, 3c). Thus, Cre1-96 might have an effect on the regulation of xyr1 transcription.

The fluorescence microscopy revealed that Cre1-96 is under repressing and inducing conditions present in the nucleus. A carbon source-dependent shuttling of Cre1 between cytosol and nucleus was proposed by Lichius and colleagues [21]. In silico analysis suggests that Cre1 has a nuclear export signal (NES) at amino acids positions 304–312 (LPSLRNLSL, predicted by using [27]). Cre1-96 lacks this putative NES due to its truncation and therefore, could remain inside the nucleus regardless the used carbon source. Besides this, Cre1-96 possesses a putative N-terminal transactivation domain as Cre1 does, but Cre1-96 importantly lacks the C-terminus of Cre1 (compare Fig. 5) that highly likely mediates repression as it was described for CreA in Aspergillus nidulans [28]. Taken together the extended residence in the nucleus, the presence of a putative transactivating domain and the lack of the repression domain, would explain the positive impact of Cre1-96 on the cellulase activity in Rut-C30 compared to the cre1-96 deletion strain under cellulase inducing conditions.

Notably, Cre1-96 also lacks the previously identified phosphorylation site Ser241 [20]. In the case of Cre1, Ser241 needs to be phosphorylated for an efficient DNA binding under repressing conditions. However, Czifersky and colleagues reported that GST fusion proteins of Cre1 fragments without Ser241 bind in vitro regardless the tested condition. Besides this, previously published in vivo footprinting results also supported the capability of Cre1-96 to bind DNA [17].

With regard to the targeting of Cre1-96, we found that Cre1-96 is enriched on its DNA binding sites in the xyr1 URR. However, the chromatin accessibility in the xyr1 URR is not significantly different. Neither for cbh1 or xyn1 any cohesive trend could be observed. Noteworthy, an earlier reported nucleosomal mapping of cbh1 and cbh2 promoter regions showed no positioned nucleosomes under repressing and inducing conditions in Rut-C30 [29, 30]. This lack of positioned nucleosomes is the likely explanation of the similarity in DNA accessibility observed in our experiments between conditions of expressed and non-expressed genes.

Anyhow, we propose here that a truncation of Cre1 positively influences the transactivator Xyr1 and thus enhances cellulolytic performance and phenotypically converts the carbon catabolite repressor into an activator.

Conclusions

Due to a truncation the Cre1 repressor can turn into an activator as seen in Cre1-96, which now functions to activate cellulase and xylanase expression. Cre1-96 meets all requirements for a transcription factor. It localizes to the nucleus and directly binds to the URR of target genes, in particular of the main transactivator of the mentioned enzymes, Xyr1, and most probably exerts thereby its activation role. Our findings encourage testing this strategy to increase enzymatic performance in other filamentous fungi, which contain functional Cre1 homologues.

Methods

Fungal strains

The T. reesei strains QM6aΔtmus53 [31], the QM6aΔtmus53 bearing an eYFP-tagged Cre1-96 (referred to in the text as QM6acre1-96::eyfp, this study), Rut-C30Δtmus53 (referred to in the text as Rut-C30, VTT Finland), two cre1-96 deletion strains Rut-C30Δtmus53Δcre1-96 (referred to in the text as Rut-C30Δcre1-96 (1) and (2), this study) and the cre1-96 constitutively expressing strain Rut-C30Δtmus53OEcre1-96 (referred to in the text as Rut-C30OEcre1-96, this study) were maintained on malt extract (MEX) agar plates containing 0.1% (w/v) peptone from casein at 30 °C. Uridine was added to a final concentration of 5 mM for all Rut-C30 strains. For strain selection hygromycin B was added to a final concentration of 113 U/mL for the QM6a-related strains and 56.5 U/mL for the Rut-C30-related strains. Homokaryon selection was carried out on MEX/peptone/hygromycin B plates, with uridine if applicable, and 0.1% (w/v) Igepal C-60.

Growth conditions

If not indicated otherwise in a Methods section, for cultivation experiments 106 conidia spores per mL were incubated in 100 mL Erlenmeyer flasks on a rotary shaker (180 rpm) at 30 °C for 60 h in 30 mL of MA medium supplemented with 0.1% (w/v) peptone and 1% (w/v) lactose or 1% (w/v) d-glucose as sole carbon source. If not stated otherwise, all strains were cultivated in triplicates and were harvested after 36, 48 and 60 h of cultivation. Fungal mycelia were separated from the supernatant by filtering with Miracloth (EMD Millipore, part of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). Mycelia grown on lactose were weighted immediately before shock freezing and wet weight was used as the biomass reference for the enzymatic assays. Frozen mycelia were used for genomic DNA extraction, RNA extraction and for chromatin digestion. Culture supernatants were used for the measurement of enzymatic activities in technical duplicates.

For the comparison of the growth behaviour on plates, the strains Rut-C30, Rut-C30Δcre1-96 (1) and (2) and Rut-C30OEcre1-96 were pre-grown on solid MEX media with 0.1% (w/v) peptone and were transferred in biological duplicates onto MA agar plates supplemented with 1% (w/v) lactose, CMC, xylan, glycerol or d-glucose for 84 h. Due to the same growth behaviour of the duplicates, only one replicate is displayed in the figures. In the case of the deletion strains, Rut-C30Δcre1-96 (2) is shown.

Plasmid construction

Escherichia coli strain Top10 (Invitrogen, part of Life Technologies, Paisley, UK) was used for all cloning purposes throughout this study and grown on LB medium at 37 °C. Generation of competent E. coli cells and subsequent transformation was performed according to standard protocols using CaCl2. If applicable, ampicillin and hygromycin B were added to final concentrations of 100 mg/mL and 113 U/mL, respectively.

PCRs for all cloning purposes were performed with Pwo DNA Polymerase (peqlab VWR, Radnor, Pennsylvania, USA) or Phusion High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All used primers were purchased from Sigma Aldrich and are listed in Table 1.
Table 1

Primers used for strain construction in this study

Primer name

Sequence 5′–3′

References

5′cre1_NotI fwd

GCGGCCGCTGGAGGTGACGAGAAGAAAAATTCAGG

This study

5′cre1_XmaI rev

CCCGGGAGTCAAAAAGCAAGTACGCGACGTTG

This study

hph_XmaI_BamHI

CCCGGGTTGGATCCAGGGAGACGAGGTTGTGATGAATAC

This study

hph_SpeI rev

ACTAGTAAGTAGCACCGCTGTCGTCTG

This study

5Pcre1_NotI fwd

GCGGCCGCAGCCAAGACTCAGCATAAAGAGGTTG

This study

5Pcre1_XmaI rev

CCCGGGAGGTACCAAACAAAGCGAGCAAGTAC

This study

ptef_BspEI fwd

TCCGGATGTGTGACAGCTCGCGCAG

This study

ptef_NdeI rev

CATATGTGACGGTTTGTGTGATGTAGCGTG

This study

cre1-96_NdeI fwd

CATATGATGCAACGAGCACAGTCTGCC

This study

Cre1-96_BamHI rev

GGATCCTTAGAAAAAAAAGCAGGTAATGGAGGTGC

This study

cre1-96_BspEI fwd

TCCGGAATGCAACGAGCACAGTCTGCC

This study

cre1-96-TAA_NdeI rev

CATATGGAAAAAAAAGCAGGTAATGGAGGTGC

This study

linker_NheI rev

GCTAGCGCGGGGGGCGCAC

This study

linker_NdeI fwd

CATATGCACAACATGGTCAAGCAGAAGC

This study

YFP_NheI fwd

GCTAGCATGGTCAGCAAGGGCGAGG

This study

YFP_BamHI rev

GGATCCCTTGTACAGCTCGTCCATGCCG

This study

For the construction of the cre1-96 deletion cassette the 5′-flank of cre1-96 was amplified by PCR using chromosomal DNA of T. reesei QM6aΔtmus53 (identical sequence to Rut-C30) as template with the primers 5′cre1_NotI fwd and 5′cre1_XmaI rev. The PCR product was subcloned into pJET1.2 (Thermo Scientific) by blunt end ligation using T4 DNA ligase (Thermo Scientific) yielding pJET1.2-5′-cre1. The 3′-flank of cre1 and a hygromycin B resistance cassette were amplified by PCR using chromosomal DNA of T. reesei QM6a-Cre196 [17] as template with the primers hph_XmaI_BamHI and hph_SpeI rev and was inserted into pJET1.2 by blunt end ligation yielding pJET1.2-hph. The hygromycin B resistance cassette bears the constitutive promoter of the pki gene, the hygromycin B structural gene and the terminator of cbh2 [32]. The subcloned 5′-flank of cre1 was recovered by NotI/XmaI digestion and was inserted into the NotI/XmaI-digested vector pJET1.2-hph. The resulting plasmid was termed pJET1.2-5hph3cre1. Subsequently, the vector pJET1.2-5hph3cre1 was cut by NotI and SpeI and the cassette was inserted into a NotI/SpeI-digested derivative pMS plasmid yielding pMS*-5hph3cre1. The orientation of the hygromycin B resistance gene and the pki promoter were in the opposite orientation as the 5′-flank and the 3′-flank of cre1. This was determined by plasmid sequencing (Microsynth, Balgach, Switzerland).

For the constitutive expression of cre1-96 the promoter of the tef1 gene was used. For this purpose, the promoter region (1500 bp upstream of ATG) of tef1 (ptef1) was amplified by PCR using chromosomal DNA of T. reesei QM6aΔtmus53 as template with the primers ptef_BspEI fwd and ptef_NdeI rev. The structural gene cre1-96 was amplified using the primers cre1-96_NdeI fwd and cre1-96_BamHI rev. Both PCR fragments were subcloned into pJET1.2 (Thermo Scientific), yielding pJET1.2-Ptef and pJET1-2-cre1-96. Both plasmids were digested by BspEI/NdeI, the ptef1 fragment was isolated and ligated into the BspEI/NdeI-digested pJET1.2-cre1-96 to yield pJET1.2-Ptefcre1-96. The 5′-flank of cre1 started at -1500 bp until 2400 bp to avoid a residual background of the native cre1 promoter. This 5′-flanking region was amplified using the primers 5Pcre1_NotI fwd and 5Pcre_XmaI rev and was subcloned into pJET1.2 by blunt end ligation using T4 DNA ligase (Thermo Scientific) yielding pJET1.2-5Pcre1. The 3′-flank of cre1 and a hygromycin B resistance cassette was constructed as described for the cre1-96 deletion cassette. The subcloned 5′-flank of cre1 was recovered by NotI/XmaI digestion of pJET1.2-5Pcre1 and was inserted into the NotI/XmaI-digested vector pJET1.2-hph. The resulting plasmid was termed pJET1.2-5′cre1-hph. The plasmid pJET1.2-Ptefcre1-96 was BspEI/BamHI-digested, the fragment Ptefcre1-96 isolated and ligated by cohesive ends with a XmaI/BamHI-digested pJET1.2-5′cre1-hph to yield pJET1.2-3Ptefcre1-96. Subsequently, this plasmid was cut by NotI and SpeI and the cassette was inserted into a NotI/SpeI-digested derivative pMS plasmid yielding the final plasmid pMS*-Ptefcre1-96. The correct orientation and sequence of the plasmid were confirmed by sequencing (Microsynth).

For construction of pMS*-cre1-96::eyfp the coding sequence of cre1-96, a linker and eyfp were amplified by PCR using chromosomal DNA from T. reesei QM6a-Cre196 and the plasmid pCD-EYFP [33] as templates and the following primers: cre1-96_BspEI fwd and cre1-96-TAA_NdeI rev to amplify cre1-96 from QM6a-Cre196; linker_NdeI fwd and linker_NheI rev to amplify the linker sequence from the pCD-EYFP plasmid; YFP_NheI fwd and YFP_BamHI to amplify the coding sequence of eyfp from the pCD-EYFP plasmid. Importantly, the fluorescent tag was fused to the C-terminus of the Cre1-96 because this was reported to be necessary for proper recruitment and import in the case of the full length Cre1 [21]. The PCR products were subcloned into pJET1.2, yielding pJET1.2-cre1-96(-TAA), pJET1.2-linker and pJET1.2-YFP. The first two plasmids were digested with BspEI/NdeI, the cre1-96 fragment was isolated and ligated into the BspEI/NdeI-digested recipient vector pJET1.2-linker to generate the plasmid pJET1.2-cre1-96-linker. The insert cre1-96-linker was recovered by BspEI/NheI digestion and cloned into the BspEI/NheI-digested pJET1.2-YFP to yield pJET1.2-cre1-96::eyfp. A BspEI/BamHI double digest of pJET1.2-cre1-96::eyfp recovered the cre1-96::eyfp insert, which was cloned into the XmaI/BamH-digested vector pJET1.2-5hph3cre1 yielding pJET1.2-5cre1-96::eyfp. Finally, the 5cre1-96::eyfp was recovered by NotI/SpeI digestion of pJET1.2-5cre1-96::eyfp and was cloned into a NotI/SpeI-digested derivative pMS plasmid yielding the final plasmid.

Fungal protoplast transformation

Protoplast transformation of T. reesei was performed as described by Gruber et al. [34]. For the gene replacement of cre1, the plasmid pMS*-cre1-96::eyfp was linearized by NotI digestion and transformed into T. reesei QM6aΔtmus53. For the deletion of cre1-96, the plasmid pMS*-5hph3cre1 was linearized by NotI digestion and transformed into T. reesei Rut-C30Δtmus53. For the constitutive expression of cre1-96 under the control of the promoter of tef1, the plasmid pMS*-ptef::cre1-96 was transformed into T. reesei Rut-C30Δtmus53. Each transformation reaction was added to 40 mL melted, 50 °C warm MEX agar containing 1.2 M D-sorbitol. This mixture was poured into 4 sterile petri dishes, which were incubated at 30 °C for at least 2 h for protoplast regeneration. Appropriate amount of hygromycin B was added to 40 mL melted, 50 °C warm MEX agar containing 1.2 M D-sorbitol and was poured as a 10 mL-overlay on all 4 plates. Transformation plates were further incubated at 30 °C for 2–4 days until colonies were visible. The resulting candidates were subjected to 3 rounds of homokaryon selection by streaking.

Isolation of genomic DNA

Genomic DNA was isolated from approximately 50 mg mycelium in 1 mL CTAB buffer (1.4 M NaCl, 100 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 10 mM EDTA, 2% (w/v) CTAB) by homogenization using a FastPrep(R)-24 cell disrupter (MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, California, USA) followed by a phenol/chloroform extraction. RNA was degraded using RNaseA (Thermo Scientific). DNA was precipitated with isopropanol, washed with 70% (w/v) ethanol, and dissolved in distilled H2O.

Diagnostic PCR analysis

100 ng of chromosomal DNA was used as template in a 25-µL-PCR using GoTaq® G2 polymerase (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Primer sequences are provided in Additional file 7: Table S1 and Additional file 8: Table S2. For subsequent agarose gel electrophoresis of DNA fragments a GeneRuler 1 kb DNA Ladder (Thermo Scientific) was applied for estimation of fragment size. DNA sequencing was performed at Microsynth.

RNA extraction and reverse transcription

Fungal mycelia were homogenized in 1 mL of peqGOLDTriFast DNA/RNA/protein purification system reagent (peqlab VWR, Radnor, Pennsylvania, USA) using a FastPrep(R)-24 cell disrupter (MP Biomedicals). RNA was isolated according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and the concentration was measured using the NanoDrop 1000 (Thermo Scientific). Reverse transcription of the isolated mRNA was carried out using the RevertAidTM H Minus First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Transcript analysis

Quantitative PCR (qPCR) was performed in a Rotor-Gene Q system (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Reactions were performed in technical duplicates or triplicates. The amplification mixture (final volume 15 μL) contained 7.5 μL 2 × iQ SYBR Green Mix (Bio-Rad, Hercules, California, USA), 100 nM forward and reverse primer, and 2.5 μL cDNA (diluted 1:20). Primer sequences and cycling conditions are provided in Table 2. Data normalization using sar1 and act as reference genes and calculations were performed as previously published [35].
Table 2

Primer used for qPCR

Primer name

Sequence 5′–3′

References

actfw

TGAGAGCGGTGGTATCCACG

[35]

actrev

GGTACCACCAGACATGACAATGTTG

[35]

sar1fw

TGGATCGTCAACTGGTTCTACGA

[35]

sar1rev

GCATGTGTAGCAACGTGGTCTTT

[35]

xyr1f

CCCATTCGGCGGAGGATCAG

[35]

xyr1r

CGAATTCTATACAATGGGCACATGGG

[35]

taqxyn1 f

CAGCTATTCGCCTTCCAACAC

[13]

taqxyn1 r

CCAAAGTTGATGGGAGCAGAA

[13]

cbh1f

GATGATGACTACGCCAACATGCTG

[12]

cbh1r

ACGGCACCGGGTGTGG

[12]

cre1_a_f

ACCTCCTGAATCCAACGTCGG

[17]

cre1_a_r

TGGGTGCGAATGTGCCTGG

[17]

bga1f

CGTTTGATCCTTTCGGCGGCT

[19]

bga1r

CCAAAGGTCATGTATATGTTGAAGATGGTC

[19]

gal1f

GGAGGCATGGACCAGGC

[19]

gal1r

GACATGCTTGTTGGAGGTGACG

[19]

xorf

CTGTGACTATGGCAACGAAAAGGAG

[19]

xorr

CACAGCTTGGACACGTGAAGAG

[19]

st RT 1

CCGTCTACCGTCTGTTGTGC

[5]

st RT 2

GAAGTAGGAAAGAACCGCATTG

[5]

In silico prediction of protein domains

The protein sequences of Cre1 (JGI Trichoderma reesei QM6a v2.0 Database, Protein ID 120117) and Cre1-96 (JGI Trichoderma reesei Rut C-30 v1.0 Database, Protein ID 23706) were obtained from the respective genome databases [36, 37]. The identification of the DNA binding domain (i.e. C2H2 zinc finger and linker sequence) was achieved by using the NCBI conserved domain search [38]. Multiple sequence alignment of Cre1-96, Cre1 and its homologues of Aspergillus nidulans (A. nidulans, NCBI Accession ID: XP_663799.1), Aspergillus niger (A. niger, NCBI Accession ID: XP_001399519.1), Neurospora crassa (N. crassa, NCBI Accession ID: XP_961994.1), Trichoderma atroviride (T. atroviride, NCBI Accession ID: XP_013941427.1), Trichoderma virens (T. virens, NCBI Accession ID: XP_013956509.1) and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (S. cerevisiae, NCBI Accession ID: NP_011480.1) was conducted using Clustal Omega [39] and identified conserved amino acids and protein domains. Prediction of the NLS was achieved by applying the NLS Mapper [40] on Cre1 and Cre1-96. For the in silico identification of the transactivation domain, the Nine Amino Acids Transactivation Domain (9aaTAD) Prediction Tool [41] was used [42]. As search specification, the less stringent pattern was chosen as the most adequate pattern for both proteins.

Confocal microscopy

The localization of the eYFP-labelled Cre1-96 was determined by confocal microscopy and image processing using Fiji [43]. Samples were prepared from liquid cultures. Therefore, 106 spores per mL of QM6acre1-96::eyfp were used to inoculate 20 mL of MA medium supplemented with 1% (w/v) d-glucose and 1% (w/v) lactose and incubated at 30 °C and 180 rpm for 16 h. A 10-μL sample was taken and embedded between two glass coverslips (24 × 60, 24 × 24). For the nuclear staining, 4 μL of a 1:10-diluted (distilled water) Hoechst 34580 stain (Thermo Scientific, 5 mg/mL in DMSO) was added before putting the glass coverslip on top of the sample and incubated for 10 min in darkness. Live-cell imaging was performed using a Nikon C1 confocal laser scanning unit sitting on top of a Nikon Eclipse TE2000-E inverted microscope base (Nikon Inc., Melville, New York, USA). An argon ion laser emitting a wavelength of 488 nm excited fluorescent proteins and Hoechst stained nuclei. The emission wavelength was detected with a photomultiplier in a range of 500–530 nm. Laser intensity and illumination time were kept the same for all samples. Pictures were taken as a single picture configuration at a resolution of 1024 × 1024 pixels.

Enzyme assays

Endo-xylanolytic and endo-cellulolytic activities of cultivation supernatants were measured with Xylazyme AX tablet assay and Azo-CMC-Cellulose assay (both Megazyme International Ireland, Wicklow, Ireland) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For the comparison of cellulolytic activities of Rut-C30OEcre1-96 and the cre1-96 deletion, only Rut-C30Δcre1-96 (2) was used due to similar results of previous experiments of this study (e.g. transcript analysis).

Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) and quantitative PCR analysis

T. reesei strain QM6acre1-96::eyfp was grown for 16 h in MEX supplemented with 1% (w/v) d-glucose at 30 °C at 180 rpm. Crosslinking was performed with 1% (w/v) formaldehyde for 15 min at room temperature and gentle shaking every 2–3 min. Quenching was performed by the addition of 125 mM glycine at room temperature for 5 min and gently shaking. Mycelia were filtered by Miracloth, washed with distilled water, dry-pressed between sheets of Whatman paper and frozen in liquid nitrogen. The chromatin shearing and the ChIP protocol were performed according to [44] with the following adaptions. An amount of 100–200 mg of fungal mycelia was grinded in liquid nitrogen and suspended in MNase digestion buffer (50 mM Hepes–KOH pH 7.5, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM CaCl2, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM PMSF, 1× fungal protease inhibitors (Sigma, St. Louis, Missouri, USA)). Chromatin shearing was enzymatically performed by using 0.4 U MNaseI (Sigma,) on 200 μL mycelia aliquots at 37 °C for 13 min. The reaction was stopped by adding 100 μL Lysis Buffer v2 (50 mM Hepes–KOH pH 7.5, 255 mM NaCl, 12 mM EDTA, 2% (w/v) Triton-X100, 0.2% (w/v) Na-deoxcholate, 1 mM PMSF, 1× fungal protease inhibitors (Sigma)). For the precipitation of the protein-antibody complex, an Anti-GFP antibody (ChIP grade; Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and Dynabeads® Protein A magnetic beads (Thermo Scientific) were used. The obtained conjugate was washed 3 times with a low salt buffer (0.1% (w/v) SDS, 1% (w/v) Triton X-100, 2 mM EDTA pH 8.0, 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl), once with a final wash buffer (0.1% (w/v) SDS, 1% (w/v) Triton X-100, 2 mM EDTA pH 8.0, 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 500 mM NaCl) and once with TE buffer. Then, samples were eluted in TES buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA, 1% (w/v) SDS). Protein-bound DNA was treated with Proteinase K (Thermo Scientific) and DNA samples were purified using the MiniElute PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The precipitated DNA was quantified by qPCR performed in iCycler Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad) and the use of a standard curve. A reaction volume of 25 μL including the following compounds: 2× iQ SYBR® Green Supermix (Bio-Rad), 10 μM primers and 5 μL of immunoprecipitated and input DNA (1:5 diluted in EB) or genomic DNA for the standard curve. The annealing temperature was 60 °C and the primer sequences are provided in Table 3. The qPCR cycling protocol and the adequate amounts of reagents were chosen as recommend in the manufacturer’s instructions. All experiments were performed in biological and technical duplicates.
Table 3

Primer used for ChIP-qPCR

Primer name

Sequence 5′–3′

Reference

sar1 3UTR f

TGACGGGGAGAACATGTGCTC

This study

sar1 3UTR r

ATGCGACTCCCACAAGTGGTG

This study

ChIP_xyr1 upstream f

TACACAAGAGCAATGGCCCTAGC

This study

ChIP_xyr1 upstream r

TGGATGGATGGAGAACGGGATG

This study

Chromatin accessibility real-time PCR (CHART-PCR) assays

DNaseI digestions of chromatin and subsequent qPCR analyses were carried out as described before [17]. To be noted, only one of both deletion strains (Rut-C30Δcre1-96 (2)) was used for this analysis due to similar results from previous experiments of this study (e.g. transcript analysis). The qPCR analyses of the DNaseI-treated samples were performed to measure the relative abundance of DNA of the target regions. PCRs were performed in triplicates in a Rotor-Gene Q system (Qiagen) using the reaction mixture (final volume 20 μL) and the cycling conditions as described before [17]. Primer sequences are provided in Table 4. The amount of intact input DNA of each sample was calculated by comparing the threshold values of the PCR amplification plots with a standard curve generated for each primer set using serial dilutions of genomic, undigested DNA. The chromatin accessibility index (CAI) was defined as: CAI = (Dc1 + Dc2)/2Ds, where Ds is the amount of intact DNA detected for each target region, and Dc1 and Dc2 are the amounts of intact DNA detected for the promoter regions of sar1 and act, respectively, which were used as reference genes for normalization.
Table 4

Primer used for CHART-PCR

Primer name

Sequence 5′–3′

References

epiactinTr_f

CTTCCCTCCTTTCCTCCCCCTCCAC

[17]

epiactinTr_r

GCGACAGGTGCACGTACCCTCCATT

[17]

episar1Tr_f

GTCAGGAAATGCCGCACAAGCAAGA

[17]

episar1Tr_r

TGTGTTTTACCGCCTTGGCCTTTGG

[17]

epixyr1_1Tr_f

CCTTTGGCCATCTACACAAGAGCAA

[45]

epixyr1_1Tr_r

CGCAATTTTTATTGCTGTTCGCTTC

[45]

epicbh1_1Tr_f

AAGGGAAACCACCGATAGCAGTGTC

[46]

epicbh1_1Tr_r

TTTCACTTCACCGGAACAAACAAGC

[46]

epixn1_1Tr_f

GCACTCCAAGGCCTTCTCCTGTACT

[46]

epixyn1_1Tr_r

TAGATTGAACGCCACCCGCAATATC

[46]

Abbreviations

aa: 

amino acid

CAI: 

chromatin accessibility index

CCR: 

carbon catabolite repression

CHART-PCR: 

chromatin accessibility real-time PCR

ChIP: 

chromatin immunoprecipitation

CMC: 

carboxymethylcellulose

Cre1: 

carbon catabolite repressor 1

CreA: 

carbon catabolite repressor A

EB: 

elution buffer

eYFP: 

enhanced yellow fluorescent protein

LB: 

lysogeny broth

MA: 

Mandels-Andreotti

MEX: 

malt extract

NES: 

nuclear export signal

NLS: 

nuclear localization signal

qPCR: 

quantitative PCR

TAD: 

transactivation domain

URR: 

upstream regulatory regions

Xyr1: 

xylanase regulator 1

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

AR constructed the plasmids and the fungal strains, performed the growth experiments, the chromatin analyses (ChIP and CHART-PCR), the confocal microscopy, the in silico domain analysis, the transcript analyses, the enzymatic assays, and drafted this manuscript. AGM contributed to the chromatin analyses (ChIP). JS participated in the conception of the study, analysis of data and revision of the manuscript. RLM participated in the conception of the study. ARMA participated in the conception of the study, supervised the experiments, and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge Markku Saloheimo from VTT Finland for providing the Rut-C30Δtmus53 strain. We kindly thank Lena Studt and Harald Berger for the support of the ChIP experiment. We appreciate the help from Daniel Kiesenhofer, Lisa Kappel and Alexander Lichius with the confocal microscope.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article [and its Additional files].

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was funded by two grants from the Austrian Science Fund (FWF): V232 and P24851 given to ARMA. Work at the Fungal Genetics and Genomics Lab was funded by Grant LS12-009 of the NFB Life Science Fund to JS.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute of Chemical, Environmental and Bioscience Engineering, TU Wien, Gumpendorfer Str. 1a, 1060 Vienna, Austria
(2)
Fungal Genetics and Genomics Lab, Department of Applied Genetics and Cell Biology, BOKU-University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Konrad Lorenz Str. 24, 3430 Tulln/Donau, Austria
(3)
Institute of Microbiology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Veterinärplatz 1, 1210 Vienna, Austria

References

  1. Singh A, Mishra P. Overview of problems and potential. In: Microbial pentose utilization—current applications in biotechnology. vol. 33; 1995. p. 1–3.Google Scholar
  2. Kumar R, Singh S, Singh OV. Bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass: biochemical and molecular perspectives. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008;35(5):377–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Singh A, Mishra P. Extraction of pentosans from lignocellulosic materials. In: Microbial pentose utilization—current applications in biotechnology. vol. 33; 1995. p. 71–98.Google Scholar
  4. Aro NPT, Penttilä M. Transcriptional regulation of plant cell wall degradation by filamentous fungi. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2005;29:719–39.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Ivanova C, Bââth JA, Seiboth B, Kubicek CP. Systems analysis of lactose metabolism in Trichoderma reesei identifies a lactose permease that is essential for cellulase induction. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(5):e62631.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Mach-Aigner AR, Pucher ME, Mach RL. D-Xylose as a repressor or inducer of xylanase expression in Hypocrea jecorina (Trichoderma reesei). Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76(6):1770–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Strauss J, Mach RL, Zeilinger S, Hartler G, Stoffler G, Wolschek M, et al. Cre1, the carbon catabolite repressor protein from Trichoderma reesei. FEBS Lett. 1995;376(1–2):103–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Nakari-Setälä T, Paloheimo M, Kallio J, Vehmaanperä J, Penttilä M, Saloheimo M. Genetic modification of carbon catabolite repression in Trichoderma reesei for improved protein production. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75(14):4853–60.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Mach RL, Strauss J, Zeilinger S, Schindler M, Kubicek CP. Carbon catabolite repression of xylanase I (xyn1) gene expression in Trichoderma reesei. Mol Microbiol. 1996;21(6):1273–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Portnoy T, Margeot A, Linke R, Atanasova L, Fekete E, Sandor E, et al. The CRE1 carbon catabolite repressor of the fungus Trichoderma reesei: a master regulator of carbon assimilation. BMC Genomics. 2011;12:269.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Ries L, Belshaw NJ, Ilmén M, Penttilä ME, Alapuranen M, Archer DB. The role of CRE1 in nucleosome positioning within the cbh1 promoter and coding regions of Trichoderma reesei. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;98(2):749–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Stricker AR, Grosstessner-Hain K, Würleitner E, Mach RL. Xyr1 (xylanase regulator 1) regulates both the hydrolytic enzyme system and D-xylose metabolism in Hypocrea jecorina. Eukaryot Cell. 2006;5(12):2128–37.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Mach-Aigner AR, Pucher ME, Steiger MG, Bauer GE, Preis SJ, Mach RL. Transcriptional regulation of xyr1, encoding the main regulator of the xylanolytic and cellulolytic enzyme system in Hypocrea jecorina. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74(21):6554–62.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Montenecourt BS, Eveleigh DE. Production and characteriation of high yielding cellulase mutants of Trichoderma reesei. TAPPI J. 1979;28:101–8.Google Scholar
  15. Ward M. Improving secreted enzyme production by Trichoderma reesei. In: 9th International workshop on Trichoderma and Gliocladium: 2006; Vienna.Google Scholar
  16. Ilmén M, Thrane C, Penttilä M. The glucose repressor gene cre1 of Trichoderma: isolation and expression of a full-length and a truncated mutant form. Mol Gen Genetics. 1996;251(4):451–60.Google Scholar
  17. Mello-de-Sousa TM, Gorsche R, Rassinger A, Pocas-Fonseca MJ, Mach RL, Mach-Aigner AR. A truncated form of the Carbon catabolite repressor 1 increases cellulase production in Trichoderma reesei. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2014;7(1):129.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Seiboth B, Gamauf C, Pail M, Hartl L, Kubicek CP. The D-xylose reductase of Hypocrea jecorina is the major aldose reductase in pentose and D-galactose catabolism and necessary for beta-galactosidase and cellulase induction by lactose. Mol Microbiol. 2007;66(4):890–900.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Stricker AR, Steiger MG, Mach RL. Xyr1 receives the lactose induction signal and regulates lactose metabolism in Hypocrea jecorina. FEBS Lett. 2007;581(21):3915–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Cziferszky A, Mach RL, Kubicek CP. Phosphorylation positively regulates DNA binding of the carbon catabolite repressor Cre1 of Hypocrea jecorina (Trichoderma reesei). J Biol Chem. 2002;277(17):14688–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lichius A, Seidl-Seiboth V, Seiboth B, Kubicek CP. Nucleo-cytoplasmic shuttling dynamics of the transcriptional regulators XYR1 and CRE1 under conditions of cellulase and xylanase gene expression in Trichoderma reesei. Mol Microbiol. 2014;94(5):1162–78.View ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Tilburn J, Sarkar S, Widdick DA, Espeso EA, Orejas M, Mungroo J, et al. The Aspergillus PacC zinc finger transcription factor mediates regulation of both acid- and alkaline-expressed genes by ambient pH. EMBO J. 1995;14(4):779–90.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Cánovas D, Studt L, Marcos AT, Strauss J. High-throughput format for the phenotyping of fungi on solid substrates. Sci Rep. 2017;7:4289.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Sun J, Glass LN. Identification of the CRE-1 cellulotytic regulon in Neurospora crassa. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(9):e25654.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. dos Santos Castro L, Pedersoli WR, Antonieto AC, Steindorff AS, Silva-Rocha R, Martinez-Rossi NM, et al. Comparative metabolism of cellulose, sophorose and glucose in Trichoderma reesei using high-throughput genomic and proteomic analyses. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2014;7(1):41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Derntl C, Gudynaite-Savitch L, Calixte S, White T, Mach RL, Mach-Aigner AR. Mutation of the Xylanase regulator 1 causes a glucose blind hydrolase expressing phenotype in industrially used Trichoderma strains. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2013;6(1):62.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. NetNES 1.1 Server. http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/NetNES/. Accessed 31 May 2017.
  28. Ries L, Beattie SR, Espeso EA, Cramer RA, Goldman GH. Diverse Regulation of CreA Carbon Catabolite Repressor in Aspergillus nidulans. Genetics. 2016;203(1):335–52.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Ries L, Belshaw NJ, Ilmén M, Penttilä ME, Alapuranen M, Archer DB. The role of CRE1 in nucleosome positioning within the cbh1 promoter and coding regions of Trichoderma reesei. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;98(2):749–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Zeilinger S, Schmoll M, Pail M, Mach RL, Kubicek CP. Nucleosome transactions on the Hypocrea jecorina (Trichoderma reesei) cellulase promoter cbh2 associated with cellulase induction. Mol Genet Genomics. 2003;270(1):46–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Steiger MG, Vitikainen M, Uskonen P, Brunner K, Adam G, Pakula T, et al. Transformation system for Hypocrea jecorina (Trichoderma reesei) that favors homologous integration and employs reusable bidirectionally selectable markers. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77(1):114–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Mach RL, Schindler M, Kubicek CP. Transformation of Trichoderma reesei based on hygromycin B resistance using homologous expression signals. Curr Genet. 1994;25(6):567–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Derntl C, Kiesenhofer DP, Mach RL, Mach-Aigner AR. Novel strategies for genomic manipulation of Trichoderma reesei with the purpose of strain engineering. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015;81(18):6314–23.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Gruber F, Visser J, Kubicek CP, de Graaff LH. Cloning of the Trichoderma reesei pyrG gene and its use as a homologous marker for a high-frequency transformation system. Curr Genet. 1990;18(5):447–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Steiger MG, Mach RL, Mach-Aigner AR. An accurate normalization strategy for RT-qPCR in Hypocrea jecorina (Trichoderma reesei). J Biotechnol. 2010;145(1):30–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. JGI Trichoderma reesei v2.0 Genome Database. http://genome.jgi.doe.gov/Trire2/Trire2.home.html. Accessed 28 April 2014.
  37. JGI Trichoderma reesei Rut C-30 v1.0 Genome Database. http://genome.jgi.doe.gov/TrireRUTC30_1/TrireRUTC30_1.home.html. Accessed 28 April 2014.
  38. NCBI Conserved Domain Search. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/cdd/wrpsb.cgi. Accessed 01 June 2014.
  39. Clustal Omega. http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalo/. Accessed 13 June 2017.
  40. cNLS Mapper. http://nls-mapper.iab.keio.ac.jp/cgi-bin/NLS_Mapper_form.cgi. Accessed 08 September 2014.
  41. Nine Amino Acids Transactivation Domain (9aaTAD) Prediction Tool. http://www.med.muni.cz/9aaTAD/. Accessed 25 May 2017.
  42. Piskacek S, Gregor M, Nemethova M, Grabner M, Kovarik P, Piskacek M. Nine-amino-acid transactivation domain: establishment and prediction utilities. Genomics. 2007;89(6):756–68.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9:676–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Lando D, Endesfelder U, Berger H, Subramanian L, Dunne PD, McColl J, et al. Quantitative single-molecule microscopy reveals that CENP-ACnp1 depostiton occurs during G2 in fission yeast. Open Biol. 2012;2(7):120078.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Mello-de-Sousa TM, Rassinger A, Derntl C, Poças-Fonseca MJ, Mach-Aigner AR, Mach RL. The relation between chromatin status, Xyr1 and cellulase expression in Trichoderma reesei. Curr Genomics. 2016;17:1–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Mello-de-Sousa TM, Rassinger A, Pucher ME, dos Santos Castro L, Persinoti GF, Silva-Rocha R, et al. The impact of chromatin remodelling on cellulase expression in Trichoderma reesei. BMC Genomics. 2015;16:588.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

Advertisement