Skip to main content

Deletion of the small GTPase rac1 in Trichoderma reesei provokes hyperbranching and impacts growth and cellulase production



Trichoderma reesei is widely known for its enormous protein secretion capacity and as an industrially relevant producer of cellulases and hemicellulases. Over the last decades, rational strain engineering was applied to further enhance homologous and heterologous enzyme yields. The introduction of hyperbranching is believed to increase protein secretion, since most exocytosis is located at the hyphal apical tip. There are several genetic modifications which can cause hyperbranching, for example the deletion of the small Rho GTPase rac. Rac plays a crucial role in actin dynamics and is involved in polarisation of the cell during germination and apical extension of the hyphae.


We deleted rac1 in a T. reesei strain with an ectopically overexpressed endoglucanase, CEL12A, under Pcdna1 control. This deletion provoked a hyperbranching phenotype and strong apolar growth during germination and in mature hyphae. The strains displayed dichotomous branching and shorter total mycelium length with a larger hyphal diameter. Δrac1 strains exhibited a decreased radial growth on solid media. Biomass formation in liquid cultures was carbon source dependent; similar to the reference strain during growth on lactose, increased on d-glucose and slightly enhanced on cellulose. While extracellular cellulase activities remained at parental strain levels on d-glucose and cellulose, the specific activity on lactose cultures was increased up to three times at 72 h accompanied by an upregulation of transcription of the main cellulases. Although the morphology of the Δrac1 strains was considerably altered, the viscosity of the culture broth in fed-batch cultivations were not significantly different in comparison to the parental strain.


Deletion of the small Rho GTPase rac1 changes the morphology of the hyphae and provokes hyperbranching without affecting viscosity, independent of the carbon source. In contrast, biomass formation and cellulase production are altered in a carbon source dependent manner in the Δrac1 strains.


Trichoderma reesei is an industrial producer of cellulases and hemicellulases and a model organism for plant biomass degradation. Its potential for recombinant protein production lies within its high protein secretion capacity for cellulases which reaches up to 100 g per litre and its ability to grow on cheap lignocellulosic materials [1, 2]. While native cellulase production is induction dependent and can be activated by carbon sources like cellulose, cellulosic materials, lactose; and abolished on d-glucose [3]. Rational strain engineering to optimise and enhance protein production is of substantial industrial interest, since the capacity for protein secretion is high but yields for heterologously expressed proteins are often only low or moderate [4]. Tools to influence macro-morphology and morphological engineering can be valuable for optimising the production of metabolites and proteins. Modulation of macro-morphology is widely established for other industrially used filamentous fungi such as Aspergillus species [5,6,7], whereas the macro-morphology of T. reesei has been addressed in only a few studies so far [8, 9]. Usually, two main forms of macro-morphology are described in submerged cultures, hyphal pellets and freely dispersed mycelium. Two modes of action for how biomass agglomerations are formed are known, coagulative and non-coagulative agglomeration types [10, 11]. In the coagulative agglomeration type, the conidiospores agglomerate, in the non-coagulative type, the hyphae agglomerate after the spores have already germinated. However, often filamentous fungi can show both forms depending on the cultivation conditions [11, 12]. Pellet formation is associated with higher branching frequencies compared to dispersed mycelium [13, 14]. The optimal production morphology depends on the desired product and both macro-morphologies have their advantages and disadvantages. Pellets are not supplied evenly due to the poorer accessibility of nutrients, whereas long unsheltered hyphae of dispersed mycelium are less resistant to shear stress. The macro-morphology influences the viscosity of the broth [15], which can, in turn, affect supply of the fungus with nutrients by making even distribution through stirring harder. A compact but still dispersed growth could decrease viscosity [16], though there are no clear indicators for predicting viscosity changes.

It is widely accepted that most of the proteins are secreted from the hyphal tip during apical growth of the hyphae [13, 17, 18]. Additionally, some studies also found secretion at the septa [19,20,21]. The question arises, if a hyperbrancher could increase protein production by increasing the number of tips. Several studies were conducted to find a correlation between the number of tips and the protein secretion—with contradictory results. Some found a positive correlation [7, 22], some determined no correlation [13, 16, 23, 24]. The secretion pathway was subject of many studies, but our understanding is still incomplete [25]. Roughly, extracellular proteins are translocated to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), where they are folded and glycosylated before they are packed in vesicles and transported to the Golgi apparatus. After further modifications, the proteins are transported in vesicles towards the plasma membrane and released to the exterior of the cell [26,27,28]. Protein secretion is influenced by many factors e.g. the capacity of the ER, the cell internal redox state, the carbon source, the growth phase, the target protein and maybe also by the hyphal architecture [29]. On a genetic level, the regulation involves a range of proteins, among them small GTPases of the Ras superfamily including Rho, Cdc42 and Rac. Those signal transduction proteins are not only involved in vesicle trafficking, they also play a crucial role in the polarisation of the cell [30, 31], especially regarding actin and microtubule dynamics [32].

Hyperbranching can be a consequence of a number of different mutations, e.g. the deletion of vel1 in T. reesei, where the enhanced number of tips was accompanied by a reduced growth rate, loss of conidiation and impairment of cellulase and hemicellulase expression on inducing carbon sources [33]. Most frequently, it is a consequence of dichotomous branching (besides lateral branching) introduced by deletion or repression of genes coding for actin, formin, polarisome components or certain Rho GTPases [23]. The hyperbranching is provoked by direct or indirect perturbation of actin assembly and the interlinked polarised growth of the cell. A transversion of the act1 reading frame in Neurospora crassa impaired actin assembly at the apical tip and produced a hyperbrancher phenotype, presumably due to meddling with Ca2+-signalling and vesicle trafficking, respectively [34]. The deletion of the formin SepA in Aspergillus nidulans caused a temperature sensitive hyperbrancher, depolarised growth and perturbed septa formation [35, 36].

The deletion of the small GTPase racA was found to produce a hyperbranching phenotype in A. niger without reduced biomass formation [23, 37]. Kwon et al. [23] showed that deletion of racA and the associated hyperbranching had no effect on the native protein production of A. niger, on the other hand, Fiedler et al. [38] established a production platform for A. niger, in which the deletion of racA enhanced protein secretion of the overexpressed glucoamylase. In both studies the hyperbranching was accompanied by apolar growth of the hyphae and a reduced ability to form pellets. In A. niger, racA is mainly present at the apical tip of growing hyphae, especially during germination [37]. Interestingly, the dominant activation of RacA, led to an altered morphology due to actin localisation defects [23]. Similar hyperbranching phenotypes for rac deletion strains were found in A. nidulans [32], N. crassa [39] and Penicillium marneffei [40, 41].

The aim of this study was to morphologically engineer T. reesei by deletion of its racA homologue and to characterize the deletion strains with regard to their altered morphology, the effect on native and recombinant cellulase production and viscosity properties in bioreactor cultivations. Therefore, the endoglucanase CEL12A was put under control of the constitutive promoter of cDNA1, which enables monitoring of cellulase production on the repressing carbon source d-glucose [42, 43].


Identification and deletion of the A. niger racA homologue in T. reesei

The A. niger Rho GTPase RacA encoded by An11g10030 [37] was used as query in a blastp search in the NCBI database to identify the T. reesei RAC1 encoded by the gene tre47055 (query cover 97%, E value 1e−111, identities 77%). The next most similar protein encoded in the T. reesei genome is a homologue of Cdc42 (query cover 95%, E value 2e−91, identities 65%). Prior to the deletion of rac1 we introduced an overexpression cassette for CEL12A under PcDNA1 control in the T. reesei QM9414 Δtku70 strain to be able to measure cellulase production also during growth on d-glucose [43]. This construct was randomly integrated and one strain, with similar endoglucanase activity and biomass formation to a T. reesei QM9414 cel12a+ strain [43], was selected as our reference strain T. reesei K1. Rac1 was knocked-out in K1 and 14 of 20 PCR screened transformants were found to be deleted.

Morphology of T. reeseirac1 strains

During growth on solid medium all 14 ∆rac1 T. reesei strains exhibited an impaired, more compact radial growth with more aerial mycelium in comparison to the K1 reference strain, as depicted in Fig. 1. ∆rac1 colonies had sharp edges, whereas colonies of the reference strain K1 showed regular growth with fringed edges. Subsequently, the strains were grown in liquid cultures on the cellulase repressing carbon source d-glucose and the two cellulase inducing carbon sources lactose and cellulose. Samples were drawn at different time points to investigate the influence on rac1 loss on the fungal macro-morphology (Fig. 2). The Δrac1 strains showed strong apolar growth on all tested carbon sources, especially visible during the germination stage. After 9 h of incubation the spores of the Δrac1 strains were swollen and many extension points on the spore surface were formed, seemingly not orientated to a polarisation axis. Noticeably, not all of those germ tubes formed filamentous branches. The pictures in Fig. 2 at 27 h represent mature mycelium. On all carbon sources the central hyphae of the deletion strains were shorter with a thicker diameter, more apical tips and longer branches. Furthermore, the mycelium of those strains seemed to be more dispersed than the reference strain and did not collapse into biomass clumps. The evaluation of the morphological characteristics of the mature hyphae after 27 h of growth on lactose as carbon source is summarised in Table 1. Although the morphology is affected in the ∆rac1 strains, regular septa formation could be observed when stained with calcofluor white (data not shown).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Colony morphology of T. reesei K1 and a representative Δrac1 strain on potato dextrose agar plate. A serial dilution of 104 to 102 spores of the reference strain K1 (a) and ∆rac1 (b) was applied on PDA plates containing 0.1% Triton X-100 and incubated for 72 h at 28 °C

Fig. 2
figure 2

Morphological phenotypes of T. reesei K1 and Δrac1 strains in liquid cultures on different carbon sources. Δrac1 strains were compared to the cellulase overexpressing reference K1 at 9 and 27 h in shake flask cultivations on d-glucose, lactose and cellulose. At 9 h the spores were germinating in the shake flasks. At 27 h the mycelium was matured. The mycelium in the cellulose cultures was stained with cotton blue for enhancing the contrast

Table 1 Comparative image analysis with Image J of hyphal morphologies from T. reeseirac1 strains compared to reference strain K1 during growth on lactose for 27 h, mean values and standard deviation are given

Growth and cellulase secretion of T. reeseirac1 strains

Since radial growth on solid media was impaired in all T. reeseirac1, we tested the biomass formation in liquid cultures. Depending on the carbon source, the deletion of rac1 resulted in different biomass formation. As depicted in Fig. 3a, the biomass formation was enhanced for Δrac1 strains on d-glucose compared to the reference strain K1. The biomass accumulation was twice as high at earlier time points. On cellulose the biomass, represented by the amount of internal protein, was also enhanced at all time points. Although the effect size was small, the values were confirmed to be significantly different with a t-test (p < 0.05). Interestingly, on lactose the biomass formation was the same as for the reference strain.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Growth, protein secretion and cellulase activity measurements of T. reesei K1 and Δrac1 liquid cultivations on different carbon sources. Five independently generated ∆rac1 strains and three biological replicates of the K1 strain were used for all liquid culture experiments. a Biomass formation on d-glucose, lactose and cellulose. Since cellulose is an insoluble carbon source, biomass formation is represented by the amount of internal protein. b Cellulase activity per biomass. Activity in the supernatants was determined by Azo-CMC liquid assay and was related to the amount of biomass. c Total protein in lactose supernatants determined by a Bradford assay. d Specific activity of lactose supernatant, the cellulase activity was plotted against the amount of total protein in the supernatant

For further characterization, the cellulase activities of the supernatants were monitored (Fig. 3b). Lactose and cellulose are inducing carbon sources and activate native cellulase expression as opposed to it’s repression on d-glucose. In the latter case, the cellulase activity depends solely on CEL12A overexpression, which is under the control of the cdna1 promoter and therefore independent of carbon source induction [42]. For cellulose, the volumetric cellulase activities of the supernatants of the deletion strains were in the same range as for the reference strain K1. Due to the small effect size, the ratios of both strains were equal on cellulose. For d-glucose cultures the volumetric cellulase activity resulting from the CEL12A expression were similar but, due to the increased biomass formation a reduced activity per biomass ratio was found. In contrast, on lactose higher cellulase activities were observed, peaking at 72 h at about three times the level of the reference strain K1. Notably, the total protein content in the supernatants in the lactose cultures was similar for either strains at 72 h (Fig. 3c). In conclusion, more active cellulases per total secreted protein were present in Δrac1 cultures (Fig. 3d). Additionally, ∆rac1 strains accumulated significantly more secreted proteins at the end of the shake flask cultivation.

Loss of rac1 leads to increased cellulase transcript levels during growth on lactose

Increased cellulase activity in lactose cultures at 72 h raised the question; whether the secretion of proteins present in the cells is more efficient, or if the expression of the cellulases is enhanced as well. Therefore, transcript levels of the major cellulase cel7a (cbh1) and cel12a were examined at 48 and 72 h on lactose by qPCR. In addition, we tested the expression of the two housekeeping genes tef1 (encoding translation elongation factor) and sar1 (encoding an ARF family GTPase) as internal reference genes. Transcript levels for both were consistent, and sar1 was chosen for normalization.

The transcriptomic data showed an increase of expression of both monitored cellulases (Fig. 4). The expression levels of cel7a were about three times higher compared to the reference strain K1. The upregulation of cel12a was in the same range as cel7a although cel12a transcripts can also originate from the overexpression under Pcnda1 control. Since members of the Cdc42 small GTPases share a high sequence identity and some overlapping functions with Rac proteins [31], we tested if a rac1 deletion might influence its expression. Interestingly, the expression of the monitored cdc42 homologue in T. reesei was not affected at all. Also, the expression of actin was not significantly altered, despite the drastic morphological changes and the possible actin assembly disturbance at the hyphal tips.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Relative mRNA transcript levels of selected genes of T. reesei Δrac1 in relation to parental K1 strains. Strains were grown for 48 and 72 h on lactose as carbon source. Three technical replicates of K1 and three biological replicates of Δrac1 strains were grown for 48 and 72 h on lactose as carbon source. All expression data were normalized to sar1, then Δrac1 data was related to K1 values at the same time points

Viscosity in fed-batch cultivation is not affected by rac1 deletion

To investigate whether the altered morphology induced by hyperbranching would have an impact on the viscosity of the cultivation broth, fed-batch cultivations were performed. The strains were cultivated in a fed-batch started with d-glucose and fed with lactose. In Additional file 1: Figure S1 the process data of all twelve fed batch cultivations are illustrated. Similar to the shake flask cultivations, the biomass formation was the same for Δrac1 strains and the reference strain during growth on mainly lactose (Fig. 5). Although the morphology of ∆rac1 strains was strongly affected and a slight tendency of viscosity increase can be observed in the data, there were no statistically significant differences between the deletion and reference strains, as shown in Fig. 5.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Biomass and viscosity of fed-batch cultures from T. reesei QM9414 and Δrac1. The batches were started with d-glucose, starved for 1 h and then fed with lactose. Samples were taken after 100 h of lactose feeding. The measured angular velocities were integrated and normed to T. reesei QM9414


Everything comes at a price: ∆rac1 is a hyperbrancher but loses polar growth

The T. reesei rac1 deletion strains grew in a highly apolar manner from spore to hyphae, similar to the effects observed in other filamentous fungi [23, 32, 37, 39,40,41]. Usually, following the activation of the dormant spore, materials for cell expansion are deposited at the cortex while a polarisation axis is established [44]. Actin cables polymerise at a defined spot and a germ tube emerges, until finally the first septum is initiated, forming the first filament. Typically, branches are formed subapically and oriented on a new polarisation axis [32, 45]. In T. reesei Δrac1 strains, the spores seemingly could not establish a proper polarisation axis and randomly formed germ tubes across the surface. Microscopic analysis showed that the visible organelles of mature hyphae seem to be “swollen”, which is a symptom of failed actin cable formation and insufficient localised transport to the apical tip [32, 46]. The actin cable formation is regulated, among others, by the small Rho GTPases, especially Rac plays a role in regulation of the actin polymerisation [31, 47] and Rac localises actin nucleation at the cell periphery like the apical tip [48]. Treatment of A. nidulans with anti-actin drugs provoked a similar swelling of the hyphal apex and a stop of exocytosis directed to the tip [49,50,51]. Since components like chitin protofilaments and glucans are transported via the cell internal microtubule and actin skeleton [52], cell wall components like hydrophobins, manno-proteins, and polysaccharides may not be effectively deposited at the tip and accumulate in the absence of Rac. This observation is in line with the suggestion by Momany [44], that in a hyperbrancher, cell wall materials are faster produced than transported to the apical tip or the cell wall. Furthermore, Rac introduces branches to the actin filaments by activation of the Arp2/3 complex [53], as does Cdc42. Although both are involved in the activation of the Arp2/3 complex over different signalling pathways, Rac by WAVE-family proteins [54] and Cdc42 by WASP-family proteins [55], the T. reesei cdc42 could not compensate the defect caused by the rac1 deletion.

Changes without changes: altered morphology while viscosity unaffected

Unbranched, parallelly organised actin filaments that form filopodia-like structures can sense the extracellular matrix and also the surfaces of other cells [56]. When actin assembly and therefore the formation of filopodia-like structures is disrupted, the hyphae may lose their ability to adhere to one another and to surfaces. This could explain the observed reduced agglomeration of the hyphae, which may already start at the germinating spores. Despite the morphological changes, our data suggest that the viscosity of the cultivation broth did not change significantly. The tendency of the shorter and more compact mycelium to disperse more evenly in the medium was proposed to be a possibility to improve viscosity in the cultivation process [16]. However, there is no model to predict viscosity changes related to morphological changes so far, therefore, it is necessary to perform in vivo measurements.

Increased cellulase production of Δrac1 strains only on lactose

Interestingly, the increased cellulase secretion of Δrac1 strains compared to the parental strain was specific for lactose and included an upregulation of the native cellulase cel7a and cel12a which is present also as a reporter in this strain under control of the cDNA1 promoter. No improvement of cellulase secretion was found during growth on cellulose which is similar to the result found for A. niger on native protein production [23], although no additional overexpressed reporter was employed in the A. niger study. In a follow-up study, Fiedler et al. [38] found that secretion of the glucoamylase GlaA, which was put under the control of the tuneable Tet-on system in a glucoamylase deleted strain, could be enhanced in an A. niger ΔracA strain whereas the total amount of secreted enzymes stayed the same. They speculated that the secretion of non-essential cargo was increased by the hyperbrancher and that this is balanced by a feed-back mechanism termed RESS (repression under secretion stress) [57, 58]. As a consequence the overloading of the secretion pathway in the ER leads to an activation of the Unfolded Protein Response (UPR). Within a limited range, the UPR can actually improve protein production by enhancing the ER capacity for glycosylation and resulting in a faster throughput [59, 60]. In T. reesei, RESS leads to a selective down-regulation of genes encoding cellulases via their native promoters [58]. Therefore, it remains unclear how the observed increase in transcription levels for cel7a, whose product CEL7A constitutes about 60% of the T. reesei secretome, and cel12a can be explained.

Trichoderma reesei, picky when it comes to protein expression

Interestingly, expression and secretion of a heterologous protein in T. reesei can differ from native cellulases [61, 62]. Nykänen et al. overexpressed a barley cysteine endopeptidase (EPB) and found differences in expression level, secretion capacity, and localisation in comparison to the native CBH1. Whereas EPB was only found at the apical tips, CBH1 was localised over the plasma membrane suggesting that the secretion of the foreign protein is limited to certain areas like the apical tip, whereas for native enzymes other secretory pathways are possible [19, 63]. Knowing that, it would be interesting to see whether the effect found on lactose could be repeated with a heterologous reporter. However, in this study we confirmed that an increased number of branches does not mandatorily correlate to a change in protein secretion.


Rac1 is not essential to T. reesei and the deletion caused apolar growth resulting in a hyperbranching phenotype. The hyperbranching drastically changed the morphology of the fungus and cellulase activity was enhanced three times during growth on lactose. Growth on d-glucose and cellulose did not trigger an increase in cellulase protein secretion, however, the deletion did not decrease production either. The introduction of stronger expression systems may support overproduction of enzymes on those carbon sources as well. The less agglomerated germinating spores and mycelium, plus the unchanged viscosity, may serve as a valuable platform for further genetic optimisations. The effect of rac1 deletion on vesicle transport, cell wall composition, crosslinking, actin dynamics, and the polarity of the cell wall remain interesting questions for further studies.

Materials and methods

Strains and culture conditions

The parental strain throughout the study was T. reesei QM9414 Δtku70 [64] and it was used to construct the reference strain K1 and the Δrac1 deletion strains. The strains were grown on potato dextrose agar (PDA, Difco) at 28 °C. For shake flask cultivations spores were harvested with a NaCl-Tween solution (8.5 g/L NaCl, 0.9 g/L Tween-80) from PDA plates and the concentration was determined with a spectrometer at OD600. 50 mL Mandels-Andreotti medium (1.4 g/L (NH4)2SO4, 2 g/L KH2PO4, 0.3 g/L MgSO4, 0.3 g/L CaCl2, 0.3 g/L urea, 1 g/L peptone, 10 g/L carbon source, 20 mL/L trace elements pH 5.8 (5 mg/L FeSO4*7 H2O, 1.6 mg/L MnSO4*H2O, 1.4 mg/L ZnSO4*H2O and 2 mg/L CoCl2*2 H2O), pH adjusted to 5.5) in 250 mL flasks were inoculated with a final concentration of 106 spores/mL and incubated at 28 °C in a rotary shaker at 250 rpm. Liquid cultures were grown with d-glucose, lactose or Avicel (cellulose) as carbon source. Lactose cultures were additionally supplemented with 0.5 g/L Tween-80. Liquid cultivations were performed in three technical replicates of the K1 strain and five individual Δrac1 strains.

Escherichia coli Top10 (Clontech) were used for plasmid construction and amplification. E. coli was grown in lysogeny broth medium (5 g/L peptone, 10 g/L yeast extract, 5 g/L NaCl) containing 100 µg/mL ampicillin.

Vector construction

All primers and their sequences are listed in Additional file 2: Table S1. The cel12a overexpression vector pK1 is based on pLH_hph [65]. A 1000 bp promotor region of cdna1 was amplified from T. reesei QM9414 genomic DNA by PCR using oligonucleotides Pcdna1_fw and _rv. The fragment was inserted into an XhoI/ClaI digested pLH_hph vector. Cel12a coding and terminator region were amplified from genomic DNA using oligonucleotides cel12a_fw and _rv. The pLH_hph_Pcdna1 vector was linearized by ClaI digestion and the cel12a PCR fragment was inserted. For change of the selection marker, the plasmid was amplified by the primers Inf_pK1_NtR_fw and _rv without the hygromycin B resistance cassette. The nourseothricin cassette was amplified using standard M13 primers from vector pBM_nat1. In this vector the dominant nourseothricin resistance marker nat1 from Streptomyces noursei is under control of the T. reesei pgi1 (encoding phosphoglucose isomerase) promoter region (Benjamin Metz, Robert H. Bischof and Bernhard Seiboth, unpublished results). The PCR fragments were fused with the NEBuilder HF DNA Assembly Kit (NEB) resulting in the final vector pK1 (pLH_Pcdna1_cel12a_nat1).

The rac1 deletion vector was cloned in two steps: A pUC19 vector (Clontech Inc.) was opened by BamHI digest and a 4.9 kb PCR amplicon of rac1 including promoter, coding region and terminator was introduced by recombinational cloning using the NEBuilder HF DNA Assembly Kit. In a second step, the coding region of rac1 was removed by PCR and the hygromycin B resistance cassette, amplified from pLH_hph, was inserted between the rac1 promoter and terminator region.

PCR fragments were gel purified with a QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (QIAGEN), restrictions enzymes were supplied by NEB, PCR was performed using Phusion High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and plasmids isolated with the PureYield Plasmid Midiprep System (Promega). Plasmids inserts were verified by sequencing (Microsynth AG). Plasmid maps are provided in Additional file 3: Figure S2.

Transformation of T. reesei and genotyping

Transformation was performed by electroporation [66]. Transformants were purified via conidiospores on selective plates containing 0.1% (w/v) Triton X-100 in two rounds before genetic analysis. For selection 100 µg/mL hygromycin B (Sigma) or 50 µg/mL nourseothricin (Jena Bioscience GmbH) were added to PDA plates. The T. reesei QM9414 Δtku70 [64] was transformed with pK1. Expression of CEL12A from the PcDNA1-cel12a expression cassette in the transformants was verified by a carboxymethyl cellulose plate assay, compared to a T. reesei QM9414 cel12a+ reference strain [43] and strain K1 selected for further experiments.

Rac1 was deleted in T. reesei K1. pDELrac1 was linearized with SspI (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 10–15 µg DNA were transformed by electroporation. The homologous integration of the rac1 deletion cassette was tested by PCR from genomic DNA, using the oligonucleotides Gen_DEL_rac1_fw and _rv. PCR of deletion strains resulted in a 3.45 kb band, whereas the parental strain showed a 2.99 kb band (data not shown). All primers for genotyping are listed in Additional file 2: Table S2.

DNA and RNA extraction, reverse transcription and qPCR

For isolating DNA, mycelium was scratched off a PDA plate with a spatula and DNA was extracted according to a quick extraction protocol [67]. Biomass samples for RNA extraction from liquid cultures were filtered with a Miracloth filter, shock frozen with liquid nitrogen and stored at − 80 °C. For the RNA isolation the peqGOLD TriFast mix (PeqLab) was used according to the protocol. The RevertAid H Minus First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Fermentas) was used for cDNA synthesis. All qPCRs were performed with the Luna Universal qPCR Master Mix (NEB). Results were evaluated with REST 2007 [68] freeware by QIAGEN. All primers for qPCR are listed in Additional file 2: Table S3.

Determination of biomass, extracellular protein and enzyme activities

The biomass in the d-glucose and lactose liquid media was determined by filtering onto Glass Microfiber Filter GF/C, Diameter 47 mm (Whatman). After filtration, the filter was dried on 80 °C. In cellulose cultures the biomass was measured indirectly by the amount of internal protein. 1 mL culture broth was centrifuged for 30 min. The supernatant was discarded and the pellet was washed with distilled water. The pellet was resuspended in 1 mL 1 M NaOH and incubated for 2 h and 1000 rpm at room temperature. The suspension was centrifuged for 10 min and the protein content of the supernatant was determined by the Biorad protein assay reagent (BioRad).

Supernatants of liquid culture were filtered through a Miracloth filter and stored at − 20 °C. The protein of the lactose cultures supernatants was measured with the Pierce™ BCA Protein Assay Kit using the microtiter plate protocol (Thermo Fisher). The endo-1,4-β-d-glucanase activity (endo-cellulase) of the filtered supernatants from all carbon sources was determined by the Azo-CMC-Assay (Megazymes). The reaction was down-scaled to 200 µL aliquots of the supernatant. All reactions were performed in duplicates from biological triplicates in case of the reference K1 and quintuplicates in case of the deletion strains.

For a carboxymethyl cellulose activity assay on agar plates, transformants were grown on a defined medium agar plates (6 g/L (NH4)2SO4, 1 g/L MgSO4, 10 g/L sodium citrate, 20 mL/L trace element solution (see Mandels Andreotti medium), 10 g/L d-glucose, 15 g/L agar noble, pH 5.5) supplemented with 0.5% carboxymethyl cellulose and incubated for 8 h at 28 °C. Afterwards the agar plates were stained with a 0.2% Congo Red solution for 15 min, washed with 1 M NaCl and the clearing zone of each transformant resulting from the cellulase activity determined.


Samples of three biological replicates of Δrac1 and three technical replicates of the K1 strain were each drawn from shake flask cultivations on MA medium with the respective carbon sources d-glucose, lactose or cellulose. For cellulose samples a cotton blue staining was applied: 1 µL cotton blue dye (Sigma-Aldrich) was added to 10 µL liquid culture, and incubated at room temperature for 5 min. The samples were examined with a Leica Microscope DMi8.

For hyphae characterisation, three replicates of K1 and Δrac1 were grown on MA + lactose for 27 h at 28 °C and 250 rpm. Mycelium was spread on a microscope slide and was examined with a Leica Microscope DMi8 with a 63× objective. The pictures were transferred to Image J, where length, diameter and branching frequencies were determined.

Fed batch cultivation

A 100 mL preculture was grown on batch medium in a shake flask (10 g/L (NH4)2SO4, 4 g/L KH2PO4, 0.5 g/L MgSO4*7 H2O, 0.4 g/L CaCl2, 0.5 g/L lactose, 20 g/L d-glucose, aqueous extract from 40 g wheat bran, 7 mg/L FeSO4*7 H2O, 2 mg/L MnSO4*H2O, 7 mg/L ZnSO4*H2O, pH 4.0). The cultivation was started in 1 L batch culture with d-glucose as main carbon source (2%) and its depletion was monitored by CO2-generation. After the d-glucose levels decreased to 0.2 g/L, the batch was starved for another hour before the feeding with lactose began at a rate of 0.25 g/L*h from a 10% lactose solution. After 100 h of feeding, samples were drawn for determination of biomass formation and viscosity of the cultivation broth. The pH of 4 was regulated by addition of 12% w/v NH4OH, temperature was 28 °C, aeration rate was 0.5 vvm and the impeller speed was 1000 rpm. A silicon-based antifoam was used during feeding. For determination of the dry weight 1.8 mL of batch culture was drawn with a syringe and centrifuged for 10 min at 10,000 rpm in an Eppendorf tube. The supernatant was removed, the pellet was washed two times with 0.9% NaCl and dried at 100 °C for 24 h. QM9414 was measured in technical triplicates, ∆rac1 was measured in biological triplicates and each biological in technical triplicates (Additional file 1: Figure S1).

Viscosity measurements

Viscosity was measured with a Malvern Kinexus Lab + KNX2110 viscosimeter. The angular velocities were 0.9503, 1.196, 1.506, 1.896, 2.387, 3.005, 3.783, 4.763, 5.996, 7.549 and 9.503 rad/s. The angular velocities were integrated and normed to T. reesei QM9414.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its Additional files.


  1. Cherry JR, Fidantsef AL. Directed evolution of industrial enzymes: an update. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2003;14(4):438–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bischof RH, Ramoni J, Seiboth B. Cellulases and beyond: the first 70 years of the enzyme producer Trichoderma reesei. Microb Cell Fact. 2016;15:106.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kubicek CP, Mikus M, Schuster A, Schmoll M, Seiboth B. Metabolic engineering strategies for the improvement of cellulase production by Hypocrea jecorina. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2009;2:19.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nevalainen H, Peterson R. Making recombinant proteins in filamentous fungi—are we expecting too much? Front Microbiol. 2014;5:75.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Cairns T, Zheng X, Zheng P, Sun J, Meyer V. Moulding the mould: understanding and reprogramming filamentous fungal growth and morphogenesis for next generation cell factories. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2019;12:77.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Amanullah A, Blair R, Nienow AW, Thomas CR. Effects of agitation intensity on mycelial morphology and protein production in chemostat cultures of recombinant Aspergillus oryzae. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1999;62(4):434–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Amanullah A, Christensen LH, Hansen K, Nienow AW, Thomas CR. Dependence of morphology on agitation intensity in fed-batch cultures of Aspergillus oryzae and its implications for recombinant protein production. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2002;77(7):815–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Callow NV, Ju LK. Promoting pellet growth of Trichoderma reesei Rut C30 by surfactants for easy separation and enhanced cellulase production. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2012;50(6–7):311–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Domingues FC, Queiroz JA, Cabral JMS, Fonseca LP. The influence of culture conditions on mycelial structure and cellulase production by Trichoderma reesei Rut C-30. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2000;26(5–6):394–401.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dynesen J, Nielsen J. Surface hydrophobicity of Aspergillus nidulans conidiospores and its role in pellet formation. Biotechnol Prog. 2003;19(3):1049–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang J, Zhang J. The filamentous fungal pellet and forces driving its formation. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2015;36(6):1066–77.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Veiter L, Rajamanickam V, Herwig C. The filamentous fungal pellet—relationship between morphology and productivity. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018;102(7):2997–3006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. McIntyre M, Müller C, Dynesen J, Nielsen J. Metabolic engineering of the morphology of Aspergillus. In: Nielsen J, Eggeling L, Dynesen J, Gárdonyi M, Gill RT, De Graaff AA, et al., editors. Advances in biochemical bngineering/biotechnology. 73rd ed. Springer: Berlin; 2001. p. 103–28.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wucherpfennig T, Kiep KA, Driouch H, Wittmann C, Krull R. Morphology and rheology in filamentous cultivations. Adv Appl Microbiol. 2010;72(1):89–136.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rodríguez Porcel EM, Casas López JL, Sánchez Pérez JA, Fernández Sevilla JM, Chisti Y. Effects of pellet morphology on broth rheology in fermentations of Aspergillus terreus. Biochem Eng J. 2005;26(2–3):139–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Booking SP, Wiebe MG, Robson GD, Hansen K, Christiansen LH, Trinci APJ. Effect of branch frequency in Aspergillus oryzae on protein secretion and culture viscosity. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1999;65(6):638–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Steinberg G. Hyphal growth: a tale of motors, lipids, and the spitzenkörper. Eukaryot Cell. 2007;6(3):351–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Wösten HAB, Moukha SM, Sietsma JH, Wessels JG. Localization of growth and secretion of proteins in Aspergillus niger. J Gen Microbiol. 1991;137(1):2017–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hayakawa Y, Ishikawa E, Shoji JYA, Nakano H, Kitamoto K. Septum-directed secretion in the filamentous fungus Aspergillus oryzae. Mol Microbiol. 2011;81(1):40–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gordon CL, Khalaj V, Ram AFJ, Archer DB, Brookman JL, Trinci APJ, et al. Glucoamylase:green fluorescent protein fusions to monitor protein secretion in Aspergillus niger. Microbiology. 2000;146(2):415–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fiedler MRM, Cairns TC, Koch O, Kubisch C, Meyer V. Conditional expression of the small GTPase ArfA impacts secretion, morphology, growth, and actin ring position in Aspergillus niger. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:878.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Te Biesebeke R, Record E, Van Biezen N, Heerikhuisen M, Franken A, Punt PJ, et al. Branching mutants of Aspergillus oryzae with improved amylase and protease production on solid substrates. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2005;69(1):44–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kwon MJ, Nitsche BM, Arentshorst M, Jørgensen TR, Ram AFJ, Meyer V. The transcriptomic signature of RacA activation and inactivation provides new insights into the morphogenetic network of Aspergillus niger. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(7):e68946.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Müller C, Mcintyre M, Hansen K, Nielsen J. Metabolic engineering of the morphology of Aspergillus oryzae by altering chitin synthesis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68(4):1827–36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Saloheimo M, Pakula TM. The cargo and the transport system: secreted proteins and protein secretion in Trichoderma reesei (Hypocrea jecorina). Microbiology. 2012;158(1):46–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Spang A. Membrane traffic in the secretory pathway: the life cycle of a transport vesicle. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2008;65(18):2781–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Spang A. The road not taken: less traveled roads from the TGN to the plasma membrane. Membranes (Basel). 2015;5(1):84–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Feyder S, De Craene JO, Bär S, Bertazzi DL, Friant S. Membrane trafficking in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae model. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16(1):1509–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Nevalainen KMH, Te’o VSJ, Bergquist PL. Heterologous protein expression in filamentous fungi. Trends Biotechnol. 2005;23:468–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Takeshita N. Coordinated process of polarized growth in filamentous fungi. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2016;80(9):1693–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Jaffe AB, Hall A. Rho GTPases: biochemistry and biology. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2005;21(1):247–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Virag A, Lee MP, Si H, Harris SD. Regulation of hyphal morphogenesis by cdc42 and rac1 homologues in Aspergillus nidulans. Mol Microbiol. 2007;66(6):1579–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Aghcheh RK, Németh Z, Atanasova L, Fekete E, Paholcsek M, Sándor E, et al. The VELVET a orthologue VEL1 of Trichoderma reesei regulates fungal development and is essential for cellulase gene expression. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(11):e112799.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Virag A, Griffiths AJF. A mutation in the Neurospora crassa actin gene results in multiple defects in tip growth and branching. Fungal Genet Biol. 2004;41(2):213–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sharpless KE, Harris SD. Functional characterization and localization of the Aspergillus nidulans formin SEPA. Mol Biol Cell. 2002;13(2):469–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Harris SD, Hamer L, Sharpless KE, Hamer JE. The Aspergillus nidulans SepA gene encodes an FH1/2 protein involved in cytokinesis and the maintenance of cellular polarity. EMBO J. 1997;16(12):3474–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Kwon MJ, Arentshorst M, Roos ED, Van Den Hondel CAMJJ, Meyer V, Ram AFJ. Functional characterization of Rho GTPases in Aspergillus niger uncovers conserved and diverged roles of Rho proteins within filamentous fungi. Mol Microbiol. 2011;79(5):1151–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Fiedler MRM, Barthel L, Kubisch C, Nai C, Meyer V. Construction of an improved Aspergillus niger platform for enhanced glucoamylase secretion. Microb Cell Fact. 2018;17(1):95–106.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Lichius A, Goryachev AB, Fricker MD, Obara B, Castro-Longoria E, Read ND. CDC-42 and RAC-1 regulate opposite chemotropisms in Neurospora crassa. J Cell Sci. 2014;127(9):1953–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Boyce KJ, Hynes MJ, Andrianopoulos A. The Ras and Rho GTPases genetically interact to co-ordinately regulate polarity during development in Penicillium marneffei. Mol Microbiol. 2005;55(5):1487–501.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Boyce KJ. Control of morphogenesis and actin localization by the Penicillium marneffei RAC homolog. J Cell Sci. 2003;116(1):1249–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Nakari-Setälä T, Penttilä M. Production of Trichoderma reesei cellulases glucose-containing media. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995;61(10):3650–5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Uzbas F, Sezerman U, Hartl L, Kubicek CP, Seiboth B. A homologous production system for Trichoderma reesei secreted proteins in a cellulase-free background. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;93(4):1601–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Momany M. Polarity in filamentous fungi: establishment, maintenance and new axes. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2002;5(6):580–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Harris SD, Momany M. Polarity in filamentous fungi: moving beyond the yeast paradigm. Fungal Genet Biol. 2004;41(4):391–400.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Berepiki A, Lichius A, Read ND. Actin organization and dynamics in filamentous fungi. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2011;9(12):876–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Nguyen LK, Kholodenko BN, von Kriegsheim A. Rac1 and RhoA: networks, loops and bistability. Small GTPases. 2016;9(4):316–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Innocenti M, Zucconi A, Disanza A, Frittoli E, Areces LB, Steffen A, et al. Abi1 is essential for the formation and activation of a WAVE2 signalling complex. Nat Cell Biol. 2004;6(4):319–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Torralba S, Raudaskoski M, Pedregosa AM, Laborda F. Effect of cytochalasin A on apical growth, actin cytoskeleton organization and enzyme secretion in Aspergillus nidulans. Microbiology. 1998;144(1):45–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Taheri-Talesh N, Horio T, Araujo-Bazán L, Dou X, Espeso EA, Peñalva MA, et al. The tip growth apparatus of Aspergillus nidulans. Mol Biol Cell. 2008;19(4):1439–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Pantazopoulou A, Penalva MA. Organization and dynamics of the Aspergillus nidulans Golgi during apical extension and mitosis. Mol Biol Cell. 2009;20(20):4335–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Gow NAR, Latge J, Munro CA. The fungal cell wall: structure, biosynthesis and function. Microbiol Spectr. 2017;5(3):1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Millard TH, Sharp SJ, Machesky LM. Signalling to actin assembly via the WASP (Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein)-family proteins and the Arp2/3 complex. Biochem J. 2004;380(1):1–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Eden S, Rohatgi R, Podtelejnikov AV, Mann M, Kirschner MW. Mechanism of regulation of WAVE1-induced actin nucleation by Rac1 and Nck. Nature. 2002;418(6899):790–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Ho HYH, Rohatgi R, Lebensohn AM, Le M, Li J, Gygi SP, et al. Toca-1 mediates Cdc42-dependent actin nucleation by activating the N-WASP-WIP complex. Cell. 2004;118(2):203–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Vignjevic D, Yarar D, Welch MD, Peloquin J, Svitkina T, Borisy GG. Formation of filopodia-like bundles in vitro from a dendritic network. J Cell Biol. 2003;160(6):951–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Carvalho NDSP, Jørgensen TR, Arentshorst M, Nitsche BM, van den Hondel CAMJJ, Archer DB, et al. Genome-wide expression analysis upon constitutive activation of the HacA bZIP transcription factor in Aspergillus niger reveals a coordinated cellular response to counteract ER stress. BMC Genomics. 2012;13(1):350–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Pakula TM, Laxell M, Huuskonen A, Uusitalo J, Saloheimo M, Penttilä M. The effects of drugs inhibiting protein secretion in the filamentous fungus. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(45):45011–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Travers KJ, Patil CK, Wodicka L, Lockhart DJ, Weissman JS, Walter P. Functional and genomic analyses reveal an essential coordination between the unfolded protein response and ER-associated degradation. Cell. 2000;101(3):249–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Guillemette T, van Peij NNME, Goosen T, Lanthaler K, Robson GD, van den Hondel CAMJJ, et al. Genomic analysis of the secretion stress response in the enzyme-producing cell factory Aspergillus niger. BMC Genomics. 2007;8(1):158–74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Nykänen MJ, Raudaskoski M, Nevalainen H, Mikkonen A. Maturation of barley cysteine endopeptidase expressed in Trichoderma reesei is distorted by incomplete processing. Can J Microbiol. 2002;48(2):138–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Nykänen M, Saarelainen R, Raudaskoski M, Nevalainen KMH, Mikkonen A. Expression and secretion of barley cysteine endopeptidase B and cellobiohydrolase I in Trichoderma reesei. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997;63(12):4929–37.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Valkonen M, Kalkman ER, Saloheimo M, Penttilä M, Read ND, Duncan RR. Spatially segregated SNARE protein interactions in living fungal cells. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(1):22775–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Guangtao Z, Hartl L, Schuster A, Polak S, Schmoll M, Wang T, et al. Gene targeting in a nonhomologous end joining deficient Hypocrea jecorina. J Biotechnol. 2009;139(2):146–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Hartl L, Kubicek CP, Seiboth B. Induction of the gal pathway and cellulase genes involves no transcriptional inducer function of the galactokinase in Hypocrea jecorina. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(25):18654–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Schuster A, Bruno KS, Collett JR, Baker SE, Seiboth B, Kubicek CP, et al. A versatile toolkit for high throughput functional genomics with Trichoderma reesei. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2012;5(1):1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Liu D, Coloe S, Baird R, Pedersen J. Rapid mini-preparation of fungal DNA for PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:471.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Pfaffl MW. Relative expression software tool (REST(C)) for group-wise comparison and statistical analysis of relative expression results in real-time PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(9):e36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Georg Schirrmacher of Clariant Produkte Deutschland GmbH for helpful discussions in the initial stages of the project.


This work has been supported by the Austrian Federal Ministry of Digital and Economic Affairs (BMWD), the Austrian Federal Ministry of Traffic (BMVIT), the Styrian Business Promotion Agency (SFG), the Standortagentur Tirol, and the Government of Lower Austria and Business Agency Vienna through the COMET-Funding Program managed by the Austrian Research Promotion Agency FFG to BS. The authors acknowledge the TU Wien Bibliothek for financial support through its Open Access Funding Programme.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



FW and BS designed the study and supervised the project. EF generated all strains and characterised them as described in the manuscript. CG supervised and analysed the results of the fed batch cultivations and viscosity measurements. EF wrote the manuscript. FW and BS edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernhard Seiboth.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

Bioreactor process data of fed batch cultivations.

Additional file 2.

Primers used in this study. Table S1. Primers for vector cloning. Table S2. Primers for T. reesei genotyping. Table S3. Primers for qPCR with primer efficiency.

Additional file 3: Figure S2.

Plasmid maps of the vectors.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fitz, E., Gamauf, C., Seiboth, B. et al. Deletion of the small GTPase rac1 in Trichoderma reesei provokes hyperbranching and impacts growth and cellulase production. Fungal Biol Biotechnol 6, 16 (2019).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: