Open Access

The capacity of Aspergillus niger to sense and respond to cell wall stress requires at least three transcription factors: RlmA, MsnA and CrzA

  • Markus RM Fiedler1,
  • Annett Lorenz2,
  • Benjamin M Nitsche1, 2,
  • Cees AMJJ van den Hondel3,
  • Arthur FJ Ram2, 4 and
  • Vera Meyer1, 2, 4Email author
Fungal Biology and Biotechnology20141:5

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40694-014-0005-8

Received: 2 April 2014

Accepted: 18 August 2014

Published: 1 December 2014

Abstract

Background

Cell wall integrity, vesicle transport and protein secretion are key factors contributing to the vitality and productivity of filamentous fungal cell factories such as Aspergillus niger. In order to pioneer rational strain improvement programs, fundamental knowledge on the genetic basis of these processes is required. The aim of the present study was thus to unravel survival strategies of A. niger when challenged with compounds interfering directly or indirectly with its cell wall integrity: calcofluor white, caspofungin, aureobasidin A, FK506 and fenpropimorph.

Results

Transcriptomics signatures of A. niger and phenotypic analyses of selected null mutant strains were used to predict regulator proteins mediating the survival responses against these stressors. This integrated approach allowed us to reconstruct a model for the cell wall salvage gene network of A. niger that ensures survival of the fungus upon cell surface stress. The model predicts that (i) caspofungin and aureobasidin A induce the cell wall integrity pathway as a main compensatory response via induction of RhoB and RhoD, respectively, eventually activating the mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase MkkA and the transcription factor RlmA. (ii) RlmA is the main transcription factor required for the protection against calcofluor white but it cooperates with MsnA and CrzA to ensure survival of A. niger when challenged with caspofungin and aureobasidin A. (iii) Membrane stress provoked by aureobasidin A via disturbance of sphingolipid synthesis induces cell wall stress, whereas fenpropimorph-induced disturbance of ergosterol synthesis does not.

Conclusion

The present work uncovered a sophisticated defence system of A. niger which employs at least three transcription factors - RlmA, MsnA and CrzA – to protect itself against cell wall stress. The transcriptomic data furthermore predicts a fourth transfactor, SrbA, which seems to be specifically important to survive fenpropimorph-induced cell membrane stress. Future studies will disclose how these regulators are interlocked in different signaling pathways to secure survival of A. niger under different cell wall stress conditions.

Keywords

Cell signalingCell wallChitinDrug actionFungiTranscriptomics

Background

Fungi are among the most serious biological threats to humans and plants. They kill as many people as tuberculosis and malaria and spoil about 10% of the world’s annual harvest [1],[2]. Although several antifungal drugs are available, their success is limited due to toxicity, a narrow spectrum of activity, detrimental drug interactions and the development of drug resistance [2]. To mitigate this public threat, safe and effective antifungal drugs are therefore needed. Key to this is a better understanding on how fungi sense and respond to antifungal drugs.

A preferred target for new antifungal drugs is the fungal cell wall as its composition is fundamentally different from bacterial and plant cell walls. In addition, the cell wall from yeast and filamentous fungi display significant architectural differences which can potentially be exploited. Whereas β-1,3-glucans, β-1,4 glucans, β-1,6-glucans, chitin, chitosan and glycoproteins are major constituents found in both, α-1,3-glucans and galactomannans are specific for filamentous fungi. Furthermore, chitin is much more abundant in cell walls of filamentous fungi [3]-[6]. At least three signaling pathways have been shown to be involved in the cell wall compensatory response in the yeast model Saccharomyces cerevisiae when confronted with cell wall disturbing compounds: the Pkc1p-Slt2p signaling pathway (also named cell wall integrity (CWI) pathway) mediated by the transcription factors Rlm1p and Swi4p/Swi6p, the general stress response pathway mediated by Msn2p/Msn4p, and the calcium/calcineurin pathway mediated by Crz1p [7],[8]. Whereas cell wall stress responses are well studied and understood in S. cerevisiae, much less is known from Aspergilli, a genus comprising many human and plant pathogenic filamentous fungi. Components of the CWI signaling cascade, the general stress response pathway and the calcium/calcineurin pathway are, however, conserved among Aspergilli [9]-[13].

Using A. niger as a model system, we recently studied its defense strategies against cell-surface acting compounds such as caspofungin (CA, inhibitor of β-1,3-glucan synthesis), fenpropimorph (FP, inhibitor of ergosterol synthesis), the antifungal protein AFP (inhibitor of chitin synthesis) and calcofluor white (CFW, inhibitor of chitin microfibril assembly) [9],[12],[14]. Common to these compounds is that they induce the CWI pathway in A. niger as compensatory response. By activation of this signaling pathway, cell wall reinforcing genes such as the agsA gene (encoding α-1,3-glucan synthase) become transcriptionally activated through the RlmA transcription factor, the ortholog of the S. cerevisiae Rlm1p protein [12],[14],[15]. Most surprisingly, this cell wall salvage mechanism is sufficient to ensure survival of A. niger when subjected to CFW [12] but not when stressed with the antifungal protein AFP. Although both compounds target cell wall chitin and induce expression of RlmA and its effector genes via the CWI pathway, this defense strategy is not the most appropriate one to protect A. niger against AFP. Instead, triggering the calcium/calcineurin signaling pathway which in turn induces expression of the chitin synthase gene chsD confers a higher protection to A. niger against AFP [9]. These observations suggest that the CWI pathway of A. niger is, as in S. cerevisiae, not the only compensatory mechanism important for the repair of compromised cell walls.

To obtain a more comprehensive view on the cellular responses that allow A. niger to adapt to and survive to cell wall stress conditions, we characterized in this study its transcriptional adaptation program when stressed with the calcium/calcineurin signaling inhibitor FK506 and with the inhibitor of sphingolipid synthesis aureobasidin A (AbaA). Block of sphingolipid synthesis by AbaA has been shown to trigger protein kinase C signaling resulting in activation of Slt2p, the terminal MAP kinase of the CWI pathway in S. cerevisiae [16]. The experimental approach of the present study was similar to that of our previous work, where we determined the transcriptomic fingerprint of A. niger when stressed with CA and FP, respectively [14]. The identical approach allowed us to directly compare the data from both studies and enabled the identification of general survival and antifungal-specific stress responses. In brief, young germlings of A. niger were cultivated in bioreactors to ensure controlled, reproducible and equal growth conditions. Antifungals were added at sublethal concentrations that permitted A. niger to adapt to the growth-inhibitory effects and to respond with the formation of new (sub)apical branches. We also determined the transcriptomic and phenotypic consequences of inactivating the rlmA gene in A. niger. Overall, our transcriptomic data led to the conclusion that in addition to RlmA, MsnA, a predicted Msn2p orthologue, as well as CrzA are important for A. niger to withstand cell wall stress conditions. We therefore characterized the function of MsnA and CrzA for cell survival of A. niger by analyzing respective null strains.

Results

Survival responses of A. niger against AbaA and FK506. Spores of the A. niger wild-type strain N402 were allowed to germinate after which they were treated with different concentrations of the sphingolipid biosynthesis inhibitor AbaA and the inhibitor of calcium/calcineurin signaling FK506. As previously reported, sublethality provokes a morphological response of A. niger germlings, including the formation of (sub)apical branches thereby reflecting an adaptation program of A. niger to the cell wall stress condition [14]. We therefore determined sublethal concentrations of AbaA and FK506 and studied the morphological responses of A. niger germlings in a small scale format (5 ml, data not shown). Based on this preliminary experiment, we determined that sublethal concentrations for the bioreactor scale are 2 μg/ml for AbaA and 1.28 μg/ml for FK506, respectively (working volume 500 ml). Here, 1 × 106 spores/ml were cultivated in Fermentation medium (FM), whereby the dissolved oxygen tension was used as an indicator for equal growth conditions in the different bioreactor runs (data not shown). A. niger spores were allowed to germinate for 5 h, after which 2 μg/ml AbaA or 1.28 μg/ml FK506 were added. After an additional hour of cultivation, samples were taken to microscopically determine the BI-value, (giving the percentage of germlings displaying (sub)apical branches (n > 100)) and to isolate RNA for transcriptomic analyses. As displayed in Table 1, the addition of AbaA and FK506 increased the BI value about 4-fold and 2-fold, respectively, whereby both compounds also significantly inhibited germ tube elongation.
Table 1

The effect of AbaA (2 μg/ml) and FK506 (1,28 μg/ml) on A. niger germ tube formation and elongation

Sample

BI (%)

Mean BI (%)

Polarity axes (%)

Mean length (μM)

N = 1

N = 2

N = 3

NCAbaA

2

3 ± 1

89

10

1

20.9 ± 0.9

2

3

AbaA

14

13 ± 1

77

20

3

14.4 ± 0.1

13

NCFK506

5

5 ± 1

93

7

0

18.8 ± 1.8

4

FK506

12

11 ± 3

73

24

4

11.7 ± 0

9

At least A. niger 100 germlings were counted per single fermentation run to analyze the number of germ tubes present. From each two or three independent fermentation runs, a mean BI was calculated. AbaA, cells treated with aureobasidin A; FK506, cells treated with FK506; NCAbaA, cells neither treated with AbaA or FK506, negative control for AbaA (solvent ethanol); NCFK506, cells neither treated with AbaA or FK506, negative control for FK506 (solvent DMSO). N = number of germ tubes per germling.

RNA samples extracted from duplicate cultures of AbaA-, FK506-, and nontreated samples were used for transcriptomic comparison. Raw chip data was normalized together with our previously published microarray data for CA- and FP-treated samples [14] to allow direct comparison (see Methods). Differential gene expression was evaluated by moderated t-statistics using a false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05. Note that a minimal fold-change criterion was not applied for the identification of differentially expressed genes, as fold-changes not necessarily relate to biological relevance [17],[18]. The complete list of differentially expressed genes of AbaA-, FK506-, CA-, FP- treated samples including fold change and statistical significance is given in the Additional file 1 and Additional file 2. A total of 236, 96, 141, and 24 genes out of 13,989 A. niger genes were identified as differentially expressed upon exposure to AbaA, FK506, CA, and FP. Most of the responsive genes were up-regulated (179, 49, 139 and 22). The differentially expressed genes were grouped according to FunCat [19] (Table 2) and the predicted protein functions [20] revisited by BlastP analysis (Additional files 3, 4, 5 and 6).
Table 2

FunCat classification of A. niger genes responsive to the treatment with caspofungin (CA), aureobasidin A (AbaA), FK506 and fenpropimorph (FP)

Functional category

AbaA

FK506

CA a

FP a

Sum of differentially expressed genes

236

96

141

24

Number of up-regulated genes

179

49

139

22

Number of down-regulated genes

57

47

2

2

Metabolism

42

11

26

16

Energy

2

2

2

-

Cell cycle and DNA processing

6

-

-

-

Transcription

14

3

3

-

Protein synthesis

4

-

1

-

Protein fate

10

7

23

1

Protein with binding function or cofactor requirement

3

1

-

-

Cellular transport, transport facilitation and transport routes

16

8

13

1

Cellular communication/signal transduction mechanism

5

1

4

1

Cell rescue, defense and virulence

3

3

4

-

Interaction with the environment

1

6

-

-

Cell fate

3

-

-

-

Biogenesis of cellular components

4

-

2

-

Unclassified proteins

123

54

63

5

An annotated list of all genes, including fold change, p- and q-value and classification can be found in Additional file 2. a: microarray data from [14].

Transcriptome response of A. niger to aureobasidin A. The cyclic depsipeptide aureobasidin A interferes with fungal sphingolipid metabolism by blocking the Golgi-localized enzyme inositolphosphorylceramide (IPC) synthase [21], which synthetizes inositol phosphoceramide, a main precursor for sphingolipids. AbaA-induced block of sphingolipid synthesis in S. cerevisiae has multiple consequences: the transport of proteins from the ER to the plasma membrane is inhibited, the functionality of nutrient transporters at the plasma membrane as well as plasma membrane integrity is compromised, and actin assembly as well as chitin deposition are disturbed [22],[23]. AbaA therefore activates the MAP kinase Slt2p of the CWI pathway and the TORC2-Slm1/2p-Ypk1p-Orm1/2p cascade as compensatory responses in S. cerevisiae [24]-[26]. The transcriptome data suggest that similar processes were affected in A. niger germlings when stressed with AbaA: proteins predicted to function in (i) lipid biosynthesis, (ii) vesicle transport from the ER to the Golgi, (iii) chitin, α-1,3-glucan and β-1,3-glucan synthesis and remodeling, (iv) actin polarization and (v) nutrient transport were significantly up-regulated in AbaA-treated A. niger cells (Figure 1A and B and Additional file 3). Worth highlighting are the following ORFs as they are predicted to function as regulatory proteins: (i) An02g01180, a predicted diacylglycerol pyrophosphate phosphatase and ortholog of Dpp1p, which synthesizes the secondary messenger diacylglycerol (DAG), the activator of mammalian and fungal protein kinase C of the CWI pathway [27], (ii) An02g08000, a predicted G-protein alpha subunit (Gpa2p ortholog) important for cAMP-protein kinase A signaling in S. cerevisiae and activator of the transcription factors Msn2/4p [7], (iii) An07g05960, encoding the Msn4p ortholog, (iv) RhoD (Rho4p ortholog), encoding a Rho GTPase important for cell wall integrity, septum formation and CFW resistance in A. niger [13], (v) SrgA (Sec4p ortholog), a Rab GTPase important for secretion, polarity maintenance and CA resistance of A. niger [14],[28], (vi) An13g01040, a CA-responsive gene of A. niger [14] encoding a putative Rab-geranylgeranyltransferase (Bet2p ortholog), which provides a membrane attachment moiety for Sec4p thus ensuring vesicle transport between ER and Golgi in S. cerevisiae and (vii) An05g01070, the ortholog of Rsb1p, a flippase that transports the sphingolipid signaling molecules phytosphingosine (PHS) and dihydroxysphingosine (DHS) across membranes of S. cerevisiae [29]. Both PHS and DHS are located upstream of IPC in the sphingolipid biosynthesis pathway and activate ubiquitin-dependent proteasomal protein degradation during heat stress-induced transient cell cycle arrest in S. cerevisiae [30],[31]. As expression of eight A. niger genes predicted to function in proteasomal protein degradation were also up-regulated upon AbaA treatment (Figure 1B and Additional file 3) suggests that the mode of action of AbaA as well as the cellular function of sphingolipids might be similar in S. cerevisiae and A. niger. Finally, the transcriptomic signature of A. niger also pointed towards a general stress response of A. niger upon AbaA treatment, because orthologs to stress-related transcription factors of S. cerevisiae such as Asg1p (An07g07050), Hap1p (An15g02080) and Hal9p (An12g09020) displayed significant up-regulation.
Figure 1

The transcriptomic response of A. niger towards aureobasidin A. (A) Sphingolipid synthesis pathway and the site of action of aureobasidin A (AbaA). (B) Selected aureobasidin A responsive genes clustered into different functional categories (based on Additional file 3).

Transcriptome response of A. niger to FK506. FK506 is a macrolide lactone that blocks calcium/calcineurin signaling in S. cerevisiae in response to high cytosolic calcium levels by inhibiting the protein phosphatase calcineurin. Calcineurin is an activator of the transcription factor Crz1p, which drives expression of more than hundred genes including genes that encode the Ca2+ pumps Pmc1p and Pmr1/2, the β-1,3-glucan synthase Fks2p or other transcription factors such as Hal1p [32]. Additionally, calcineurin can repress the activity of proteins, including the vacuolar calcium exchanger Vcx1p, in a Crz1p-independent manner [33]. In contrast, CrzA, the Crz1p ortholog of A. nidulans is a positive regulator of the vcxA gene (VCX1 ortholog) and chsB encoding a chitin synthase [34]. Whereas the function of CrzA has not been studied yet in A. niger, it was demonstrated that elevated calcium levels induce expression of the chitin synthase encoding gene chsD [9]. Consistent with a role of CrzA for calcium homeostasis in A. niger is the observation that treatment of A. niger germlings with FK506 provoked up-regulation of ORFs encoding VcxA homologs (An19g00340, An19g00330, An19g00320) and a predicted calcium pump (PmcA, An19g00350). In addition, expression of other ion transporters were affected as well including predicted Mg2+ and Zn2+ transporters (An01g01950, An05g00640, An12g10320) (Figure 2A and B and Additional file 3).
Figure 2

The transcriptomic response of A. niger towards FK506. (A) Schematic overview of the calcineurin singalling pathway and the site of action of FK506. (B) Selected FK506 responsive genes clustered into different functional categories (based on Additional file 4).

Calcium has a regulatory function for several transporting steps in the constitutive secretory pathway in eukaryotes [35]. Congruently, twelve genes predicted to function in protein folding, protein maturation and vesicle trafficking were differentially expressed upon FK506 treatment of A. niger germlings, eleven of which displayed increased expression and nine of which are also responsive genes to the treatment of A. niger with the ER-stressing agents DTT and tunicamycin [36], e.g. genes involved in signal peptide cleavage (An09g05420), protein translocation from and to the ER (An03g04940, An02g01510, An08g00740), glycosylation and quality control (An15g03330, An03g04410, An02g14930) or functioning as chaperones (An01g08420/ClxA and An01g04600/PrpA). Surprisingly, none of the FK506-responsive genes could be directly attributed to cell wall remodeling although two predicted G-protein coupled receptors were differentially expressed (An04g02930 and An02g01560/GprD). GprD shows similarity to the human LPA2 (EDG4) protein which acts as specific receptor for lysophosphatidic acid to activate calcium signaling and downstream protein kinase C [37]. Supportively, GprD has been predicted to integrate stress signals via the calcineurin pathway in A. fumigatus [38] which, however has not been observed in A. nidulans [39].

Transcriptome response of A. niger to caspofungin. Our transcriptomic fingerprint of CA-treated A. niger germlings has been published previously [14]. However, we decided to revisit the dataset using a false discovery rate FDR of 0.05 as it is a more stringent cut-off criterion compared with the fold change criterion of 1.5. The rationale behind was to perform a statistically more significant analysis and to directly compare the transcriptomic signature of CA-treated germlings with the datasets of AbaA- and FK506-treated cells for the identification of commonly regulated genes. Basically, the CA-responsive dataset changed from 172 genes [14] to 141 genes (this study). Figure 3A and Additional file 5 highlight key processes and genes which ensured survival of A. niger upon CA treatment. In brief, CA likely provoked a remodeling of A. niger cell walls by stimulating transcription of members of the CWI signaling pathway: RhoB (regulator of α-1,3 glucan synthase), An10g00490 (Rho-GAP), An18g04590 (Rho-GDP dissociation inhibitor) as well as the protein kinase kinase MkkA. Consistently, 20 genes functioning in cell wall synthesis and remodeling were up-regulated including genes involved in chitin, α-1,3-glucan and β-1,6-glucan synthesis as also identified previously [14]. The secretory pathway and cytoskeleton are fundamental in transport of cell wall synthetizing enzymes to the hyphal tip. 17 genes belonging to the secretory pathway were congruently up-regulated (Additional file 5), among which were the GTPases SrgA and SrgB as well as An13g01040, a predicted geranlygeranlytransferase and ortholog of Bet2p, which geranylates several secretory pathway GTPases in S. cerevisiae [40]-[42]. Likewise, seven genes encoding proteins involved in cytoskeleton organization and polarization displayed increased expression values, e.g. the Arp2/3 complex (An01g05510, An18g06590, An08g06410) and tropomyosin (An13g00760) to name but a few.
Figure 3

The transcriptomic response of A. niger towards caspofungin and fenpropimorph. (A) Selected caspofungin (CA) responsive genes clustered into different functional categories (based on Additional file 5). (B) Schematic overview of the ergosterol synthesis pathway and the site of action of fenpropimorph (FP). (C) Selected fenpropimorph responsive genes clustered into different functional categories (based on Additional file 6).

Previously not identified was a group of four genes coding for proteins having a function in proteasomal degradation, i.e. An18g06700 (Pre7p ortholog), An18g06680 (Pre4p ortholog) and An04g01870 (Pre1p ortholog) and An14g00180 (Rpt6p ortholog; Additional file 5).

Transcriptome response of A. niger to fenpropimorph. FP is an inhibitor of ergosterol biosynthesis in S. cerevisiae by inhibiting sterol C-14 reductase (ERG24 gene) and sterol C-8 isomerase (ERG2 gene) [43]. Expression of only 24 genes was modulated in A. niger upon FP treatment, among which was the predicted Erg2p ortholog, which suggests that FP exerts a similar mode of action in A. niger. (Figure 3B and C and Additional file 6). 14 of the responsive genes are indeed predicted to function in lipid metabolism and were all up-regulated upon FP stress: (i) SrbA, a transcription factor shown to control iron and ergosterol homeostasis in A. fumigatus [44], (ii) genes involved in β-oxidation (An08g05400, An17g01150, An15g01280, An08g07520, An16g04520, An14g00990), (iii) genes involved in fatty acid biosynthesis (An16g05340, An07g03290, An15g02830) and (iv) genes predicted to function in lipid transport across the peroxisomal, mitochondrial and plasma membrane (An18g01590, An04g00740, An01g12380). Hence, remodeling plasma membranes via lipid degradation and de novo synthesis might be the most appropriate compensatory response of A. niger to withstand FP-mediated inhibition of ergosterol homeostasis. In agreement, pyruvate carboxylase (An15g02820), a protein fueling the Krebs cycle was up-regulated, possibly reflecting the higher need of acetyl-CoA for fatty acid biosynthesis.

The role of RlmA in the defense response against cell surface stress. We have previously shown that the survival response of A. niger against the cell wall disturbing compounds CFW, CA, FP and AFP involves up-regulation of the α-1,3-glucan synthase AgsA, which is mediated by the activity of the transcription factor RlmA [14],[15]. In order to test whether RlmA is of general importance for the defense against these four antifungals as well as AbaA and FK506, liquid growth inhibition assays were performed using the rlmA deletion strain MA47.1 [12] and the wild type strain N402 as test strains (see Methods). To our surprise, the ΔrlmA strain was only susceptible towards the chitin inhibitor CFW but not towards the other five compounds (Figure 4), suggesting that RlmA might not be the only transcription factor necessary to counteract cell wall and cell membrane stress.
Figure 4

The role of RlmA in counteracting antifungals. 104 spores of strains N402 (filled symbols) and MA47.1 (empty symbols) were cultivated in 200 μl MM medium supplemented with 0.003% yeast extract for 30 h at 30°C in microtiter plates in the presence () or absence (▲) of different antifungals. The data for calcofluor white, caspofungin, aureobasidin A, FK506, AFP and fenpropimorph are shown in panel A, B, C, D, E and F, respectively. For each compound, the same volume of its solvent was used for the negative control. The final concentration of the compounds is indicated in the legend and given in μg/ml.

To investigate the RlmA loss-of-function phenotype in more detail, the transcriptomic signatures of the ΔrlmA strain was compared with that of the wild-type. Both strains were allowed to germinate in bioreactor cultivations as described above but were not stressed with any antifungal compound. After a total cultivation of 6 h, samples were taken for RNA extraction and microarray hybridization. In total, 329 genes were found to be differentially expressed, whereby 205 displayed increased and 124 genes decreased expression in the ΔrlmA strain when compared with the wild-type strain (Additional file 2). This transcriptomic fingerprint included genes involved in cell wall remodeling (4 genes), protein secretion (21 genes), cytoskeleton remodelling (5 genes), proteasome function (14 genes) and vacuolar integrity (4 genes, Figure 5A and Additional file 7). Most interestingly, 54 of the 329 responsive genes in the ΔrlmA strain were overlapping with the responsive gene set of the wild-type strain when stressed with CA (Figure 5B). The complete set of overlapping genes is provided in Additional file 8. Some of the up-regulated genes are briefly summarized as follows: the secretion-related GTPases SrgA and SrgB, the protein disulfide isomerase TigA, a subunit of the SEC61 complex (An01g11630), the ER dolichyl-phosphate manosyltransferase DpmA, subunits of the actin nucleation complex Arp2/3 (An01g05510, An18g06590), tropomyosin TpmA, the tubulin-specific chaperone TbcA and proteasomal degradation proteins (An18g06700, An14g00180, An18g06680). Overlapping and up-regulated in the CA-treated wild-type but down-regulated in the ΔrlmA strain was the α-1,3-glucan synthase AgsE, thus strongly indicating that this gene is a direct target of RlmA and its regulation is merely RlmA-dependent. Interestingly, deletion of the rlmA gene also caused down-regulation of An18g05830, the predicted nuclear pore protein karyopherin Kap121 ortholog, known to import stress-related transcription factors in S. cerevisiae such as Pdr1p (pleiotropic drug resistance), Aft1p (iron depletion, DNA replication stress) and Yap1p (oxidative stress) [45]-[47].
Figure 5

Deletion of rlmA provokes a stress response which is similar to treatment of the wild-type with caspofungin. (A) Responsive genes to rlmA deletion clustered into different functional categories (based on Additional file 7). (B and C) Venn diagrams of induced (black), repressed (grey) and up- or down-regulated (italic) genes for the wild type treated with caspofungin versus the wild type (wt + CA vs. wt), the ∆rlmA strain versus the wild-type (∆rlmA vs. wt) and the wild-type treated and non-treated with aureobasidin A (wt + AbaA vs. wt).

This dataset and its comparison with that of the wild-type led us to two hypotheses: First, RlmA is not the only cell wall stress related transcription factor as deletion of RlmA causes only down-regulation of one cell wall gene (agsA), whereas CA-induced stress in the wild-type induced expression of 21 cell wall genes. Second, inactivation of RlmA could have provoked a compensatory response in A. niger which confers a strong cross protection against cell wall stressors. In favor of the latter hypothesis are three observations: (i) Genes involved in cell wall remodeling, protein secretion and actin polarization were up-regulated in the deletion strain (Figure 5A and Additional file 7). (ii) The ΔrlmA strain did not show any hypersensitivity against CA, FP, AFP, FK506 and AbaA (Figure 4). (iii) Cultivation of the deletion strain in bioreactor settings and treatment with 50 ng/ ml CA did not provoke any significant transcriptomic response (data not shown), whereas it did for the wild-type strain (see above). It might be conceivable, however, that higher concentrations of CA would provoke a transcriptomic response in the ΔrlmA strain.

Promoter analysis of differentially expressed genes. In order to identify transcription factors, which in addition to RlmA mediate the survival response of A. niger to the cell surface stressors CA, FP, AbaA and FK506, we screened the 1,000-bp upstream regions of all differentially expressed genes for the presence of binding sites established for 25 transcription factors from different Aspergillus and Trichoderma species [48] and determined whether these motifs were significantly over- or underrepresented (500,000 bootstrap samples, FDR < 0.05). Binding sites for the transcription factors RlmA and MsnA were significantly enriched in the CA-responsive gene set of the wild-type strain, implying that MsnA could play in addition to RlmA an important role for the resistance of A. niger against cell wall stress while no binding sites were significantly enriched for either AbaA or FK506 treatment.

Phenotypic analyses of MsnA and RlmA deletion strains. MsnA has been shown to be positively involved in oxidative stress response, osmotic stress-coupled maintenance of polar growth and secondary metabolism in different Aspergilli [49]-[51]. In S. cerevisiae, the orthologs Msn2/4p are involved in several stress responses, including heat shock, osmotic shock, oxidative stress and pH resistance [52]. However, Msn2/4p are dispensable for the stress response in the yeast Candida albicans [53]. To unravel the function of MsnA for cell wall stress survival of A. niger, a msnA disruption strain and a ΔrlmA, msnA double mutant strain were generated and their phenotypes on solid media compared with the wild-type strain and the ΔrlmA deletion strain. Interestingly, all three mutant strains were not hypersensitive towards high osmolarity (2% glycerol), high temperature (42°C), high pH (pH 9.0), oxidative stress (4 mM H2O2), the presence of AFP (0.2 μg/ml), FP (1 μg/ml) or FK506 (10 μM; data not shown). However, different sensitivities were observed when the strains were treated with CFW, CA, AbaA, SDS or subjected to NaCl-mediated salt stress (Figure 6). A mildly increased tolerance of the single and double rlmA deletion strains were observed towards 1 M NaCl, suggesting that increased expression and secretion of cell wall genes and actin cytoskeleton might confer a tolerance towards high salt stress. In S. cerevisiae, it was shown that cell wall remodeling is indeed part of its physiological response to withstand salt stress [54],[55]. In return, the msnA knockout strain displayed a substantial higher tolerance towards the surface-active anionic detergent SDS when compared to the wild-type. This tolerance was interestingly not observed in the ΔrlmA strain and was abolished in the double mutant strain (Figure 6), suggesting that the RlmA-mediated response towards SDS-induced membrane stress is epistatic over the MsnA-dependent response or that remodeling of the cell wall in the ΔrlmA strain may prevents any MsnA-mediated response. It is not completely surprising that loss of MsnA can confer higher tolerance to some compounds. For example, deletion of Msn2p also caused reduced sensitivity towards some cell wall stressing agents [56]. As SDS induces the pleiotropic drug-resistance network in S. cerevisiae, thought to pump SDS and other small molecules out of yeast cells [57], it might be conceivable that loss of MsnA function in A. niger somehow also contributed to better extrusion of SDS out of the cells.
Figure 6

Plate sensitivity assays of rlmA and msnA null mutants towards different stress conditions. 5 μl of a series of a tenfold dilution started with 107 conidia per ml were spotted on MM plates supplemented with the indicated amounts of NaCl, SDS, caspofungin (CA), calcofluor white (CFW) and aureobasidin A (AbaA), respectively and incubated at 30°C for 3 days.

All three mutant strains became more sensitive towards CA, AbaA and CFW when cultivated on solid media (Figure 6), demonstrating that MsnA has - beside RlmA - a function in cell wall protection for A. niger. Whereas the contribution of both transcription factors was only very subtle with respect to 0.5 μg/ml CA and 2 μg/ml AbaA (note the ΔrlmA strain is insensitive to CA and AbaA when cultivated in liquid medium), both protect A. niger substantially against the chitin inhibitor CFW (40 μg/ml). Clearly, RlmA is the main contributor in the latter case because its inactivation resulted in a stronger growth-inhibited phenotype than inactivation of MsnA did. However, both seem to function in an additive or even synergistic manner, as the double mutant strains displayed a lethal phenotype on CFW plates. Notably, such an additive or synergistic phenotype was not observed on CA or AbaA plates, suggesting that both RlmA and MsnA function in the same signaling pathway when β-1,3-glucan polymerization or sphingolipid biosynthesis became inhibited.

Phenotypic analyses of a crzA deletion strain. The data above clearly showed that RlmA and MsnA are not the only transcription factors which protect A. niger against CA-induced cell wall stress. We thus rescreened the upstream regions of the CA-responsive gene set for the presence of enriched potential transcription factor binding sites. Indeed, when we lowered the length of the analyzed regions down to 500 bp instead of 1000 bp, CrzA binding sites appeared to be significantly enriched (63 genes out of 199 genes contain at least one CrzA binding site, FDR < 0.029; data not shown). To test whether CrzA might secure cell wall robustness as well, we analyzed the phenotype of a crzA null strain of A. niger (Ram et al., unpublished data) in the presence of CA, AbaA, FK506, CaCl2 and pH 8. Notably, the crzA deletion strain did not became hypersensitive towards FK506 and alkaline pH, which is in sharp contrast to the FK506- and pH 8 sensitive phenotype of the A. nidulans CrzA homologs [58]. In addition, the deletion strain was not hypersensitive towards CA and AbaA, respectively (Figure 7 and data not shown). However, CrzA is important for A. niger to withstand calcium-induced stress as well as the combined inhibitory effects of CA and AbaA (Figure 7). These observations corroborate the in silico data and demonstrate that CrzA has a minor but measurable function for A. niger to counteract cell wall stress.
Figure 7

Plate sensitivity assays of crzA , rlmA and msnA null mutants towards different stress conditions. 5 μl of a series of a tenfold dilution started with 107 conidia per ml were spotted on MM plates supplemented with the indicated amounts of CaCl2, caspofungin (CA), aureobasidin A (AbaA), FK506 and 100 mM MES to adjust pH 8, respectively and incubated at 30°C for 3 days.

Identification of upstream regulators ensuring cell wall integrity of A. niger. We have recently characterized the function of all six Rho-GTPases in A. niger and demonstrated that deletion of RhoB and RhoD rendered A. niger hypersensitive towards CFW [13]. This sensitivity is likely linked to their function - RhoB is mainly important for fast germination and sporulation, RhoD controls septum formation and fast hyphal growth rate. In the present study, the transcriptomic fingerprint of A. niger uncovered that the rhoB gene is among the CA-responsive genes and rhoD among the AbaA-responsive ones (Figures 1B and 3A). We thus performed additional growth-plate inhibition assays with the antifungal compounds used in this study (CA, AbaA, FP, FK506, SDS) to determine the tolerance of strains deleted for rhoB and rhoD, respectively. Strains deleted for the Rho-GTPase genes rhoC and cftA, which do not have a function in cell wall integrity [13], served as control strains in addition to the wild-type strain. No altered sensitivity of the mutant strains was observed when they became exposed to FP (1 μg/ml), FK506 (10 μM) and SDS (0.01%; data not shown); however, both ΔrhoB and ΔrhoD displayed increased sensitivity towards 0.5-1 μg/ml CA and 2 μg/ml AbaA (Figure 8 and data not shown). Notably, deletion of rhoB or rhoD rendered the strains even more sensitive towards CA than strains deleted for msnA or rlmA, implying that RhoB and RhoD target additional cell wall stress defense pathways in addition to the CWI pathway (eventually activating RlmA) and the pathway involving MsnA.
Figure 8

RhoB and RhoD are important for the response of A. niger towards caspofungin and aureobasidin A. (A) Sensitivity of the wild-type (wt) and rhoB, rhoC, rho or cftA deletion strain and (B) N402 (wt), JH1.1 (msnA), MF3.2 (ΔrlmA) and MF4.10 (ΔrlmA, msnA) towards caspofungin and aureobasidin A. 5 μl of a series of a tenfold dilution started with 107 conidia per ml were spotted on MM plates supplemented with the indicated amounts of caspofungin (CA) and aureobasidin A (AbaA) and incubated at 37°C for 3 days.

Discussion

Reinforcement of the cell wall is an essential survival response to shield cells after exposure to distinct cell surface stressors. Fungi have therefore developed various signaling pathways which sense and transmit the stress signal to the cell interior and the nucleus which in turn modulates gene expression such that the cell responds most appropriately to the life threatening condition. The well-studied unicellular yeast S. cerevisiae has been used as the main model system to study the underlying mechanisms. It has evolved at least three signaling pathways - the CWI pathway with its central components Pkcp, Slt2p and Rlm1p, the general response pathway with its mediators cAMP, PKA and Msn2/4 and the calcium/calcineurin pathway with its main effectors calcineurin and Crz1p – to reinforce its cell wall by increasing chitin, glucan and cell wall protein levels. These pathways are interwoven to maintain cell wall integrity during growth-mediated cell wall expansion and to flexible react to osmotic and mechanic stress conditions [8].

The main modules of cell wall salvage pathways are genetically fixed in yeast and filamentous fungi such as Aspergilli. However, accumulating evidences suggest that the individual modules differ in their cellular assignment, although the architectural hierarchy and direction of signal transmission is similar. To name just a few examples: The MsnA transcription factor is crucial for the stress response in S. cerevisiae but C. albicans [53], sensors of the CWI pathway process differently stress signals in A. fumigatus, A. nidulans, S. cerevisiae and Klyuveromyces lactis [11],[59], the transcription factor CrzA does not act as activator of VCX1 expression in S. cerevisiae but of vcxA expression in A. nidulans [34], the Rho GTPases RacA and CdcA/Cdc42 differ fundamentally in their function in A. niger and A. nidulans [13] and the exocyst-mediated vesicle transport of S. cerevisiae and A. niger is only partially conserved [26]. Hence, signal perception, transmission and translation can obviously differ among fungi which in fact could form a mechanistic explanation why fungi differ in their susceptibilities towards antifungal drugs. We have recently shown that the survival response of yeast and filamentous fungi towards the chitin synthase inhibitor AFP differs considerably. Whereas the presence of AFP provokes increased glucan synthesis via induction of the CWI pathway in AFP-sensitive fungi, AFP-resistant strains respond to AFP with enforced chitin synthesis by employing the calcium/calcineurin pathway [9]. Hence, the outcome of an antifungal attack strongly depends on the species-specific survival strategy chosen, which causatively might be linked to the different use of signaling pathways and their modules.

We are just at the beginning to understand cell wall stress survival strategies and the cross-talks between different signaling pathways specifically employed by A. niger, one of the main microbial production platforms in biotechnology. As cell wall integrity, vesicle transport, protein secretion and polarised growth are key factors contributing to the vitality and productivity of this cell factory, our efforts aim to decode the genetic basis of these processes and to understand how they are interlocked in order to pioneer rational strain improvement programs. The aim of the present study was thus to identify the transcriptomic signatures and physiological responses of A. niger when stressed with five different cell surface acting antifungals - CFW, CA, AbaA, FP and FK506. We used these signatures to predict regulator proteins mediating these responses and analysed the phenotypes of respective null mutant strains. This integrated approach allowed us to reconstruct a model for cell signaling pathways ensuring the survival of A. niger upon cell surface stress. The model is illustrated in Figure 9 and summarizes the following main conclusions: (i) Both inhibition of glucan synthesis via CA and inhibition of sphingolipid synthesis via AbaA induce the CWI pathway as a main compensatory response. The effector genes of this signaling route include chitin, glucan and (sphingo) lipid synthesizing genes. Key regulators of this response involve at least RhoB, RhoD, the protein kinase kinase MkkA and the transcription factor RlmA (Figures 1, 3A and 10 and Additional file 5). Such induced CWI pathway by CA and AbaA in A. niger is very well in agreement with observations made for S. cerevisiae [26], suggesting that cell wall integrity is not only strongly dependent on proper arrangement of cell wall polymers but also on sphingolipid homeostasis known to be important for cell membrane integrity and localization of cell wall proteins in S. cerevisiae [60]. Interestingly, the Venn diagram displaying overlapping CA and AbaA response genes (Figure 10A) predicts that even more genes are co-regulated by both drugs, suggesting that CA and AbaA stress signals are processed at least partially in similar signaling routes. (ii) Inhibition of ergosterol synthesis by FP does, however, not interfere with cell wall integrity (Figure 3B and Additional file 6) and only a few genes co-respond to both CA and FP treatment (Figure 10B). This suggests that ergosterol homeostasis is of somewhat minor importance for cell wall integrity and/or can be easier counteracted by post-transcriptional processes in A. niger. (iii) The activity of the transcription factor RlmA is crucially important for A. niger to survive treatments with the chitin inhibitor CFW. To a certain extent, RlmA also counteracts CA- and AbaA-induced stress (Figures 4, 8 and 9). The latter conclusion is corroborated by the fact that the ΔrlmA strain is unable to transcriptionally respond to treatments with CA, at least at concentrations which provoke cell wall stress in the wild-type situation (data not shown). Interestingly, lack of RlmA provokes a transcriptomic signature of A. niger, which is more than 50% identical to the wild-type’s signature when stressed with CA (Figure 5A, B and Additional file 7). This suggests that A. niger remodels its cell wall by the activity of additional transcription factor(s). (iv) Our in silico analyses of overrepresented transcription factor binding sites in the CA-responsive gene set disclosed MsnA and CrzA as potential candidate regulators. Indeed, single inactivation of the msnA and crzA genes rendered A. niger moderately sensitive to CA and AbaA. It thus becomes clear that the contribution of MsnA and CrzA to cell wall strengthening is only of limited importance (Figure 6). (v) RlmA, MsnA and CrzA do not function in the protection of A. niger against the calcium signaling inhibitor FK506, as the respective single or double deletion strains do not show altered susceptibilities against this calcineurin inhibitor. (vi) Similarly, the function of RlmA and MsnA is not important to counteract the growth inhibitory effects of FP; rather, the transcriptomic fingerprint proposes that the transcription factor SrbA is a likely regulator for this survival response.
Figure 9

Key players of the cell wall salvage gene network of A. niger deduced from transcriptomic and phenotypic analyses. For details, see results and discussion.

Figure 10

Venn diagrams of genes induced by antifungals treatment. Venn diagrams of absolute number of genes induced (black), repressed (grey) and up- or downregulated (italics) after treatment with aureobasidin A (AbaA), caspofungin (CA), fenpropimorph (FP) and FK506, respectively.

Conclusions

The present work uncovered different defence strategies of A. niger to protect itself against cell wall stress conditions. At least three transcription factors - RlmA, MsnA and CrzA – are employed in an obvious sophisticated and well-balanced manner. The data also predicts a fourth factor, SrbA, which seems to be specifically important during cell membrane stress. Future studies will disclose how these regulators are interlocked in different signaling pathways to secure survival under different stress conditions.

Methods

Strains, growth conditions and antifungal compounds

A. niger strains used in this study are listed in Table 3. The strains were grown at 30°C (unless otherwise stated) in minimal medium (MM) [61] or complete medium (CM), consisting of minimal medium (MM) supplemented with 1% yeast extract and 0.5% casamino acids. Fermentation medium (FM) was composed of 0.75% glucose, 0.45% NH4Cl, 0.15% KH2PO4, 0.05% KCl, 0.05% MgSO4, 0.1% salt solution [61] and 0.003% yeast extract. The pH of FM was adjusted to pH 3. Aureobasidin A was purchased from Takara Bio, FK506 from A.G. Scientific, fenpropimorph from Sigma Aldrich, caspofungin (Cancidas®) from Merck and calcofluor white from BASF.
Table 3

Aspergillus niger strains used in this work

Name

Genotype

Reference

N402

cspA1, amdS

[62]

MA169.4

kusA::DR-amdS- DR, pyrG

[63]

MA78.6

ΔkusA, pyrG + (derivative of MA70.15 containing A. niger pyrG)

[63]

MA47.1

ΔkusA, pyrG + , ΔrlmA ( derivative of AB4.1)

[12]

ER2.5

ΔkusA, ΔrhoB::AopyrG

[13]

ER3.4

ΔkusA, ΔrhoC::AopyrG

[13]

ER7.6

ΔkusA, ΔrhoD::AopyrG

[13]

MA84.1

ΔkusA, ΔcftA::hygR

[13]

MA234.1

pyrG + (derivative of N402 containing A. niger pyrG)

Unpublished

8.21

ΔcrzA, pyrG + (derivative of MA234.1)

Unpublished

MF3.2

kusA::DR-amdS- DR, ΔrlmA, hph

This study

JH1.1

kusA::DR-amdS-DR, msnA , hph

This study

MF4.10

kusA::DR-amdS- DR, msnA , ΔrlmA, hph

This study

Screening for antifungal-induced morphological changes

5 × 105 conidia of an A. niger strain were inoculated in Petri dishes containing 5 ml of liquid MM supplemented with 0.003% yeast extract. Prior to inoculation, coverslips were placed onto the bottom of the Petri dishes. Spores were allowed to germinate for 5 h at 37°C until small germ tubes became visible in more than 90% of the spores. Compounds were added at various concentrations. The negative control was supplemented with the same volume of solvent (ethanol or DMSO). After further cultivation for 1 h at 37°C, germlings that were adherent to the coverslips were analyzed by microscopy (see below). From at least 100 germlings per sample, the morphology was characterized as being either unbranched (germlings with a single germ tube) or branched (germlings with apical and/or subapical branches). The Branching Index was defined as BI = (Σ branched germlings) × (Σ branched + unbranched germlings)−1.

Growth assays in microtiter plates

104 conidia of an A. niger strain were inoculated in each well of 96-well optical glass bottom microtiter plates (Nunc art) in 200 μl MM supplemented with 0.003% yeast extract and cultivated for 30 hours at 30°C. Different concentrations of antifungals were supplemented prior to inoculation, whereby the negative controls were supplemented with the same volume of solvent (H2O, ethanol or DMSO). The effect of each compound was tested for at least 3 different concentrations in triplicates and each experiment was performed at least twice. Biomass accumulation was measured at fixed intervals at OD590.

Growth-plate inhibition assays

Defined spore titers of A. niger strains were used to inoculate MM plates supplemented with different concentrations of stress agents and incubated for 1–3 days at 30, 37 and 42°C, respectively. All experiments were performed at least in duplicates.

Bioreactor cultivation

Freshly harvested conidia (5 × 108) from strain N402 were used to inoculate 0.5 liters of FM. Cultivations were performed in BioFlo/CelliGen 115 bioreactors (New Brunswick Scientific) as described earlier [14]. In brief, 250 rpm was used as agitation speed and aeration was performed via the headspace until the dissolved oxygen tension dropped to 40%. Thereafter, aeration was switched to sparger aeration. Temperature and pH were set to 30°C and pH 3, respectively, and controlled on-line using the program NBS Biocommand. After 5 h of cultivation, AbaA (dissolved in 5 ml ethanol) or FK506 (dissolved in 5 ml DMSO) was added. 5 ml of ethanol or 5 ml of DMSO were added in the control runs. After an additional hour of cultivation, 500 ml of the culture broth were quickly harvested via filtration, and mycelial samples were immediately frozen using liquid nitrogen. In addition, samples were taken for microscopic analysis (see below) and calculation of the BI value. Note that the ΔrlmA deletion strain was cultivated 6 h instead of 5 h, as described previously [14].

Microscopy

Pictures of A. niger germlings were captured using an Axioplan 2 (Zeiss) equipped with a DKC-5000 digital camera (Sony). Light (using DIC settings) images were obtained with a 40× objective. Images were processed using Adobe Photoshop 6.0 (Adobe Systems Inc.).

RNA extraction, expression profiling

Total RNA isolation, RNA quality control, labeling, Affymetrix chip hybridization, scanning and signal calculation were performed as described previously [14]. Microarray analyses were performed for biological duplicates for each condition (controls, FK506-, and AbaA-treated samples). Expression data was analyzed using the open source programs R (http://www.r-project.org/) and Bioconductor (http://www.bioconductor.org/). Background correction, normalization and probe summarization was performed using the default setting of the robust multi-array analysis (RMA) package as recently described [64]. Differential gene expression was evaluated by moderated t-statistics using the Limma package [65] with a threshold of the Benjamini and Hochberg False Discovery Rate (FDR) of 0.05 [66]. Fold change of gene expression from different samples was calculated from normalized expression values. Geometric means of the expression values as well as fold change for all conditions and comparisons are summarized in Additional file 1 and Additional file 2 and have been deposited at the GEO repository (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) under the accession number GSE56471.

Bioinformatics

Responsive genes in the antifungal-treated samples were functionally classified into FunCat categories as described previously [14],[19]. In silico analysis of putative transcription factor binding sites localized in the 1,000-bp upstream regions the responsive genes was performed using the transcription factor binding site finder (TFBSF) tool [48]. In brief, the upstream regions of the differentially expressed genes were searched for the presence of putative binding sites recognized by 25 known transcription factors from Aspergillus or Trichoderma species (see Additional file 9). To determine significant over- or underrepresentation of binding sites, the background distribution of the identified motifs in the genome of A. niger was determined via bootstrapping (500,000 bootstraps).

Inactivation of rlmA and msnA genes in A. niger

To inactivate the rlmA gene, a deletion approach was followed as described previously [12]. Construct pΔRlmA [12] was used to delete the rlmA gene of A. niger in the ΔkusA background strain MA169.4 [63]. The plasmid was linearized with BglI prior to transformation. Transformants were purified twice on MM plates lacking uridine to obtain homokaryotic mycelium (pyrG+). Successful deletion was verified via Southern analysis (Additional file 10). Strain MF3.2 was selected for further analyses.

To inactivate the msnA gene, a disruption approach was followed. A 659 bp long fragment of the msnA gene comprising part of its 5’ open reading frame was amplified using the primers MsnA_fw_hind and MsnA_rev_hind (Additional file 11) and cloned into the unique restriction site HindIII of pAN7.1 [67]. Using the hph gene for hygromycin B resistance as a selective marker, the resulting vector pJH1.56 was co-transformed together with pAB4.1 [68] into MA169.4. This co-transformation approach was necessary to change the pyrG genetic background of MA169.4 into pyrG+. Transformants were purified twice on MM plates containing 100 μg/ ml hygromycin B and lacking uridine to obtain homokaryotic mycelium (hygB, pyrG+). Correct disruption of the msnA disruption cassette was verified via Southern analysis (Additional file 10). Strain JH1.1 was selected for further analyses.

To obtain a strain in which both rlmA and msnA genes were inactivated, strain MF3.2 (ΔrlmA) was transformed with the msnA disruption construct pJH1.56. Transformants were purified twice on MM containing 100 μg/ ml hygromycin B. Correct disruption of the msnA disruption cassette was verified via Southern analysis (Additional file 10). Strain MF4.10 was selected for further analyses.

Availability of supporting data

The data sets supporting the results of this article are available in the GEO repository, (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) under the accession number GSE56471.

Additional files

Declarations

Acknowledgments

This project was partly funded by the Marie Curie Integration grant to VM (CIG 303684) and supported by the Kluyver Centre for Genomics of Industrial Fermentation which is part of the Netherlands Genomics Initiative/Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research. We are grateful to Johannes Heindorf and Janine Gündel for their excellent technical assistance.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute of Biotechnology, Department Applied and Molecular Microbiology Berlin University of Technology
(2)
Institute of Biology Leiden, Leiden University, Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology
(3)
HiTeXacoat
(4)
Kluyver Centre for Genomics of Industrial Fermentation

References

  1. Normile D: Spoiling for a fight with mold. Science 2010, 327: 807. 10.1126/science.327.5967.807PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown GD, Denning DW, Levitz SM: Tackling human fungal infections. Science 2012, 336: 647. 10.1126/science.1222236PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Free SJ: Fungal cell wall organization and biosynthesis. Adv Genet 2013, 81: 33–82. 10.1016/B978-0-12-407677-8.00002-6PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Tefsen B, Lagendijk EL, Park J, Akeroyd M, Schachtschabel D, Winkler R, van Die I, Ram AFJ: Fungal α-arabinofuranosidases of glycosyl hydrolase families 51 and 54 show a dual arabinofuranosyl- and galactofuranosyl-hydrolyzing activity. Biol Chem 2012, 393: 767–75. 10.1515/hsz-2012-0134PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Klis FM, Boorsma A, De Groot PWJ: Cell wall construction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Yeast 2006, 23: 185–202. 10.1002/yea.1349PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Lesage G, Bussey H: Cell wall assembly in Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2006, 70: 317–43. 10.1128/MMBR.00038-05PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Thevelein JM, de Winde JH: Novel sensing mechanisms and targets for the cAMP-protein kinase A pathway in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Mol Microbiol 1999, 33: 904–18. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01538.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Levin DE: Regulation of cell wall biogenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae : the cell wall integrity signaling pathway. Genetics 2011, 189: 1145–75. 10.1534/genetics.111.128264PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Ouedraogo JP, Hagen S, Spielvogel A, Engelhardt S, Meyer V: Survival strategies of yeast and filamentous fungi against the antifungal protein AFP. J Biol Chem 2011, 286: 13859–68. 10.1074/jbc.M110.203588PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. May GS, Xue T, Kontoyiannis DP, Gustin MC: Mitogen activated protein kinases of Aspergillus fumigatus . Med Mycol 2005,43(Suppl 1):S83–6. 10.1080/13693780400024784PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Dichtl K, Helmschrott C, Dirr F, Wagener J: Deciphering cell wall integrity signalling in Aspergillus fumigatus : identification and functional characterization of cell wall stress sensors and relevant Rho GTPases. Mol Microbiol 2012, 83: 506–19. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07946.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Damveld RA, Arentshorst M, Franken A, van Kuyk PA, Klis FM, van den Hondel CA, Ram AFJ: The Aspergillus niger MADS-box transcription factor RlmA is required for cell wall reinforcement in response to cell wall stress. Mol Microbiol 2005, 58: 305–19. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04827.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Kwon MJ, Arentshorst M, Roos ED, van den Hondel CA, Meyer V, Ram AFJ: Functional characterization of Rho GTPases in Aspergillus niger uncovers conserved and diverged roles of Rho proteins within filamentous fungi. Mol Microbiol 2011, 79: 1151–67. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07524.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Meyer V, Damveld RA, Arentshorst M, Stahl U, van den Hondel CA, Ram AFJ: Survival in the presence of antifungals: genome-wide expression profiling of Aspergillus niger in response to sublethal concentrations of caspofungin and fenpropimorph. J Biol Chem 2007, 282: 32935–48. 10.1074/jbc.M705856200PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Hagen S, Marx F, Ram AF, Meyer V: The antifungal protein AFP from Aspergillus giganteus inhibits chitin synthesis in sensitive fungi. Appl Environ Microbiol 2007, 73: 2128–34. 10.1128/AEM.02497-06PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Jesch SA, Gaspar ML, Stefan CJ, Aregullin MA, Henry SA: Interruption of inositol sphingolipid synthesis triggers Stt4p-dependent protein kinase C signaling. J Biol Chem 2010, 285: 41947–60. 10.1074/jbc.M110.188607PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Van den Berg RA, Braaksma M, van der Veen D, van der Werf MJ, Punt PJ, van der Oost J, de Graaff LH: Identification of modules in Aspergillus niger by gene co-expression network analysis. Fungal Genet Biol 2010, 47: 539–50. 10.1016/j.fgb.2010.03.005PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Van den Berg RA, Hoefsloot HCJ, Westerhuis JA, Smilde AK, van der Werf MJ: Centering, scaling, and transformations: improving the biological information content of metabolomics data. BMC Genomics 2006, 7: 142. 10.1186/1471-2164-7-142PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Ruepp A, Zollner A, Maier D, Albermann K, Hani J, Mokrejs M, Tetko I, Güldener U, Mannhaupt G, Münsterkötter M, Mewes HW: The FunCat, a functional annotation scheme for systematic classification of proteins from whole genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 2004, 32: 5539–45. 10.1093/nar/gkh894PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Pel HJ, de Winde JH, Archer DB, Dyer PS, Hofmann G, Schaap PJ, Turner G, de Vries RP, Albang R, Albermann K, Andersen MR, Bendtsen JD, Benen JAE, van den Berg M, Breestraat S, Caddick MX, Contreras R, Cornell M, Coutinho PM, Danchin EGJ, Debets AJM, Dekker P, van Dijck PWM, van Dijk A, Dijkhuizen L, Driessen AJM, D’Enfert C, Geysens S, Goosen C, Groot GSP: Genome sequencing and analysis of the versatile cell factory Aspergillus niger CBS 513.88. Nat Biotechnol 2007, 25: 221–31. 10.1038/nbt1282PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Aeed PA, Young CL, Nagiec MM, Elhammer AP: Inhibition of inositol phosphorylceramide synthase by the cyclic peptide aureobasidin A. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009, 53: 496–504. 10.1128/AAC.00633-08PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Dickson RC: Roles for sphingolipids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Adv Exp Med Biol 2010, 688: 217–31. 10.1007/978-1-4419-6741-1_15PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Endo M, Takesako K, Kato I, Yamaguchi H: Fungicidal action of aureobasidin A, a cyclic depsipeptide antifungal antibiotic, against Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1997, 41: 672–6.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Roelants FM, Breslow DK, Muir A, Weissman JS, Thorner J: Protein kinase Ypk1 phosphorylates regulatory proteins Orm1 and Orm2 to control sphingolipid homeostasis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011, 108: 19222–7. 10.1073/pnas.1116948108PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Berchtold D, Piccolis M, Chiaruttini N, Riezman I, Riezman H, Roux A, Walther TC, Loewith R: Plasma membrane stress induces relocalization of Slm proteins and activation of TORC2 to promote sphingolipid synthesis. Nat Cell Biol 2012, 14: 542–7. 10.1038/ncb2480PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Lee S, Gaspar ML, Aregullin MA, Jesch SA, Henry SA: Activation of protein kinase C-mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling in response to inositol starvation triggers Sir2p-dependent telomeric silencing in yeast. J Biol Chem 2013, 288: 27861–71. 10.1074/jbc.M113.493072PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Rhome R, Del Poeta M: Lipid signaling in pathogenic fungi. Annu Rev Microbiol 2009, 63: 119–31. 10.1146/annurev.micro.091208.073431PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Punt PJ, Seiboth B, Weenink XO, van Zeijl C, Lenders M, Konetschny C, Ram AF, Montijn R, Kubicek CP, van den Hondel CA: Identification and characterization of a family of secretion-related small GTPase-encoding genes from the filamentous fungus Aspergillus niger : a putative SEC4 homologue is not essential for growth. Mol Microbiol 2001, 41: 513–25. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02541.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Kihara A, Igarashi Y: Identification and characterization of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene, RSB1, involved in sphingoid long-chain base release. J Biol Chem 2002, 277: 30048–54. 10.1074/jbc.M203385200PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Jenkins GM, Hannun YA: Role for de novo sphingoid base biosynthesis in the heat-induced transient cell cycle arrest of Saccharomyces cerevisiae . J Biol Chem 2001, 276: 8574–81. 10.1074/jbc.M007425200PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Chung N, Jenkins G, Hannun YA, Heitman J, Obeid LM: Sphingolipids signal heat stress-induced ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis. J Biol Chem 2000, 275: 17229–32. 10.1074/jbc.C000229200PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Cyert MS: Calcineurin signaling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae : how yeast go crazy in response to stress. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2003, 311: 1143–50. 10.1016/S0006-291X(03)01552-3PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Cunningham KW, Fink GR: Calcineurin inhibits VCX1-dependent H+/Ca2+ exchange and induces Ca2+ ATPases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Mol Cell Biol 1996, 16: 2226–37.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Spielvogel A, Findon H, Arst HN, Araújo-Bazán L, Hernández-Ortíz P, Stahl U, Meyer V, Espeso EA: Two zinc finger transcription factors, CrzA and SltA , are involved in cation homoeostasis and detoxification in Aspergillus nidulans . Biochem J 2008, 414: 419–29. 10.1042/BJ20080344PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Hay JC: Calcium: a fundamental regulator of intracellular membrane fusion? EMBO Rep 2007, 8: 236–40. 10.1038/sj.embor.7400921PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Guillemette T, van Peij NNME, Goosen T, Lanthaler K, Robson GD, van den Hondel CA, Stam H, Archer DB: Genomic analysis of the secretion stress response in the enzyme-producing cell factory Aspergillus niger . BMC Genomics 2007, 8: 158. 10.1186/1471-2164-8-158PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Yang M, Zhong WW, Srivastava N, Slavin A, Yang J, Hoey T, An S: G protein-coupled lysophosphatidic acid receptors stimulate proliferation of colon cancer cells through the β-catenin pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005, 102: 6027–32. 10.1073/pnas.0501535102PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Gehrke A, Heinekamp T, Jacobsen ID, Brakhage AA: Heptahelical receptors GprC and GprD of Aspergillus fumigatus are essential regulators of colony growth, hyphal morphogenesis, and virulence. Appl Environ Microbiol 2010, 76: 3989–98. 10.1128/AEM.00052-10PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. De Souza WR, Morais ER, Krohn NG, Savoldi M, Goldman MHS, Rodrigues F, Caldana C, Semelka CT, Tikunov AP, Macdonald JM, Goldman GH: Identification of metabolic pathways influenced by the G-protein coupled receptors GprB and GprD in Aspergillus nidulans . PLoS One 2013, 8: e62088. 10.1371/journal.pone.0062088PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Magee T, Seabra MC: Fatty acylation and prenylation of proteins: what’s hot in fat. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2005, 17: 190–6. 10.1016/j.ceb.2005.02.003PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Kale TA, Hsieh SJ, Rose MW, Distefano MD: Use of synthetic isoprenoid analogues for understanding protein prenyltransferase mechanism and structure. Curr Top Med Chem 2003, 3: 32. 10.2174/1568026033452087View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Rossi G, Yu JA, Newman AP, Ferro-Novick S: Dependence of Ypt1 and Sec4 membrane attachment on Bet2. Nature 1991, 351: 158–61. 10.1038/351158a0PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Marcireau C, Guilloton M, Karst F: In vivo effects of fenpropimorph on the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and determination of the molecular basis of the antifungal property. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1990, 34: 989–93. 10.1128/AAC.34.6.989PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Blatzer M, Barker BM, Willger SD, Beckmann N, Blosser SJ, Cornish EJ, Mazurie A, Grahl N, Haas H, Cramer RA: SREBP coordinates iron and ergosterol homeostasis to mediate triazole drug and hypoxia responses in the human fungal pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus . PLoS Genet 2011, 7: e1002374. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002374PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Delahodde A, Pandjaitan R, Corral-Debrinski M, Jacq C: Pse1/Kap121-dependent nuclear localization of the major yeast multidrug resistance (MDR) transcription factor Pdr1. Mol Microbiol 2001, 39: 304–313. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02182.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Isoyama T, Murayama A, Nomoto A, Kuge S: Nuclear import of the yeast AP-1-like transcription factor Yap1p is mediated by transport receptor Pse1p, and this import step is not affected by oxidative stress. J Biol Chem 2001, 276: 21863–9. 10.1074/jbc.M009258200PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Ueta R, Fukunaka A, Yamaguchi-Iwai Y: Pse1p mediates the nuclear import of the iron-responsive transcription factor Aft1p in Saccharomyces cerevisiae . J Biol Chem 2003, 278: 50120–7. 10.1074/jbc.M305046200PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Meyer V, Arentshorst M, Flitter SJ, Nitsche BM, Kwon MJ, Reynaga-Peña CG, Bartnicki-Garcia S, van den Hondel CA, Ram AFJ: Reconstruction of signaling networks regulating fungal morphogenesis by transcriptomics. Eukaryot Cell 2009, 8: 1677–91. 10.1128/EC.00050-09PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Han KH, Prade RA: Osmotic stress-coupled maintenance of polar growth in Aspergillus nidulans . Mol Microbiol 2002, 43: 1065–78. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02774.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Hong SY, Roze LV, Wee J, Linz JE: Evidence that a transcription factor regulatory network coordinates oxidative stress response and secondary metabolism in aspergilli . Microbiologyopen 2013, 2: 144–60. 10.1002/mbo3.63PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Kim JH, Chan KL, Faria NCG, De L MM, Campbell BC: Targeting the oxidative stress response system of fungi with redox-potent chemosensitizing agents. Front Microbiol 2012, 3: 88.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Bose S, Dutko JA, Zitomer RS: Genetic factors that regulate the attenuation of the general stress response of yeast. Genetics 2005, 169: 1215–26. 10.1534/genetics.104.034603PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Nicholls S, Straffon M, Enjalbert B, Nantel A, Macaskill S, Whiteway M, Brown AJP: Msn2- and Msn4-like transcription factors play no obvious roles in the stress responses of the fungal pathogen Candida albicans . Eukaryot Cell 2004, 3: 1111–23. 10.1128/EC.3.5.1111-1123.2004PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Szopinska A, Degand H, Hochstenbach J-F, Nader J, Morsomme P: Rapid response of the yeast plasma membrane proteome to salt stress. Mol Cell Proteomics 2011, 10: M111.009589. 10.1074/mcp.M111.009589PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Liu X, Zhang X, Wang C, Liu L, Lei M, Bao X: Genetic and comparative transcriptome analysis of bromodomain factor 1 in the salt stress response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Curr Microbiol 2007, 54: 325–30. 10.1007/s00284-006-0525-4PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. López-García B, Gandía M, Muñoz A, Carmona L, Marcos JF: A genomic approach highlights common and diverse effects and determinants of susceptibility on the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae exposed to distinct antimicrobial peptides. BMC Microbiol 2010, 10: 289. 10.1186/1471-2180-10-289PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Sirisattha S, Momose Y, Kitagawa E, Iwahashi H: Toxicity of anionic detergents determined by Saccharomyces cerevisiae microarray analysis. Water Res 2004, 38: 61–70. 10.1016/j.watres.2003.08.027PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Spielvogel A, Findon H, Arst HN, Araújo-Bazán L, Hernández-Ortíz P, Stahl U, Meyer V, Espeso EA: Two zinc finger transcription factors, CrzA and SltA , are involved in cation homoeostasis and detoxification in Aspergillus nidulans . Biochem J 2008, 414: 419–429. 10.1042/BJ20080344PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Futagami T, Goto M: Putative cell wall integrity sensor proteins in Aspergillus nidulans . Commun Integr Biol 2012, 5: 206–8. 10.4161/cib.18993PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Epstein S, Riezman H: Sphingolipid signaling in yeast: potential implications for understanding disease. Front Biosci (Elite Ed) 2013, 5: 97–108.Google Scholar
  61. Meyer V, Ram AFJ, Punt PJ: Genetics, genetic manipulation, and approaches to strain improvement of filamentous fungi. In Man Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. Volume 1 . 3rd edition. Wiley, NY; 2010:318–329.Google Scholar
  62. Bos CJ, Debets AJ, Swart K, Huybers A, Kobus G, Slakhorst SM: Genetic analysis and the construction of master strains for assignment of genes to six linkage groups in Aspergillus niger . Curr Genet 1988, 14: 437–43. 10.1007/BF00521266PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Carvalho NDSP, Arentshorst M, Kwon MJ, Meyer V, Ram AFJ: Expanding the ku70 toolbox for filamentous fungi: establishment of complementation vectors and recipient strains for advanced gene analyses. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2010, 87: 1463–1473. 10.1007/s00253-010-2588-1PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Nitsche BM, Ram AFJ, Meyer V: The use of open source bioinformatics tools to dissect transcriptomic data. Methods Mol Biol 2012, 835: 311–31. 10.1007/978-1-61779-501-5_19PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Smyth GK: Linear models and empirical bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 2004, 3: Article3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y: Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B 1995, 57: 289–300.Google Scholar
  67. Punt PJ, Oliver RP, Dingemanse MA, Pouweisa PH, van den Hondel CA: Transformation of Aspergillus based on the hygromycin B resistance marker from Escherichia coli . Gene 1987, 56: 117–124. 10.1016/0378-1119(87)90164-8PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Van Hartingsveldt W, Mattern IE, van Zeijl CM, Pouwels PH, van den Hondel CA: Development of a homologous transformation system for Aspergillus niger based on the pyrG gene. Mol Gen Genet 1987, 206: 71–5. 10.1007/BF00326538PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Fiedler et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.