Skip to main content

Variability in metabolites produced by Talaromyces pinophilus SPJ22 cultured on different substrates



Several metabolites released by fungal species are an essential source of biologically active natural substances. Gas chromatography high resolution time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC-HRTOF-MS) is one of the techniques used in profiling the metabolites produced by microorganisms, including Talaromyces pinophilus. However, there is limited information regarding differential substrates’ impacts on this fungal strain’s metabolite profiling. This study examined the metabolite profile of T. pinophilus strain SPJ22 cultured on three different media, including solid czapek yeast extract agar (CYA), malt extract agar (MEA) and potato dextrose agar (PDA) using GC-HRTOF-MS. The mycelia including the media were plugged and dissolved in 5 different organic solvents with varying polarities viz.: acetonitrile, dichloromethane, hexane, 80% methanol and water, and extracts analysed on GC-HRTOF-MS.


The study revealed the presence of different classes of metabolites, such as fatty acids (2.13%), amides (4.26%), alkanes (34.04%), furan (2.13%), ketones (4.26%), alcohols (14.89%), aromatic compounds (6.38%), and other miscellaneous compounds (17.02%). Significant metabolites such as acetic acid, 9-octadecenamide, undecanoic acid methyl ester, hydrazine, hexadecane, nonadecane, eicosane, and other compounds reported in this study have been widely documented to have plant growth promoting, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and biofuel properties. Furthermore, T. pinophilus grown on PDA and MEA produced more than twice as many compounds as that grown on CYA.


Thus, our result showed that the production of essential metabolites from T. pinophilus is substrate dependent, with many of these metabolites known to have beneficial characteristics, and as such, this organism can be utilised as a sustainable and natural source for these useful organic molecules.


Metabolites are the intermediates products of cellular metabolisms catalysed by different enzymes. The biosynthesis of metabolites by microorganisms has recently gained attention [1]. These metabolites, which include a wide range of antibiotics, antitumor agents, and several therapeutic compounds, are produced naturally in nature as byproducts of microorganisms’ primary or secondary metabolism. Fungi, like other microbes, produce an array of significant metabolites with biotechnological applications [1, 2]. Approximately 250 volatile metabolites from fungi have previously been discovered as intermediates or final products of several metabolic pathways [3]. However, this number has recently been updated to 479 [1]. It has been established that the metabolite profiling of certain fungal species or strain varies depending on the substrate, species, incubation time, and interactions between certain environmental factors [2, 4].

Talaromyces pinophilus, a fungus from the genus Talaromyces and the family Trichocomaceae is known for producing some essential bioactive metabolites, including terpenoids, alkaloids, polyketides, tetraene, esters, lactones, and furanosteroids [5,6,7]. This fungal species has been widely employed as effective cellulose and waste degrading agent [8, 9], a renewable source of natural colourants [10], and a stimulator of phytoremediation efficacy [11]. Furthermore, T. pinophilus exhibited plant development-promoting properties on Waito-C rice [12] and chickpea [13], as well as mycoparasitic activity against Botrytis cinerea [14] and Rhizoctonia solani [15]. Interestingly, 3-O-methylfunicone, a prominent metabolite of T. pinophilus strain F36CF has been shown to have insecticidal activity against aphids [7] and antiviral effect on Bovine Herpesvirus 1 infection [16], while 2-hydroxyradiclonic acid, a methanolic extract of T. pinophilus strain AF-02 obtained from a Chinese green onion, demonstrated potent antibacterial activity against Escherichia coli [17]. However, the metabolites produced by T. pinophilus are still poorly understood and have not been explored in depth due to lack of comprehensive genetic data [6] and effective metabolomic analytical approach.

Different analytical techniques generally employed in metabolites studies include solid-phase microextraction (SPME), high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) [18,19,20,21]. Thus, the selection of a particular approach is informed by certain factors, including sample matrix, sample quantity, the concentration, and properties of the metabolites [22]. GC-MS, the preferred technique for low polarity, volatile, and semi-volatile compounds [21], is one of the first techniques used in several disciplines for metabolite/metabolomics profiling [23]. Furthermore, GC coupled to high-resolution time-of-flight mass spectrometry (HRTOF-MS) is one of the recent innovations and robust metabolomic technologies, with improved mass resolutions and data collection rates [24, 25]. As shown in previous studies, GC-HRTOF-MS is a potent analytical technique that can effectively screen various metabolites in microorganisms with high sensitivity and excellent results [26,27,28].

Due to the involvement of T. pinophilus in various types of associations with plants and related pathogens and pests, coupled with their biological applications, particularly in crop protection and growth enhancement, the identification of bioactive metabolites with these important biological activities can aid in the development of novel biofungicides, biobactericides, biopesticides, biofertilisers, and biofuel, especially when they are primarily or only found in T. pinophilus [21]. This study aimed to examine the diversity in the essential metabolites produced by T. pinophilus from South African dairy feed in different media using GC-HRTOF-MS as well as classify the extracted compounds according to their chemical nature.


Identification of T. pinophilus strain SPJ22

T. pinophilus strain SPJ22 was identified using both morphological features and molecular approaches. Its conidia germinated on PDA, CYA, and MEA within 5 days at 27 oC. Colour variations were observed in the three media. To confirm the relationship between the Talaromyces spp. and T. pinophilus strain SPJ22, a phylogenetic tree based on the ITS gene sequence of SPJ22 (ON598611) and other species of Talaromyces was constructed (Fig. 1). SPJ22 clearly clustered with T. pinophilus strain KR9 with 77% identity.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Molecular phylogeny of T. pinophilus strain SPJ22 recovered from South African dairy cattle feeds and feedstuffs with DNA sequences for reference strains of T. pinophilus. Bootstrap values (as percentages) are shown at internal nodes

Identification of different metabolites produced by T. pinophilus strain SPJ22

The metabolites of T. pinophilus grown on three different substrates (PDA, CYA, and MEA) were analysed using GC-HRTOF-MS. According to our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the variability in the metabolites produced by T. pinophilus on different substrates. The metabolites analysis of the SPJ22 strain revealed the presence of 47 known metabolites (Table 1). The primary metabolites found in the PDA medium include 2-undecen-4-ol, ergosta-5,7,9 (11), 22-tetraen-3β-ol, 1-Iodo-2-methylundecane, 3,3-dimethylpentane, nanonamide, eicosanoic acid, tridecanoic acid methyl ester, 2-hydroxyethyl ester, dibuty phthalate and 2-propynenitrile, 3-fluoro. Hydrazine and Benzeneethanamine, 2-fluoro- beta., 3, 4-trihydroxy-N-isopropyl were the 2 compounds only found in CYA, while 2,2,3,3,5,6,6-heptamethylheptane, 9-octadecenamide, 3-methyl-1,4-diazabicyclo [4.3.0] nonan-2,5-dione,N-acetyl, hexahydropyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrazine-1,4-dione and 3,3-di (trifluoromethyl) diazirine were the primary metabolites found only in MEA (Table 1).

Table 1 Identified metabolites produced by T. phinophilus on PDA, MEA, and CYA.

PDA exhibited greater product diversity than CYA, with 31 substances distinct from those produced on CYA, and 12 in common with those of MEA, showing the organism’s broad capacity to produce different compounds on diverse substrates (Fig. 2A). Most compounds produced on CYA were also produced on either MEA or PDA. The identified metabolites in the different intersections of the substrate are shown in Additional file 1.

The compounds detected in this study were further grouped according to their chemical nature, including alkanes (34.04%), alcohols (14.89%), ketones (4.26%), esters (14.89%), aromatic compounds (6.38%), amides (4.26%), furan (2.13%), fatty acid (2.13%), and other miscellaneous compounds (17.02%) (Fig. 2B). Surprisingly, all 7 esters produced by the T. pinophilus strain SPJ22 were detected in PDA and MEA cultures, with 6 of these metabolites only found in PDA. Alkanes, the highest occurring group of compounds produced by T. pinophilus in this study, were only found in MEA and PDA cultures, while the only 2 ketones identified in this work were only observed in MEA culture.

Fig. 2
figure 2

A Venn diagram showing the number of metabolites produced by the T. pinophilus on the three cultivation media (CYA, PDA, and MEA), and B Pie chart showing percentage distribution of the metabolites produced by T. pinophilus


Several authors have reported the significant impact of substrate composition on the type and frequency of metabolites released by fungal isolates [29,30,31]. In this study, T. pinophilus grown on PDA and MEA produced more than twice as many compounds than T. pinophilus grown on CYA. This same trend was also observed in a previous work by Mallette et al. [32], which could be attributed to differences in substrates, which in turn could alter microbial activities. This is unsurprising given the disparities in initial substrate complexity. It has also been established that Penicillium aurantiogriseum produced the highest number of alcohol when inoculated on oat grain, and equally released more terpenes when grown on Norkrans and Czapek agars [33]. In another study conducted by Larsen and Frisvad [34] to characterise the secondary metabolites from 47 Penicillium taxa using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and GC-MS, the authors confirmed that metabolites profiling of the fungal species vary with the substrates as the Penicillium isolates grown on yeast extract sucrose (YES) agar produced the highest amount of metabolites, while the same isolates produced a much smaller amount of metabolites when cultured on malt extract agar (MEA), with the isolates inoculated on CYA producing the least amount of compounds.

Furthermore, a research performed to evaluate the impacts of substrate and fungal species on the production of secondary metabolites by two Trichoderma spp. i.e., T. viride (T60) and T. pseudokoningii showed that the metabolites released by the 2 Trichoderma spp. were dependent on both substrate type and the Trichoderma isolate [35]. This was in concordance with Mäki et al. [4] who investigated the influence of different wood substrates (pine wood and spruce wood substrates) on the production of essential metabolites by 3 wood-decaying fungal isolates, Phlebia radiata, Fomitopsis pinicola and Trichaptum abietinum. Their findings revealed that substrate quality might enhance the release of metabolites from fungal species as the concentration of the significant metabolites released on pine wood substrate were higher than on spruce wood substrate.

Some of the metabolites produced by T. pinophilus strain SPJ22 in this work had previously been attributed to Talaromyces by Zhai et al. [5] and they are widely documented to have plant growth promoting, antioxidant, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and biofuel properties [26, 36, 37]. For instance, it has been shown that acetic acid increases grapevine tolerance to NaHCO3 stress by raising salicylic acid, the endogenous growth regulator of phenolic nature [38]. Pentadecane and 1-iodo–2-methylundecane obtained via co-culturing of Trichoderma longibrachiatum with Macrophomina phaseolina, Rhizoctonia solani, and Magnaporthe grisea in rice clearly displayed mycoparasitic activity against R. solani, Pythium sp., M. grisea, Fusarium oxysporum, M. phaseolina, and Cyrtomium falcatum with a more significant effect demonstrated on R. solani [39]. Furthermore, undecanoic acid methyl ester, another important metabolite released by T. pinophilus SPJ22 has been found to possess antioxidant and antimicrobial properties [40, 41].

Hydrazine is a precursor to a variety of pharmaceuticals and pesticides. This substance has also been found to have antifungal effects against a number of fungal species. For instance, Dascalu et al. [42] investigated the antifungal properties of hydrazine compound and its derivatives against 12 fungal species viz. Penicillium ochrochloron, Cladosporium cladosporioides, Paecilomyces variotii, Alternaria alternata, Aspergillus oryzae, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, Botrytis cinerea, Fusarium solani, Candida tropicalis, Geotrichum candidum, Candida pseudotropicalis, and Candida krusei, with good antifungal activities, particularly against P. variotii and F. solani. Moreso, Zakaria et al. [43] showed that hexadecane has a strong inhibitory effect on Pseudomonas aeruginosa, demonstrating antioxidant and antibacterial properties. Eicosane has been confirmed to have activity on clinical and food borne pathogens [44, 45], whereas 9-octadecenamide was demonstrated to have antibacterial and anti‐inflammatory properties [37, 46].

Biofuel (ethanol and biodiesel) is a potential liquid fuel currently utilised as an alternative fuel for transportation [47]. Fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs), which make up biodiesel, are now derived from microbial sources such as fungi, bacteria, and algae. Mallette et al. [32] identified nonadecane as one of the most important biofuel compounds produced by Ascocoryne sarcoides (NRRL 50,072). Finally, it is important to mention that most of the alkanes released by T. pinophilus strain SPJ22 has been reported to be potential bio-renewable fuel/mycodiesel [48].

The production of beneficial biotechnological metabolites by the T. pinophilus isolate in this study can be linked to the putative biosynthetic gene cluster previously reported in some fungal isolates, including the genera Talaromyces [6, 49]. A comparative genomic analysis of T. pinophilus 1–95 revealed that the fungal strain contained 68 metabolism gene clusters containing 401 putative genes, including Type1 polyketide synthase genes and nonribosomal peptide synthase genes [6]. The authors found that T. pinophilus 1–95 contains more secondary metabolites than other related filamentous fungi, promoting the cultivation of T. pinophilus for the high synthesis of beneficial metabolites. In addition, Ahmed [49] complete genome sequence of T. stipitatus and the advancement in bioinformatics tools have facilitated the discovery of the fungus’s biosynthetic potential, with the identification of a putative biosynthetic gene cluster (BGC) of the polyesters encoding a highly reducing polyketide synthase (HR-PKS) and nonreducing polyketide synthase (NR-PKS). According to Le Govic et al. [50], these genes are responsible for forming several metabolites in bacterial and fungal species.


The main limitation of this study was the agar plug extraction method, as other compounds from the fungus and media could have been extracted along with the metabolites. Another limitation is the inability to identify the specific biosynthetic gene clusters involved in producing the essential metabolites in T. pinophilus SPJ22.


Several metabolites of T. pinophilus were identified in this study using three different substrates (i.e., PDA, CYA, and MEA). Accordingly, the type of metabolites and frequency of their production show conclusively that metabolites production by fungi, particularly T. pinophilus, are substrate dependent. The application and potential use of the important metabolites released by this fungal strain in the medical, industrial, and agricultural sectors is feasible. These substances can be employed in cost-effective biological processes to boost agricultural productivity, as some of these compounds have been widely documented to have biofertilizer, antimicrobial, mycotoxin biocontrol, and biofuel-producing properties. Further research into the separation, quantification and application of the metabolites found in this study is still needed, particularly for those important bioactive metabolites obtained in all three media. These findings contributed to a better understanding of metabolites produced by T. pinophilus SPJ22 (ON598611) in various substrates.

Materials and methods

Isolation and identification of T. pinophilus

The T. pinophilus SPJ22 strain used in this study was recovered from dairy cattle feeds in South Africa. The fungus strain was identified macroscopically and microscopically using the identification method of [51] and confirmed by molecular means. Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) was extracted from a 7-day-old T. pinophilus inoculated on PDA using the Fungal/Bacterial DNA extraction kit (Zymo Research Corporation, Southern California, USA) as directed by the manufacturer. Then, the isolated DNA was amplified at the ITS region using the primers ITS-1; 5’- TCC GTA GGT GAA CCT GCG G − 3’ (forward) and ITS-4; 5’- TCC TCC GCT TAT GC-3’ (reverse), designed by White et al. [52]. Each reaction contained 12.5 µL of Red taq ready mix (Sigma- Aldrich, Germany), 0.3 µL of each primer (ITS-1 and ITS-4), 0.8 µL of DNA sample, 0.5 µL of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), and 9.6 µL of ddH2O to bring the total volume to 24 µL. A negative control comprising all reagents besides the DNA was also prepared.

A ProFlex 32-well PCR System (ThermoFisher Scientific, Singapore) was used to perform the PCR reaction with initial DNA denaturation at 95 oC for 2 min, 35 cycles of denaturation at 95 oC for 30 s, an annealing step at 50 oC for 30 s and primer extension at 72 oC for 1 min. This was followed by a final elongation period of 10 min at 72 oC holding for 4 oC until samples were retrieved. After that, PCR products were purified with a DNA ZR-96 sequencing clean-up kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) to remove residual primers. Purified PCR products were sequenced in both directions (forward and reverse) at the African Centre for DNA Barcoding (ACDB), University of Johannesburg, South Africa, using an ABI 3130 x l Genetic Analyzer (ThermoFisher Scientific, Tokyo, Japan). The DNA sequence was analysed using BLAST ( to obtain the species name.

The 18 S rRNA gene sequences from the GenBank database were used as the baseline for phylogenetic analysis and multiple data alignments using ClustalW of the EMBL-EBI website ( Afterwards, a phylogenetic tree was constructed with the help of MEGA 7.0 [53] by measuring distances and clustering using the Maximum Likelihood strategy of [54]. The parameter chosen for the phylogenetic tree construction was Bootstrap values based on 1000 replications [55], and all branches with less than 50% site coverage were collapsed. Fusarium verticillioides and Fusarium subglutinans were selected as the out-group species. The phylogenetic tree constructed was utilised to evaluate the evolutionary relationship between the isolated T. talaromyces strain SPJ22 from this study and its Gen Bank relatives. Sequence was then deposited in a GenBank under the accession number ON598611.

Extraction of metabolites

Pure T. pinophilus strain SPJ22 was sub-cultured unto petri dishes containing solidified PDA, MEA, and CYA and incubated at 27 oC in darkness for three weeks. Five different solvents (acetonitrile, dichloromethane, hexane, 80% methanol and water) were further utilised to extract the metabolites from the cultured fungus. For the extraction of metabolites, 5 g of the isolate, including the medium, was plugged into a centrifuge tube containing 10 mL of each solvent. The content was agitated for 1 h using a Labcon shaker (Labcon, California, USA) and thereafter, filtered using a Whatman no. 4 filter paper (Merck, Johannesburg, SA). A freeze-drier was used to concentrate the filtrate and dried extract reconstituted using 5 mL of LC-MS grade methanol. Approximately 1.5 mL of the extract was filter-sterilised and transferred into dark amber vials for GC-HRTOF-MS analysis. For each sample, extraction of metabolites was done in triplicates.

GC-HRTOF-MS analysis

The samples were analysed with a LECO Pegasus mass spectrometer (LECO Corporation, St Joseph, MI, USA) equipped with a modified Agilent 7890 A Gas Chromatograph containing an oven and a split/splitless inlet (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA). The column utilised was a Rxi-5 SilMS (29.5 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm) (Restek, Bellefonte, PA, USA). The carrier gas used was helium pumped at a constant flow rate of 1 mL/min with an inlet temperature of 250  °C. An initial oven temperature of 40 °C was set and maintained for 0.5 min and slowly ramped at a rate of 10  °C/min to 250  °C and held for about 0.5 min. The mass spectrometer was configured as follows: source temperature at 250 °C; electron ionisation at − 70 eV; transfer line temperature at 250 °C; stored mass range at 45–600; acquisition rate at 10 spectra/s for GC-HRTOF-MS; and detector offset voltage at 300 V.

Data processing and statistical analysis

A ChromaTOF software (LECO, USA) was used for matched filtering, peak identification, and retention time alignment. After that, each compound was identified by comparison with mass spectral databases (NIST, Adams, and EO libraries), and a semi-quantification of each molecule was established using peak regions and relative concentration expressed in percentage.

Availability of data and materials

The raw datasets obtained in this work are available upon request from the corresponding authors.



Gas chromatography high resolution time-of-flight mass spectrometry


Czapek yeast extract agar


Malt extract agar


Potato dextrose agar


Dimethyl sulfoxide


Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry


  1. Tabarestani MS, Rahnama K, Jahanshahi M, Nasrollanejad S, Fatemi MH. Identification of volatile organic compounds from Trichoderma virens (6011) by GC-MS and separation of a bioactive compound via nanotechnology. Int J Eng Trans. 2016;29(10):1347–53.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Salwan R, Kumari N, Sharma V. Bioactive volatile metabolites of Trichoderma: an overview. In: Secondary metabolites of plant growth promoting Rhizomicroorganisms. Singapore: Springer; 2019. p. 87–111.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Morath SU, Hung R, Bennett JW. Fungal volatile organic compounds: a review with emphasis on their biotechnological potential. Fungal Biol Rev. 2012;26(2–3):73–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mäki M, Mali T, Hellén H, Heinonsalo J, Lundell T, Bäck J. Deadwood substrate and species-species interactions determine the release of volatile organic compounds by wood-decaying fungi. Fungal Ecol. 2021;54:101106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhai MM, Li J, Jiang CX, Shi YP, Di DL, Crews P, et al. The bioactive secondary metabolites from Talaromyces species. Nat Prod Bioprospect. 2016;6(1):1–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Li CX, Zhao S, Zhang T, Xian L, Liao LS, Liu JL, et al. Genome sequencing and analysis of Talaromyces pinophilus provide insights into biotechnological applications. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vinale F, Nicoletti R, Lacatena F, Marra R, Sacco A, Lombardi N, et al. Secondary metabolites from the endophytic fungus Talaromyces pinophilus. Nat Prod Res. 2017;31(15):1778–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang T, Liao LS, Li CX, Liao GY, Lin X, Luo XM, et al. Identification of a novel transcription factor TP05746 involved in regulating the production of plant-biomass-degrading enzymes in Talaromyces pinophilus. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:2875.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee SY, Ten LN, Das K, You YH, Jung HY. Biodegradative activities of fungal strains isolated from terrestrial environments in Korea. Mycobiology. 2021;49(3):285–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Caro Y, Venkatachalam M, Lebeau J, Fouillaud M, DufossébL. Pigments and colourants from filamentous fungi. In: Mérillon JM, Ramawat KG, editors. Fungal metabolites. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017. pp. 499–568.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. El-Shahir AA, El-Tayeh NA, Ali OM, Abdel Latef AAH, Loutfy N. The effect of endophytic Talaromyces pinophilus on growth, absorption and accumulation of heavy metals of Triticum aestivum grown on sandy soil amended by Sewage Sludge. Plants. 2021;10(12):2659.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Khalmuratova I, Kim H, Nam YJ, Oh Y, Jeong MJ, Choi HR, et al. Diversity and plant growth promoting capacity of endophytic fungi associated with halophytic plants from the west coast of Korea. Mycobiology. 2015;43(4):373–83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Patel D, Patel A, Patel M, Goswami D. Talaromyces pinophilus strain M13: a portrayal of novel groundbreaking fungal strain for phytointensification. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2021;28(7):8758–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Abdel-Rahim IR, Abo-Elyousr KAM. Talaromyces pinophilus strain AUN-1 as a novel mycoparasite of Botrytis cinerea, the pathogen of onion scape and umbel blights. Microbiol Res. 2018;212–213:1–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Alagesaboopathi C. Biological control of damping-off disease of cotton seedling. Curr Sci. 1994;66(11):865–8.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fiorito F, Cerracchio C, Salvatore MM, Serra F, Pucciarelli A, Amoroso MG, et al. Antiviral property of the fungal metabolite 3-O-Methylfunicone in Bovine Herpesvirus 1 infection. Microorganisms. 2022;10(1):188.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhai MM, Niu HT, Li J, Xiao H, Shi YP, Di DL, et al. Talaromycolides A-C, novel phenyl-substituted phthalides isolated from the green Chinese onion-derived fungus Talaromyces pinophilus AF-02. J Agric Food Chem. 2015;63(43):9558–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Miyazawa M, Kimura M, Yabe Y, Tsukamoto D, Sakamoto M, Horibe I, et al. Use of solid phase microextraction (SPME) for profiling the volatile metabolites produced by Glomerella cingulata. J Oleo Sci. 2008;57(11):585–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mattila H, Kuuskeri J, Lundell T. Single-step, single-organism bioethanol production and bioconversion of lignocellulose waste materials by phlebioid fungal species. Bioresour Technol. 2017;225:254–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Muria-Gonzalez MJ, Yeng Y, Breen S, Mead O, Wang C, Chooi YH, et al. Volatile molecules secreted by the wheat pathogen Parastagonospora nodorum are involved in development and phytotoxicity. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Martínez-Padrón HY, Torres-Castillo JA, Rodríguez-Herrera R, López-Santillán JA, Estrada-Drouaillet B, Osorio-Hernández E. Identification and evaluation of secondary metabolites by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) in native strains of Trichoderma species. Afr J Biotechnol. 2018;17(37):1162–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fiehn O. Metabolomics by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry: Combined targeted and untargeted profiling. Curr Protoc Mol Biol. 2016;114(4):1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pauling L, Robinson AB, Teranishi R, Cary P. Quantitative analysis of urine vapor and breath by gas-liquid partition chromatography. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1971;68(10):2374–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Adebo OA, Kayitesi E, Tugizimana F, Njobeh PB. Differential metabolic signatures in naturally and lactic acid bacteria (LAB) fermented ting (a Southern African food) with different tannin content, as revealed by gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC–MS)-based metabolomics. Food Res Int. 2019;121:326–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Adebiyi JA, Njobeh PB, Adebo OA, Kayitesi E. Metabolite profile of Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea) and dawadawa (an African fermented condiment) investigation using gas chromatography high resolution time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC-HRTOF-MS). Heliyon. 2021;7(4):e06666.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Lulamba TE, Green E, Serepa-Dlamini MH. Photorhabdus sp. ETL antimicrobial properties and characterisation of its secondary metabolites by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. Life. 2021;11(8):787.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Makuwa SC, Serepa-Dlamini MH. The antibacterial activity of crude extracts of secondary metabolites from bacterial endophytes associated with Dicoma anomala. Int J Microbiol. 2021, pp. 1–12.

  28. Pelo SP, Adebo OA, Green E. Chemotaxonomic profiling of fungal endophytes of Solanum mauritianum (alien weed) using gas chromatography high resolution time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC-HRTOF-MS). Metabolomics. 2021;17(5):43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Fiedler K, Schütz E, Geh S. Detection of microbial volatile organic compounds (MVOCs) produced by moulds on various materials. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2001;204(2–3):111–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. González-Pérez E, Ortega-Amaro MA, Salazar-Badillo FB, Bautista E, Douterlungne D, Jiménez-Bremont JF. The Arabidopsis-Trichoderma interaction reveals that the fungal growth medium is an important factor in plant growth induction. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Guo Y, Jud W, Weikl F, Ghirardo A, Junker RR, Polle A, et al. Volatile organic compound patterns predict fungal trophic mode and lifestyle. Commun Biol. 2021;4(1):1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mallette N, Pankratz M, Parker EE, Strobel AA, Busse GC, Carlson SP. R, et al. Evaluation of cellulose as a substrate for hydrocarbon fuel production by Ascocoryne sarcoides (NRRL 50072). J Sustain Bioenergy Syst. 2014;4(1):33–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Borjesson T, Stollman U, Schnurer J. Volatile metabolites and other indicators of Penicillium aurantiogriseum growth on different substrates. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1990;56(12):3705–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Larsen TO, Frisvad JC. Characterisation of volatile metabolites from 47 Penicillium taxa. Mycol Res. 1995;99(10):1153–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Wheatley R, Hackett C, Bruce A, Kundzewicz A. Effect of substrate composition on production of volatile organic compounds from Trichoderma spp. Inhibitory to wood decay fungi. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad. 1997;39(2–3):199–205.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Yogeswari S, Ramalakshmi S, Neelavathy R, Muthumary J. Identification and comparative studies of different volatile fractions from Monochaetia kansensis by GC-MS. Glob J Pharmacol. 2012;6(2):65–71.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hadi MY, Mohammed GJ, Hameed IH. Analysis of bioactive chemical compounds of Nigella sativa using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J Pharmacogn Phyther. 2016;8(2):8–24.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Lv X, Lv J, Gao S, Xiang G, Yao Y. Acetic acid enhances the tolerance of grapevines to NaHCO3 stress by increasing salicylic acid production. Sci Hortic. 2021;288:110338.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Sornakili A, Thankappan S, Sridharan AP, Nithya P, Uthandi S. Antagonistic fungal endophytes and their metabolite-mediated interactions against phytopathogens in rice. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 2020;112:101525.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Brito-Madurro AG, Prade RA, Madurro JM, Santos MA, Peres NTA, Cursino-Santos JR, et al. A single amino acid substitution in one of the lipases of Aspergillus nidulans confers resistance to the antimycotic drug undecanoic acid. Biochem Genet. 2008;46(9–10):557–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Narra N, Kaki SS, Prasad RBN, Misra S, Dhevendar K, Kontham V, et al. Synthesis and evaluation of anti-oxidant and cytotoxic activities of novel 10-undecenoic acid methyl ester based lipoconjugates of phenolic acids. Beilstein J Org Chem. 2017;13:26–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Dascalu AE, Ghinet A, Lipka E, Furman C, Rigo B, Fayeulle A, et al. Design, synthesis and evaluation of hydrazine and acyl hydrazone derivatives of 5-pyrrolidin-2-one as antifungal agents. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2020;30(13):127220.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Zakaria NA, Darah I, Shaida FS, Supardy AN. Phytochemical composition and antibacterial potential of hexane extract from Malaysian red algae, Acanthophora spicifera (Vahl) Borgesen. World Appl Sci J. 2011;15(4):496–501.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Arunkumar S, Muthuselvam M. Analysis of phytochemical constituents and antimicrobial activities of Aloe vera L. against clinical pathogens. World J Agric Sci. 2009;5(5):572–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Al-Reza SM, Rahman A, Kang SC. Chemical composition and inhibitory effect of essential oil and organic extracts of Cestrum nocturnum L. on food-borne pathogens. Int J Food Sci Technol. 2009;44(6):1176–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Hussein HM, Hameed IH, Ibraheem OA. Antimicrobial activity and spectral chemical analysis of methanolic leaves extract of Adiantum capillus-veneris using GC-MS and FT-IR spectroscopy. Int J Pharmacogn Phytochem Res. 2016;8(3):369–85.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Campbell MN. Biodiesel: algae as a renewable source for liquid fuel. Guelph Eng J. 2008;1:2–7.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Martinez A, Bennett JW. Fungal volatile organic compounds. In: Encyclopedia of mycology. Elsevier; 2021. p. 239–45.

  49. Al Fahad AJ. Putative biosynthesis of Talarodioxadione and Talarooxime from Talaromyces stipitatus. Molecules. 2022;27(14):4473.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Le Govic Y, Papon N, Le Gal S, Bouchara JP, Vandeputte P. Non-ribosomal peptide synthetase gene clusters in the human pathogenic fungus Scedosporium apiospermum. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:2062.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Yilmaz N, Visagie CM, Frisvad JC, Houbraken J, Jacobs K, Samson RA. Taxonomic re-evaluation of species in Talaromyces section Islandici, using a polyphasic approach. Persoonia Mol Phylogeny Evol Fungi. 2016;36:37–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. White TJ, Burns T, Lee S, Taylor J. Amplification and direct identification of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sinsky JJ, White TJ, editors. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. San Diego: Academic Press; 1990. pp. 315–22.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol. 2016;33(7):1870–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Tamura K, Nei M. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol Biol Evol. 1993;10:512–26.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Patel D, Vora S, Gangawane A, Menon S, Goswami D. Talaromyces pinophilus strain M13: a depiction of new pioneering fungal strain for Phytointensification. Biosci. Biotechnol Res Commun. 2020;13(1):216–23.

    Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors would like to thank the University of Johannesburg for their financial support. The authors are grateful to the dairy cattle farmers in South Africa’s Free State and Limpopo provinces for donating the feed samples. We also acknowledge the African Centre for DNA Barcoding (ACDB) D3 Lab 115, University of Johannesburg, Kingsway Campus, Johannesburg, South Africa, for enabling us to conduct our molecular analysis in their laboratory.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



OAA, SG, ST and GK performed the experimental work. OAA, SG, OAA and AOA carried out the data analysis. OAA, GS and RM co-drafted the manuscript. JAA and PBN supervised the work. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick Berka Njobeh.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Johannesburg (Ref. number 20160303; Approved date: 3 March 2016).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1

. Identified metabolites in the different intersections of the Venn diagram.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Adelusi, O.A., Gbashi, S., Adebiyi, J.A. et al. Variability in metabolites produced by Talaromyces pinophilus SPJ22 cultured on different substrates. Fungal Biol Biotechnol 9, 15 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Metabolites
  • Fungi
  • Talaromyces pinophilus
  • Substrates